↑ Up

CARINE---0.734.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : NUM014-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:05:59 EST 2010

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 31.00s
% Output   : Refutation 31.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31654/NUM/NUM014-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 17] [nf = 0] [nu = 14] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 55] [nf = 0] [nu = 42] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 140] [nf = 0] [nu = 102] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 324] [nf = 0] [nu = 230] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 711] [nf = 0] [nu = 498] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 1509] [nf = 0] [nu = 1050] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 3134] [nf = 0] [nu = 2174] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 6418] [nf = 0] [nu = 4446] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 13025] [nf = 0] [nu = 9018] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 26283] [nf = 0] [nu = 18194] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 52848] [nf = 0] [nu = 36582] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 106032] [nf = 0] [nu = 73398] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 212459] [nf = 0] [nu = 147074] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 425377] [nf = 0] [nu = 294474] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 851282] [nf = 0] [nu = 589326] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 1703166] [nf = 0] [nu = 1179086] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 3407013] [nf = 0] [nu = 2358666] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 12 secs [nr = 6814791] [nf = 0] [nu = 4717890] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 22 secs [nr = 13630436] [nf = 0] [nu = 9436406] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 19827384] [nf = 4] [nu = 13726639] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 19827422] [nf = 4] [nu = 13726667] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 19827512] [nf = 8] [nu = 13726727] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% +================================================+
% |                                                |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% |                                                |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: ~divides_2(a_0(),b_0())
% B3: product_3(a_0(),square_1(c_0()),square_1(b_0()))
% B4: ~product_3(x0,x1,x2) | divides_2(x0,x2)
% B6: ~prime_1(x0) | ~divides_2(x0,x3) | ~product_3(x1,x2,x3) | divides_2(x0,x1) | divides_2(x0,x2)
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U0: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 b nc > ~divides_2(a_0(),b_0())
% U1: < d0 v3 dv1 f1 c0 t4 td2 b > product_3(x0,x0,square_1(x0))
% U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 b > prime_1(a_0())
% U6: < d1 v0 dv0 f1 c2 t3 td2 > divides_2(a_0(),square_1(b_0()))
% U11: < d4 v0 dv0 f0 c2 t2 td1 > divides_2(a_0(),b_0())
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U0:
% ~divides_2(a_0(),b_0()) ....... U0
% Derivation of unit clause U1:
% product_3(x0,x0,square_1(x0)) ....... U1
% Derivation of unit clause U2:
% prime_1(a_0()) ....... U2
% Derivation of unit clause U6:
% product_3(a_0(),square_1(c_0()),square_1(b_0())) ....... B3
% ~product_3(x0,x1,x2) | divides_2(x0,x2) ....... B4
%  divides_2(a_0(), square_1(b_0())) ....... R1 [B3:L0, B4:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U11:
% ~divides_2(a_0(),b_0()) ....... B0
% ~prime_1(x0) | ~divides_2(x0,x3) | ~product_3(x1,x2,x3) | divides_2(x0,x1) | divides_2(x0,x2) ....... B6
%  ~prime_1(a_0()) | ~divides_2(a_0(), x0) | ~product_3(b_0(), x1, x0) | divides_2(a_0(), x1) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B6:L3]
%  prime_1(a_0()) ....... U2
%   ~divides_2(a_0(), x0) | ~product_3(b_0(), x1, x0) | divides_2(a_0(), x1) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U2:L0]
%   divides_2(a_0(),square_1(b_0())) ....... U6
%    ~product_3(b_0(), x0, square_1(b_0())) | divides_2(a_0(), x0) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U6:L0]
%    product_3(x0,x0,square_1(x0)) ....... U1
%     divides_2(a_0(), b_0()) ....... R4 [R3:L0, U1:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% divides_2(a_0(),b_0()) ....... U11
% ~divides_2(a_0(),b_0()) ....... U0
%  [] ....... R1 [U11:L0, U0:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 19827528
% 	resolvents: 19827520	factors: 8
% Number of unit clauses generated: 13726730
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 69.23
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4		[1] = 6		[4] = 2		
% Total = 12
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 13726730	[2] = 6100782	[3] = 5	[4] = 10	[5] = 1	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] prime_1		(+)1	(-)0
% [1] divides_2		(+)4	(-)1
% [2] product_3		(+)3	(-)3
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)8	(-)4
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 12
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 23
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 19827533
% Number of unification failures: 5
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 12
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 15251765
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1525148
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 60
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 6863546
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 5
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 34
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 39
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.87
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 19827538
% ConstructUnitClause() = 6863554
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 8.05 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 639598
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 32 secs
% CPU time: 31.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------