↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : NUM004-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:16:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   30 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  15   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(reflexivity,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] : equalish(VAR_0,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    equalish(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[reflexivity]) ).

fof(transitivity,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( equalish(VAR_0,VAR_2)
      | ~ equalish(VAR_1,VAR_2)
      | ~ equalish(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitivity) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    ( equalish(A,C)
    | ~ equalish(B,C)
    | ~ equalish(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[transitivity]) ).

fof(commutativity_of_addition,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : equalish(add(VAR_0,VAR_1),add(VAR_1,VAR_0)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_addition) ).

cnf(c_3,plain,
    equalish(add(A,B),add(B,A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_addition]) ).

fof(commutativity2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] : equalish(subtract(add(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_2),add(subtract(VAR_0,VAR_2),VAR_1)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity2) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    equalish(subtract(add(A,B),C),add(subtract(A,C),B)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity2]) ).

fof(subtract_substitution1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( equalish(VAR_2,subtract(VAR_1,VAR_3))
      | ~ equalish(VAR_2,subtract(VAR_0,VAR_3))
      | ~ equalish(VAR_0,VAR_1) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subtract_substitution1) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( equalish(C,subtract(B,D))
    | ~ equalish(C,subtract(A,D))
    | ~ equalish(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[subtract_substitution1]) ).

fof(prove_equation,axiom,
    ~ equalish(subtract(add(a,b),c),add(a,subtract(b,c))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_equation) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ~ equalish(subtract(add(a,b),c),add(a,subtract(b,c))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_equation]) ).

cnf(c_183,plain,
    ( equalish(A,subtract(add(C,B),D))
    | ~ equalish(A,subtract(add(B,C),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_11,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_107,plain,
    equalish(subtract(add(A,B),C),subtract(add(B,A),C)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_183,c_1]) ).

cnf(c_184,plain,
    ( equalish(A,add(C,B))
    | ~ equalish(A,add(B,C)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_3]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    ~ equalish(subtract(add(a,b),c),add(subtract(b,c),a)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_184,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_185,plain,
    ( equalish(A,add(subtract(B,D),C))
    | ~ equalish(A,subtract(add(B,C),D)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_181,plain,
    ~ equalish(subtract(add(a,b),c),subtract(add(b,a),c)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_185,c_138]) ).

cnf(c_182,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_181,c_107]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM004-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 01:51:59 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.37  % Process 3106600 was started by sandbox2 on n009,
% 0.10/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 01:51:59 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.38  
% 0.10/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.10/0.40  
% 0.10/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.40  
% 0.10/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.10/0.40  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.10/0.40  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.10/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 13.000.
% 0.10/0.40  % Given clauses 15.
% 0.10/0.40  
% 0.10/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------