↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUM016-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:23:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : NUM016-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 20:43:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.41  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS derived 20 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 24 clauses.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS allocated 75603 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.41  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.41  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  
% 0.19/0.41  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 16 :
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.41  1[0:Inp] || less(u,u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  2[0:Inp] || less(u,v)*+ less(v,u)* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  6[0:Inp] ||  -> less(u,factorial_plus_one(u))*.
% 0.19/0.41  7[0:Inp] || divides(u,factorial_plus_one(v)) -> less(v,u)*.
% 0.19/0.41  8[0:Inp] ||  -> prime(u) divides(prime_divisor(u),u)*l.
% 0.19/0.41  9[0:Inp] ||  -> prime(u) prime(prime_divisor(u))*.
% 0.19/0.41  10[0:Inp] ||  -> prime(u) less(prime_divisor(u),u)*.
% 0.19/0.41  12[0:Inp] prime(u) || less(a,u) -> less(factorial_plus_one(a),u)*.
% 0.19/0.41  14[0:Res:6.0,12.1] prime(factorial_plus_one(a)) ||  -> less(factorial_plus_one(a),factorial_plus_one(a))*.
% 0.19/0.41  16[0:MRR:14.1,1.0] prime(factorial_plus_one(a)) ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.41  23[0:Res:10.1,2.0] || less(u,prime_divisor(u))* -> prime(u).
% 0.19/0.41  26[0:Res:12.2,23.0] prime(prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a))) || less(a,prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a)))* -> prime(factorial_plus_one(a)).
% 0.19/0.41  28[0:MRR:26.0,26.2,9.1,16.0] || less(a,prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a)))* -> .
% 0.19/0.41  38[0:Res:7.1,28.0] || divides(prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a)),factorial_plus_one(a))*l -> .
% 0.19/0.41  39[0:Res:8.1,38.0] ||  -> prime(factorial_plus_one(a))*.
% 0.19/0.41  41[0:MRR:39.0,16.0] ||  -> .
% 0.19/0.41  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.41  Formulae used in the proof : nothing_is_less_than_itself numbers_are_different a_prime_is_less_than_the_next_one divisor_is_smaller division_by_prime_divisor prime_divsiors smaller_prime_divisors prove_there_is_another_prime
% 0.19/0.41  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------