%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NLP222+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:35:41 PM UTC 2026
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.07s 0.35s
% Output : Saturation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_28ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_34ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( ~ agent(X1,X2,esk21_8(X3,X4,X5,X6,X1,X7,X8,X9))
| ~ be(X3,X9,X8,X8)
| ~ theme(X3,X6,X1)
| ~ agent(X3,X6,X4)
| ~ of(X3,X5,X4)
| ~ of(X3,X7,X8)
| ~ state(X3,X9)
| ~ jules_forename(X3,X7)
| ~ smoke(X1,X2)
| ~ accessible_world(X3,X1)
| ~ think_believe_consider(X3,X6)
| ~ present(X1,X2)
| ~ present(X3,X6)
| ~ event(X1,X2)
| ~ event(X3,X6)
| ~ proposition(X3,X1)
| ~ forename(X3,X5)
| ~ forename(X3,X7)
| ~ vincent_forename(X3,X5)
| ~ man(X3,X4)
| ~ man(X3,X8)
| ~ actual_world(X3)
| epred2_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ man(esk17_0,X1)
| epred2_0
| agent(esk17_0,esk20_1(X1),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ be(X2,X8,X7,X7)
| ~ theme(X2,X5,X1)
| ~ agent(X2,X5,X3)
| ~ of(X2,X4,X3)
| ~ of(X2,X6,X7)
| ~ state(X2,X8)
| ~ jules_forename(X2,X6)
| ~ accessible_world(X2,X1)
| ~ think_believe_consider(X2,X5)
| ~ present(X2,X5)
| ~ event(X2,X5)
| ~ proposition(X2,X1)
| ~ forename(X2,X4)
| ~ forename(X2,X6)
| ~ vincent_forename(X2,X4)
| ~ man(X2,X3)
| ~ man(X2,X7)
| ~ actual_world(X2)
| man(X1,esk21_8(X2,X3,X4,X5,X1,X6,X7,X8))
| epred2_0 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ man(esk17_0,X1)
| epred2_0
| smoke(esk17_0,esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( ~ man(esk17_0,X1)
| epred2_0
| present(esk17_0,esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
epred1_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_47]),c_0_48]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ man(esk17_0,X1)
| epred2_0
| event(esk17_0,esk20_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
~ epred2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
( ~ actual_world(X1)
| ~ of(X1,X7,X6)
| ~ of(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ man(X1,X6)
| ~ man(X1,X3)
| ~ vincent_forename(X1,X7)
| ~ forename(X1,X7)
| ~ forename(X1,X4)
| ~ proposition(X1,esk17_0)
| ~ agent(X1,X5,X6)
| ~ theme(X1,X5,esk17_0)
| ~ event(X1,X5)
| ~ present(X1,X5)
| ~ think_believe_consider(X1,X5)
| ~ accessible_world(X1,esk17_0)
| ~ jules_forename(X1,X4)
| ~ state(X1,X2)
| ~ be(X1,X2,X3,X3)
| epred2_0 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]),c_0_36]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
be(esk11_0,esk19_0,esk12_0,esk18_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
theme(esk11_0,esk16_0,esk17_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
agent(esk11_0,esk16_0,esk14_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
of(esk11_0,esk15_0,esk14_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
of(esk11_0,esk13_0,esk12_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
state(esk11_0,esk19_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
jules_forename(esk11_0,esk13_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
accessible_world(esk11_0,esk17_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
think_believe_consider(esk11_0,esk16_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
present(esk11_0,esk16_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
event(esk11_0,esk16_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
proposition(esk11_0,esk17_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
forename(esk11_0,esk15_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
forename(esk11_0,esk13_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
vincent_forename(esk11_0,esk15_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
man(esk11_0,esk18_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
man(esk11_0,esk14_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
man(esk11_0,esk12_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
actual_world(esk11_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : NLP222+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.31 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.31 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.04/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:51:15 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.04/0.31 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.35 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.35 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % new_bool_3 with pid 1336897 completed with status 1
% 0.07/0.35 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.07/0.35 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.35 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.35 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.35 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1336902 completed with status 1
% 0.07/0.35 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.07/0.35 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.07/0.35 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.07/0.35 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.35 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.07/0.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.35 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.35
% 0.07/0.35 % No proof found!
% 0.07/0.35 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.07/0.35 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.35 % Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.07/0.35 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Initial clauses : 51
% 0.07/0.35 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Initial clauses in saturation : 51
% 0.07/0.35 % Processed clauses : 96
% 0.07/0.35 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.07/0.35 % ...remaining for further processing : 95
% 0.07/0.35 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Backward-subsumed : 19
% 0.07/0.35 % Backward-rewritten : 29
% 0.07/0.35 % Generated clauses : 47
% 0.07/0.35 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 47
% 0.07/0.35 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 45
% 0.07/0.35 % Paramodulations : 28
% 0.07/0.35 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % NegExts : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Total rewrite steps : 29
% 0.07/0.35 % ...of those cached : 28
% 0.07/0.35 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/0.35 % Current number of processed clauses : 28
% 0.07/0.35 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.07/0.35 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.07/0.35 % Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.07/0.35 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.35 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Current number of archived clauses : 67
% 0.07/0.35 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2176
% 0.07/0.35 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 337
% 0.07/0.35 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 64
% 0.07/0.35 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 34
% 0.07/0.35 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.07/0.35 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.07/0.35 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.07/0.35 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7383
% 0.07/0.35 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1553
% 0.07/0.35
% 0.07/0.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.35 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.07/0.35 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.35 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.07/0.35 % Maximum resident set size: 3908 pages
% 0.07/0.35
% 0.07/0.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.35 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.07/0.35 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.35 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.07/0.35 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.07/0.35 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------