%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : NUM016^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:17:13 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 113 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 22 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 384 ( 58 ~; 51 |; 44 &; 231 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 32 ( 9 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 76 ( 0 ^; 76 !; 0 ?; 76 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
a: $i ).
thf(decl_24,type,
factorial_plus_one: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_25,type,
less: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(decl_26,type,
prime: $i > $o ).
thf(decl_27,type,
prime_divisor: $i > $i ).
thf(decl_28,type,
divides: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(cNUM016_1,conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1: $i] :
~ ( less @ X1 @ X1 )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( less @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] : ( divides @ X1 @ X1 )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ~ ( divides @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( divides @ X2 @ X3 )
| ( divides @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( divides @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] : ( less @ X1 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( divides @ X1 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X2 ) )
| ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( divides @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( prime @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( less @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
& ( prime @ a )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ~ ( prime @ X1 )
| ~ ( less @ a @ X1 )
| ( less @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) @ X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G2AOlT4D5l/E---3.1_243237.p',cNUM016_1) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ( ! [X1: $i] :
~ ( less @ X1 @ X1 )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( less @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] : ( divides @ X1 @ X1 )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ~ ( divides @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( divides @ X2 @ X3 )
| ( divides @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( divides @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] : ( less @ X1 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( divides @ X1 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X2 ) )
| ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( divides @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( prime @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( less @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
& ( prime @ a )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ~ ( prime @ X1 )
| ~ ( less @ a @ X1 )
| ( less @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cNUM016_1]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ ( ! [X1: $i] :
~ ( less @ X1 @ X1 )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( less @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] : ( divides @ X1 @ X1 )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
( ~ ( divides @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( divides @ X2 @ X3 )
| ( divides @ X1 @ X3 ) )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( divides @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] : ( less @ X1 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( divides @ X1 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X2 ) )
| ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( divides @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( prime @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) ) )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( less @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) @ X1 ) )
& ( prime @ a )
& ! [X1: $i] :
( ~ ( prime @ X1 )
| ~ ( less @ a @ X1 )
| ( less @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X20: $i,X21: $i,X22: $i,X23: $i,X24: $i,X25: $i,X26: $i,X27: $i,X28: $i,X29: $i,X30: $i,X31: $i,X32: $i,X33: $i,X34: $i,X35: $i] :
( ~ ( less @ X20 @ X20 )
& ( ~ ( less @ X21 @ X22 )
| ~ ( less @ X22 @ X21 ) )
& ( divides @ X23 @ X23 )
& ( ~ ( divides @ X24 @ X25 )
| ~ ( divides @ X25 @ X26 )
| ( divides @ X24 @ X26 ) )
& ( ~ ( divides @ X27 @ X28 )
| ~ ( less @ X28 @ X27 ) )
& ( less @ X29 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X29 ) )
& ( ~ ( divides @ X30 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X31 ) )
| ( less @ X31 @ X30 ) )
& ( ( prime @ X32 )
| ( divides @ ( prime_divisor @ X32 ) @ X32 ) )
& ( ( prime @ X33 )
| ( prime @ ( prime_divisor @ X33 ) ) )
& ( ( prime @ X34 )
| ( less @ ( prime_divisor @ X34 ) @ X34 ) )
& ( prime @ a )
& ( ~ ( prime @ X35 )
| ~ ( less @ a @ X35 )
| ( less @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) @ X35 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( less @ X1 @ X2 )
| ~ ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( less @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) @ X1 )
| ~ ( prime @ X1 )
| ~ ( less @ a @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
~ ( less @ X1 @ X1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] : ( less @ X1 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ~ ( less @ X1 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) )
| ~ ( less @ a @ X1 )
| ~ ( prime @ X1 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( less @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ( prime @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]),c_0_7])]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( less @ X2 @ X1 )
| ~ ( divides @ X1 @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( divides @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) @ X1 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ( less @ a @ ( prime_divisor @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) ) )
| ~ ( prime @ ( prime_divisor @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) ) ) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( less @ X1 @ ( prime_divisor @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X1 ) ) )
| ( prime @ ( factorial_plus_one @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ ( prime @ ( prime_divisor @ ( factorial_plus_one @ a ) ) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: $i] :
( ( prime @ X1 )
| ( prime @ ( prime_divisor @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : NUM016^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.26 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.26 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.26 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.26 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:49:37 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.26 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.33 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.35 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.G2AOlT4D5l/E---3.1_243237.p
% 0.26/0.38 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.26/0.38 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % new_ho_10 with pid 243250 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.26/0.38 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.38 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.38 % Search class: HGHNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.38 % partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.38 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting new_ho_10 with 901s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting sh5l with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 146s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % new_ho_10 with pid 243256 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.26/0.38 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.38 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.38 % Search class: HGHNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.38 % partial match(1): HGHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.38 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % Starting new_ho_10 with 901s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.38 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/0.38 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.26/0.38
% 0.26/0.38 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.38 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.38 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.38 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.26/0.38 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Initial clauses : 18
% 0.26/0.38 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 6
% 0.26/0.38 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.26/0.38 % Processed clauses : 38
% 0.26/0.38 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.26/0.38 % ...remaining for further processing : 32
% 0.26/0.38 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.26/0.38 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Generated clauses : 20
% 0.26/0.38 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.26/0.38 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Paramodulations : 20
% 0.26/0.38 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.26/0.38 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.26/0.38 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.38 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.38 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.38 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.38 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.38 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.38 % Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.26/0.38 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.26/0.38 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.38 % Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.26/0.38 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.26/0.38 % ...number of literals in the above : 7
% 0.26/0.38 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.26/0.38 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.26/0.38 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.26/0.38 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.26/0.38 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.26/0.38 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Condensation attempts : 38
% 0.26/0.38 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.38 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1328
% 0.26/0.38 % Search garbage collected termcells : 182
% 0.26/0.38
% 0.26/0.38 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.38 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.26/0.38 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.26/0.38 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.38 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.26/0.38
% 0.26/0.38 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.38 % User time : 0.020 s
% 0.26/0.38 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.26/0.38 % Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.26/0.38 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.38 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------