↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 22.90s 3.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 22.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   54 (  23 unt;   0 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  100 (   0 equ;  51 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  145 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(transitivity,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',transitivity) ).

cnf(addition_inverts_subtraction1,axiom,
    equalish(subtract(add(X1,X2),X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',addition_inverts_subtraction1) ).

cnf(subtract_substitution1,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,subtract(X1,X4))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X3,subtract(X2,X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',subtract_substitution1) ).

cnf(commutativity1,axiom,
    equalish(add(subtract(X1,X2),X3),subtract(add(X1,X3),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',commutativity1) ).

cnf(subtract_substitution2,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,subtract(X4,X1))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X3,subtract(X4,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',subtract_substitution2) ).

cnf(addition_inverts_subtraction2,axiom,
    equalish(X1,subtract(add(X1,X2),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',addition_inverts_subtraction2) ).

cnf(commutativity_of_addition,axiom,
    equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',commutativity_of_addition) ).

cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
    equalish(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',reflexivity) ).

cnf(add_substitution2,axiom,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,add(X4,X1))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X3,add(X4,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',add_substitution2) ).

cnf(prove_equation,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(subtract(a,b),c),add(a,subtract(c,b))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equation) ).

cnf(associativity_of_addition,axiom,
    equalish(add(X1,add(X2,X3)),add(add(X1,X2),X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM002-0.ax',associativity_of_addition) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[transitivity]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    equalish(subtract(add(X1,X2),X2),X1),
    addition_inverts_subtraction1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,subtract(X1,X4))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X3,subtract(X2,X4)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subtract_substitution1]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,subtract(add(X2,X3),X3))
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    equalish(add(subtract(X1,X2),X3),subtract(add(X1,X3),X2)),
    commutativity1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,subtract(X4,X1))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X3,subtract(X4,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subtract_substitution2]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,subtract(X1,X4))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X3,subtract(X2,X4)) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    equalish(X1,subtract(add(X1,X2),X2)),
    addition_inverts_subtraction2 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    equalish(add(subtract(X1,X2),X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,subtract(X4,X1))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X3,subtract(X4,X2)) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(add(X1,X3),X2)
    | equalish(X1,subtract(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,add(subtract(X2,X3),X3))
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1)),
    commutativity_of_addition ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    equalish(X1,X1),
    reflexivity ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X4,X3)
    | ~ equalish(add(X1,X4),X2)
    | equalish(X1,subtract(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    equalish(add(X1,subtract(X2,X1)),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(subtract(X1,X2),subtract(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(subtract(X2,X1),X3)
    | equalish(X1,subtract(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,add(X3,X2))
    | equalish(subtract(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,add(X4,X1))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X3,add(X4,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[add_substitution2]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,add(X3,X1))
    | equalish(X1,subtract(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X3,add(X4,X1))
    | ~ equalish(X1,X2)
    | equalish(X3,add(X4,X2)) ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(add(X2,X3),add(X3,X1))
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X1)
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    equalish(X1,subtract(X2,subtract(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    equalish(subtract(X1,subtract(X1,X2)),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(subtract(a,b),c),add(a,subtract(c,b))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_equation]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,subtract(X3,subtract(X3,X2)))
    | equalish(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,X4)
    | equalish(add(subtract(X1,X2),X3),subtract(add(X1,X3),X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X1,add(X3,X2))
    | equalish(X1,add(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,axiom,
    equalish(add(X1,add(X2,X3)),add(add(X1,X2),X3)),
    associativity_of_addition ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(subtract(a,b),c),add(a,subtract(c,b))),
    c_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X2,subtract(add(X1,X3),X4))
    | equalish(add(subtract(X1,X2),X3),X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X4,X2)
    | ~ equalish(add(X1,X3),X4)
    | equalish(X1,subtract(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    equalish(add(X1,add(X2,X3)),add(X3,add(X1,X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(b,subtract(add(a,c),add(a,subtract(c,b)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(add(X4,add(X1,X3)),X2)
    | equalish(X1,subtract(X2,add(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(X4,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X1,add(X4,X2))
    | equalish(X1,add(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(subtract(c,b),add(b,a)),add(a,c)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(add(X1,X2),X4)
    | equalish(add(X1,add(X2,X3)),add(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:58:24 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 22.90/3.81  % Version: 3.5.1
% 22.90/3.81  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 22.90/3.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4108390 completed with status 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 22.90/3.81  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 22.90/3.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 22.90/3.81  % No SInE strategy applied
% 22.90/3.81  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 22.90/3.81  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4108395 completed with status 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 22.90/3.81  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 22.90/3.81  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 22.90/3.81  % No SInE strategy applied
% 22.90/3.81  % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 22.90/3.81  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 22.90/3.81  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 22.90/3.81  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 22.90/3.81  
% 22.90/3.81  % Proof found!
% 22.90/3.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 22.90/3.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 22.90/3.81  % Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 22.90/3.81  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Initial clauses                      : 13
% 22.90/3.81  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 22.90/3.81  % Processed clauses                    : 15753
% 22.90/3.81  % ...of these trivial                  : 141
% 22.90/3.81  % ...subsumed                          : 13565
% 22.90/3.81  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2047
% 22.90/3.81  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 22.90/3.81  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Generated clauses                    : 449292
% 22.90/3.81  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 439684
% 22.90/3.81  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 7
% 22.90/3.81  % Paramodulations                      : 449292
% 22.90/3.81  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % NegExts                              : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Total rewrite steps                  : 16150
% 22.90/3.81  % ...of those cached                   : 15673
% 22.90/3.81  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 22.90/3.81  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 22.90/3.81  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 22.90/3.81  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 22.90/3.81  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 22.90/3.81  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 22.90/3.81  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 22.90/3.81  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 22.90/3.81  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 22.90/3.81  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 22.90/3.81  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 22.90/3.81  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 22.90/3.81  % Current number of processed clauses  : 2033
% 22.90/3.81  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 227
% 22.90/3.81  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 22.90/3.81  %    Negative unit clauses             : 29
% 22.90/3.81  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1777
% 22.90/3.81  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 423942
% 22.90/3.81  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1068982
% 22.90/3.81  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Current number of archived clauses   : 14
% 22.90/3.81  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 831999
% 22.90/3.81  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 826437
% 22.90/3.81  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 13542
% 22.90/3.81  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11246
% 22.90/3.81  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8834
% 22.90/3.81  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 22.90/3.81  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 5407146
% 22.90/3.81  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 24
% 22.90/3.81  
% 22.90/3.81  % -------------------------------------------------
% 22.90/3.81  % User time                : 3.060 s
% 22.90/3.81  % System time              : 0.189 s
% 22.90/3.81  % Total time               : 3.249 s
% 22.90/3.81  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 22.90/3.81  
% 22.90/3.81  % -------------------------------------------------
% 22.90/3.81  % User time                : 15.244 s
% 22.90/3.81  % System time              : 0.872 s
% 22.90/3.81  % Total time               : 16.116 s
% 22.90/3.81  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 22.90/3.81  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------