%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : NUM001-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fGdWsakpgd true
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:45:44 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.82s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.15 % Problem : NUM001-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.16 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fGdWsakpgd true
% 0.15/0.39 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.39 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:53:53 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.40 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.40 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.22/0.40 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.22/0.40 % Running in FO mode
% 0.53/0.70 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.53/0.70 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.53/0.70 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.59/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.60/0.81 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.60/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.60/0.82 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.60/0.82 % BCE start: 13
% 0.60/0.82 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.60/0.82 % PE start: 13
% 0.60/0.82 logic: neq
% 0.60/0.82 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.60/0.82 % done 28 iterations in 0.027s
% 0.60/0.82 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.60/0.82 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.60/0.82 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(prove_equation, conjecture,
% 0.60/0.82 (equalish @ ( add @ ( add @ a @ b ) @ c ) @ ( add @ a @ ( add @ b @ c ) ))).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.60/0.82 (~( equalish @
% 0.60/0.82 ( add @ ( add @ a @ b ) @ c ) @ ( add @ a @ ( add @ b @ c ) ) )),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_equation])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (~ (equalish @ (add @ (add @ a @ b) @ c) @ (add @ a @ (add @ b @ c)))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(commutativity_of_addition, axiom,
% 0.60/0.82 (equalish @ ( add @ A @ B ) @ ( add @ B @ A ))).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ (add @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_addition])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(associativity_of_addition, axiom,
% 0.60/0.82 (equalish @ ( add @ A @ ( add @ B @ C ) ) @ ( add @ ( add @ A @ B ) @ C ))).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82 (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ (add @ X1 @ X2)) @
% 0.60/0.82 (add @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity_of_addition])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ (add @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [commutativity_of_addition])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(transitivity, axiom,
% 0.60/0.82 (( ~( equalish @ A @ B ) ) | ( ~( equalish @ B @ C ) ) |
% 0.60/0.82 ( equalish @ A @ C ))).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82 (~ (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.60/0.82 | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.60/0.82 | (equalish @ X0 @ X2))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82 (~ (equalish @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)
% 0.60/0.82 | (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ X2))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82 (equalish @ (add @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X2) @
% 0.60/0.82 (add @ (add @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82 (~ (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.60/0.82 | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.60/0.82 | (equalish @ X0 @ X2))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82 (~ (equalish @ (add @ (add @ X2 @ X1) @ X0) @ X3)
% 0.60/0.82 | (equalish @ (add @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X2) @ X3))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl22, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl54, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82 (equalish @ (add @ (add @ X0 @ X2) @ X1) @
% 0.60/0.82 (add @ X2 @ (add @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl25])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82 (~ (equalish @ (add @ (add @ X2 @ X1) @ X0) @ X3)
% 0.60/0.82 | (equalish @ (add @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X2) @ X3))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl22, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl92, plain,
% 0.60/0.82 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.60/0.82 (equalish @ (add @ (add @ X2 @ X1) @ X0) @
% 0.60/0.82 (add @ X2 @ (add @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl54, zip_derived_cl25])).
% 0.60/0.82 thf(zip_derived_cl93, plain, ($false),
% 0.60/0.82 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl92])).
% 0.60/0.82
% 0.60/0.82 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.60/0.82
% 0.60/0.82
% 0.60/0.82 % Terminating...
% 1.53/0.93 % Runner terminated.
% 1.56/0.94 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------