↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NLP267_17 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:36:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  13   ~;  10   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn  18   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    '$ki_world': $tType ).

tff(decl_sort2,type,
    '$ki_index': $tType ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    '$ki_local_world': '$ki_world' ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    '$ki_accessible': ( '$ki_world' * ( '$ki_world' * '$ki_index' ) ) > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    '#idx(b_s)': '$ki_index' ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    seventy: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    second: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    paris: $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    price: ( $i * '$ki_world' ) > $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    dest: ( $i * '$ki_world' ) > $o ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    class: ( $i * '$ki_world' ) > $o ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    esk1_0: '$ki_world' ).

tff(axiom_5,axiom,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X1)
     => ( class(X1,second)
        & dest(X1,paris) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

tff('mrel_universal_#idx(b_s)',axiom,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world',X2: '$ki_world'] : '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)',X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','mrel_universal_#idx(b_s)') ).

tff(verify,conjecture,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X1)
     => price(X1,seventy) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',verify) ).

tff(axiom_2,axiom,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X1)
     => ( ( class(X1,second)
          & dest(X1,paris) )
       => price(X1,seventy) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

tff(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X14: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X14)
        | class(X14,second) )
      & ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X14)
        | dest(X14,paris) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])])])]) ).

tff(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X8: '$ki_world',X9: '$ki_world'] : '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)',X8,X9),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],['mrel_universal_#idx(b_s)']) ).

tff(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
        ( '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X1)
       => price(X1,seventy) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[verify]) ).

tff(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X5: '$ki_world'] :
      ( price(X5,seventy)
      | ~ class(X5,second)
      | ~ dest(X5,paris)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X5) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X1)
      | dest(X1,paris) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

tcf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world',X2: '$ki_world'] : '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)',X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

tcf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X1)
      | class(X1,second) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

tff(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ price(esk1_0,seventy)
    & '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
      ( ~ class(X1,second)
      | ~ dest(X1,paris)
      | ~ '$ki_accessible'('#idx(b_s)','$ki_local_world',X1)
      | price(X1,seventy) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] : dest(X1,paris),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] : class(X1,second),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9])]) ).

tcf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ price(esk1_0,seventy),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1: '$ki_world'] : price(X1,seventy),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NLP267_17 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:57:20 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % sh5l with pid 2018919 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.10/0.43  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.10/0.43  % Search class: FHHNS-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % partial match(1): FHHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2018920 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.10/0.43  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.10/0.43  % Search class: FHHNS-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % partial match(1): FHHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.10/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 24
% 0.10/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 14
% 0.10/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.10/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.10/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 11
% 0.10/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.10/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 9
% 0.10/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.10/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.10/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 14
% 0.10/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 7
% 0.10/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.10/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.10/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.10/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.10/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.10/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.10/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.10/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.10/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.10/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.10/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 970
% 0.10/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 159
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.43  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.10/0.43  % System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.43  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.10/0.43  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.10/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------