↑ Up

Twee---2.7.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.7
% Problem  : NUM002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:09:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 16.44s 2.45s
% Output   : Proof 16.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : NUM002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.02/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.02/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.02/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.02/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.02/0.29  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 18:38:49 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.30  Running run_twee /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 16.44/2.45  Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --complete-subsets --ground-joining-incomplete-limit 15 --flatten-every 2
% 16.44/2.45  
% 16.44/2.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 16.44/2.45  
% 16.44/2.45  % SZS output start Proof
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 1 (reflexivity): equalish(X, X) = true.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom): ifeq(X, X, Y, Z) = Y.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 3 (addition_inverts_subtraction2): equalish(X, subtract(add(X, Y), Y)) = true.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 4 (commutativity_of_addition): equalish(add(X, Y), add(Y, X)) = true.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 5 (addition_inverts_subtraction1): equalish(subtract(add(X, Y), Y), X) = true.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 6 (associativity_of_addition): equalish(add(X, add(Y, Z)), add(add(X, Y), Z)) = true.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 7 (commutativity1): equalish(add(subtract(X, Y), Z), subtract(add(X, Z), Y)) = true.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 8 (commutativity2): equalish(subtract(add(X, Y), Z), add(subtract(X, Z), Y)) = true.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 9 (transitivity): ifeq(equalish(X, Y), true, ifeq(equalish(Z, X), true, equalish(Z, Y), true), true) = true.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 10 (add_substitution1): ifeq(equalish(X, add(Y, Z)), true, ifeq(equalish(Y, W), true, equalish(X, add(W, Z)), true), true) = true.
% 16.44/2.45  Axiom 11 (add_substitution2): ifeq(equalish(X, add(Y, Z)), true, ifeq(equalish(Z, W), true, equalish(X, add(Y, W)), true), true) = true.
% 16.44/2.46  
% 16.44/2.46  Goal 1 (prove_equation): equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))) = true.
% 16.44/2.46  Proof:
% 16.44/2.46    equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b)))
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(true, true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 11 (add_substitution2) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), c)), true, ifeq(equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 1 (reflexivity) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 9 (transitivity) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(equalish(subtract(add(c, b), b), add(subtract(c, b), b)), true, ifeq(equalish(c, subtract(add(c, b), b)), true, equalish(c, add(subtract(c, b), b)), true), true), true, equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 3 (addition_inverts_subtraction2) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(equalish(subtract(add(c, b), b), add(subtract(c, b), b)), true, ifeq(true, true, equalish(c, add(subtract(c, b), b)), true), true), true, equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(equalish(subtract(add(c, b), b), add(subtract(c, b), b)), true, equalish(c, add(subtract(c, b), b)), true), true, equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 8 (commutativity2) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, equalish(c, add(subtract(c, b), b)), true), true, equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(equalish(c, add(subtract(c, b), b)), true, equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(equalish(c, add(subtract(c, b), b)), true, equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 4 (commutativity_of_addition) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(c, b), b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), true, ifeq(equalish(c, add(subtract(c, b), b)), true, equalish(c, add(b, subtract(c, b))), true), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 9 (transitivity) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(true, true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 10 (add_substitution1) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(add(subtract(a, b), b), subtract(c, b))), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), a), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 6 (associativity_of_addition) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), a), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), a), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), a), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 7 (commutativity1) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), subtract(add(a, b), b)), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), a), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(true, true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), subtract(add(a, b), b)), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), a), true), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 5 (addition_inverts_subtraction1) R->L }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(ifeq(equalish(subtract(add(a, b), b), a), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), subtract(add(a, b), b)), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), b), a), true), true), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 9 (transitivity) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(ifeq(true, true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 2 (ifeq_axiom) }
% 16.44/2.46    ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b))), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true, ifeq(equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(subtract(a, b), add(b, subtract(c, b)))), true, equalish(add(subtract(a, b), c), add(a, subtract(c, b))), true), true)
% 16.44/2.46  = { by axiom 9 (transitivity) }
% 16.44/2.46    true
% 16.44/2.46  % SZS output end Proof
% 16.44/2.46  
% 16.44/2.46  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------