↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM020^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:16:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  34 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (  33 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  175 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 171   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   67 (  67   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   1 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   69 (  14   ^;  53   !;   2   ?;  69   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_25,type,
    two: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    three: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    four: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    five: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    six: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_36,type,
    mult: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    esk1_2: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_38,type,
    esk2_1: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > $i ).

thf(four_ax,axiom,
    ( four
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LqrrIMxVFU/E---3.1_617568.p',four_ax) ).

thf(three_ax,axiom,
    ( three
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LqrrIMxVFU/E---3.1_617568.p',three_ax) ).

thf(five_ax,axiom,
    ( five
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LqrrIMxVFU/E---3.1_617568.p',five_ax) ).

thf(six_ax,axiom,
    ( six
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LqrrIMxVFU/E---3.1_617568.p',six_ax) ).

thf(thm,conjecture,
    ? [X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( mult @ X3 @ three )
      = six ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LqrrIMxVFU/E---3.1_617568.p',thm) ).

thf(mult_ax,axiom,
    ( mult
    = ( ^ [X4: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X4 @ ( X3 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LqrrIMxVFU/E---3.1_617568.p',mult_ax) ).

thf(two_ax,axiom,
    ( two
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LqrrIMxVFU/E---3.1_617568.p',two_ax) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X14: $i > $i,X15: $i] :
      ( ( four @ X14 @ X15 )
      = ( X14 @ ( X14 @ ( X14 @ ( X14 @ X15 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[four_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X12: $i > $i,X13: $i] :
      ( ( three @ X12 @ X13 )
      = ( X12 @ ( X12 @ ( X12 @ X13 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[three_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X16: $i > $i,X17: $i] :
      ( ( five @ X16 @ X17 )
      = ( X16 @ ( X16 @ ( X16 @ ( X16 @ ( X16 @ X17 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[five_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X47: $i > $i,X48: $i] :
      ( ( four @ X47 @ X48 )
      = ( X47 @ ( X47 @ ( X47 @ ( X47 @ X48 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X45: $i > $i,X46: $i] :
      ( ( three @ X45 @ X46 )
      = ( X45 @ ( X45 @ ( X45 @ X46 ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X18: $i > $i,X19: $i] :
      ( ( six @ X18 @ X19 )
      = ( X18 @ ( X18 @ ( X18 @ ( X18 @ ( X18 @ ( X18 @ X19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[six_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X49: $i > $i,X50: $i] :
      ( ( five @ X49 @ X50 )
      = ( X49 @ ( X49 @ ( X49 @ ( X49 @ ( X49 @ X50 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( four @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( three @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
        ( ( mult @ X3 @ three )
        = six ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X35: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X36: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X37: $i > $i,X38: $i] :
      ( ( mult @ X35 @ X36 @ X37 @ X38 )
      = ( X35 @ ( X36 @ X37 ) @ X38 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mult_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X51: $i > $i,X52: $i] :
      ( ( six @ X51 @ X52 )
      = ( X51 @ ( X51 @ ( X51 @ ( X51 @ ( X51 @ ( X51 @ X52 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( five @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 @ ( three @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( four @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X10: $i > $i,X11: $i] :
      ( ( two @ X10 @ X11 )
      = ( X10 @ ( X10 @ X11 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[two_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X72: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( mult @ X72 @ three )
     != six ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X68: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X69: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X70: $i > $i,X71: $i] :
      ( ( mult @ X68 @ X69 @ X70 @ X71 )
      = ( X68 @ ( X69 @ X70 ) @ X71 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( six @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 @ ( four @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( five @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]),c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X43: $i > $i,X44: $i] :
      ( ( two @ X43 @ X44 )
      = ( X43 @ ( X43 @ X44 ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( mult @ X3 @ three )
     != six ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X4: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( mult @ X3 @ X4 @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X3 @ ( X4 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 @ ( five @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( six @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_15]),c_0_20]),c_0_25]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( two @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( X3 @ ( three @ ( esk1_2 @ X3 ) ) @ ( esk2_1 @ X3 ) )
     != ( six @ ( esk1_2 @ X3 ) @ ( esk2_1 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]),c_0_28]) ).

thf(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( two @ ( three @ X1 ) @ X2 )
      = ( six @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_20]),c_0_25]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM020^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:55:24 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.LqrrIMxVFU/E---3.1_617568.p
% 0.21/0.29  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.21/0.29  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMSSNHHN.
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting pre_casc_2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting new_ho_10 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % pre_casc_2 with pid 617597 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Result found by pre_casc_2
% 0.21/0.29  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMSSNHHN.
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting pre_casc_2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.29  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.29  % Search class: HUUPM-FFSF32-DHHSFMNN
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting pre_casc_2 with 901s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh2 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh9 with 146s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % sh9 with pid 617610 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Result found by sh9
% 0.21/0.29  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMSSNHHN.
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting pre_casc_2 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/0.29  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.29  % Search class: HUUPM-FFSF32-DHHSFMNN
% 0.21/0.29  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting pre_casc_2 with 901s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh2 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Starting sh9 with 146s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.29  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  % Proof found!
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.29  % Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 0.21/0.29  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Initial clauses                      : 29
% 0.21/0.29  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 14
% 0.21/0.29  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.21/0.29  % Processed clauses                    : 78
% 0.21/0.29  % ...of these trivial                  : 14
% 0.21/0.29  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % ...remaining for further processing  : 64
% 0.21/0.29  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.21/0.29  % Generated clauses                    : 655
% 0.21/0.29  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 633
% 0.21/0.29  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Paramodulations                      : 648
% 0.21/0.29  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % NegExts                              : 3
% 0.21/0.29  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Total rewrite steps                  : 397
% 0.21/0.29  % ...of those cached                   : 349
% 0.21/0.29  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.29  % Current number of processed clauses  : 48
% 0.21/0.29  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 31
% 0.21/0.29  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.21/0.29  %    Negative unit clauses             : 14
% 0.21/0.29  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 566
% 0.21/0.29  % ...number of literals in the above   : 566
% 0.21/0.29  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 0.21/0.29  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 43
% 0.21/0.29  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 666
% 0.21/0.29  % BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.21/0.29  % Condensation attempts                : 78
% 0.21/0.29  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.29  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 15758
% 0.21/0.29  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 87
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.21/0.29  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.21/0.29  
% 0.21/0.29  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.29  % User time                : 0.115 s
% 0.21/0.29  % System time              : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Total time               : 0.135 s
% 0.21/0.29  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.21/0.29  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------