↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NLP265_17 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:36:00 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   5   ~;   2   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    '$ki_world': $tType ).

tff(decl_sort2,type,
    '$ki_index': $tType ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    '$ki_local_world': '$ki_world' ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    '$ki_accessible': ( '$ki_world' * ( '$ki_world' * '$ki_index' ) ) > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    '#idx(b_alice)': '$ki_index' ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    '#idx(b_bob)': '$ki_index' ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    '#idx(i_alice)': '$ki_index' ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    portland: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    bigcity: ( $i * '$ki_world' ) > $o ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    esk1_0: '$ki_world' ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    esk2_0: '$ki_world' ).

tff(verify,conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( '$ki_accessible'('#idx(i_alice)','$ki_local_world',X1)
     => ! [X3: '$ki_world'] :
          ( '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_bob)',X1,X3)
         => bigcity(X3,portland) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',verify) ).

tff(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_alice)','$ki_local_world',X1)
     => bigcity(X1,portland) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

tff('mrel_universal_#idx(b_alice)',axiom,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world',X2: '$ki_world'] : '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_alice)',X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','mrel_universal_#idx(b_alice)') ).

tff(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
        ( '$ki_accessible'('#idx(i_alice)','$ki_local_world',X1)
       => ! [X3: '$ki_world'] :
            ( '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_bob)',X1,X3)
           => bigcity(X3,portland) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[verify]) ).

tff(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X7: '$ki_world'] :
      ( bigcity(X7,portland)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_alice)','$ki_local_world',X7) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])]) ).

tff(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X19: '$ki_world',X20: '$ki_world'] : '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_alice)',X19,X20),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['mrel_universal_#idx(b_alice)']) ).

tff(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ bigcity(esk2_0,portland)
    & '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_bob)',esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & '$ki_accessible'('#idx(i_alice)','$ki_local_world',esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_alice)','$ki_local_world',X1)
      | bigcity(X1,portland) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

tcf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world',X2: '$ki_world'] : '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_alice)',X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

tcf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ bigcity(esk2_0,portland),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

tcf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] : bigcity(X1,portland),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NLP265_17 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:58:15 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % new_bool_3 with pid 3165353 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.44  % Search class: FGHNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3165356 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.44  % Search class: FGHNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.11/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 12
% 0.11/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 11
% 0.11/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.11/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 7
% 0.11/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 7
% 0.11/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.11/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.11/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.11/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.11/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.11/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 21
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.11/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.11/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.11/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 880
% 0.11/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 192
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44  % User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.44  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------