%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NLP262+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:36:00 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 22.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 21 ( 12 ~; 7 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(hypernym_transitiviy_1,conjecture,
hypernym(n9986904,n7846),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',hypernym_transitiviy_1) ).
fof(axiom1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( hypernym(X2,X3)
& hypernym(X1,X2) )
=> hypernym(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom1) ).
fof(kb340304,axiom,
hypernym(n10126424,n9855630),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax',kb340304) ).
fof(kb117091,axiom,
hypernym(n10560637,n7846),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax',kb117091) ).
fof(kb886122,axiom,
hypernym(n9855630,n10560637),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax',kb886122) ).
fof(kb1049,axiom,
hypernym(n9986904,n10126424),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NLP001+0.ax',kb1049) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n7846),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[hypernym_transitiviy_1]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( hypernym(X4,X6)
| ~ hypernym(X5,X6)
| ~ hypernym(X4,X5) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n7846),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ hypernym(X2,X3)
| ~ hypernym(X1,X2)
| hypernym(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
hypernym(n10126424,n9855630),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb340304]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n7846),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
hypernym(n10560637,n7846),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb117091]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
hypernym(n9855630,n10560637),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb886122]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ hypernym(X1,n10126424)
| hypernym(X1,n9855630) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
hypernym(n9986904,n10126424),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb1049]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n7846),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ hypernym(X1,n10560637)
| hypernym(X1,n7846) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ hypernym(X1,n9855630)
| hypernym(X1,n10560637) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
hypernym(n9986904,n9855630),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n10560637),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NLP262+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:51:11 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/22.59 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/22.59 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/22.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 286 seconds (2288 total)
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1430s (5) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 286s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 286s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting sh5l with 286s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % sh5l with pid 1177175 completed with status 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.18/22.59 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/22.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 286 seconds (2288 total)
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1430s (5) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 286s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 286s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting sh5l with 286s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.18/22.59 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/22.59 % Search class: FHUNF-FSMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/22.59 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/22.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 282 seconds (282 total)
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 29s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1177187 completed with status 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.18/22.59 % Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/22.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 286 seconds (2288 total)
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1430s (5) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 286s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 286s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting sh5l with 286s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.18/22.59 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/22.59 % Search class: FHUNF-FSMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/22.59 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/22.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 282 seconds (282 total)
% 0.18/22.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 29s (1) cores
% 0.18/22.59 % Preprocessing time : 0.281 s
% 0.18/22.59
% 0.18/22.59 % Proof found!
% 0.18/22.59 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/22.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/22.59 % Parsed axioms : 1026861
% 0.18/22.59 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1026439
% 0.18/22.59 % Initial clauses : 422
% 0.18/22.59 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Initial clauses in saturation : 422
% 0.18/22.59 % Processed clauses : 509
% 0.18/22.59 % ...of these trivial : 26
% 0.18/22.59 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % ...remaining for further processing : 483
% 0.18/22.59 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Generated clauses : 185
% 0.18/22.59 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 124
% 0.18/22.59 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Paramodulations : 185
% 0.18/22.59 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % NegExts : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Total rewrite steps : 85
% 0.18/22.59 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.18/22.59 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/22.59 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/22.59 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/22.59 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/22.59 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/22.59 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/22.59 % Current number of processed clauses : 483
% 0.18/22.59 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 420
% 0.18/22.59 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.18/22.59 % Non-unit-clauses : 61
% 0.18/22.59 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 36
% 0.18/22.59 % ...number of literals in the above : 79
% 0.18/22.59 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 621
% 0.18/22.59 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 621
% 0.18/22.59 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.18/22.59 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/22.59 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4115292
% 0.18/22.59 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2409915
% 0.18/22.59
% 0.18/22.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/22.59 % User time : 3.796 s
% 0.18/22.59 % System time : 1.690 s
% 0.18/22.59 % Total time : 5.486 s
% 0.18/22.59 % Maximum resident set size: 1441284 pages
% 0.18/22.59
% 0.18/22.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/22.59 % User time : 18.064 s
% 0.18/22.59 % System time : 2.828 s
% 0.18/22.59 % Total time : 20.892 s
% 0.18/22.59 % Maximum resident set size: 602368 pages
% 0.18/22.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------