↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : NUM020-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 12:22:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 58.86s 58.92s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.86s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem    : NUM020-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime   : Sun Jun 23 03:30:24 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.55/0.60  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.82/58.91  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.82/58.91  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.82/58.91  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.82/58.91  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.82/58.91  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.82/58.91  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.82/58.91  
% 58.82/58.91  % Result      :Theorem 58.260000s
% 58.82/58.91  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.260000s
% 58.82/58.91  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.82/58.92  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.82/58.92  % File     : NUM020-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 58.82/58.92  % Domain   : Number Theory
% 58.82/58.92  % Problem  : a + 1 = successor(a)
% 58.82/58.92  % Version  : [LS74] axioms :
% 58.86/58.92  %            Incomplete > Reduced > Incomplete.
% 58.86/58.92  % English  :
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  % Refs     : [LS74]  Lawrence & Starkey (1974), Experimental Tests of Resol
% 58.86/58.92  %          : [WM76]  Wilson & Minker (1976), Resolution, Refinements, and S
% 58.86/58.92  % Source   : [SPRFN]
% 58.86/58.92  % Names    : ls55 [LS74]
% 58.86/58.92  %          : ls55 [WM76]
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 58.86/58.92  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.2.0, 0.25 v6.2.0, 0.17 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.11 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.1.0, 0.19 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.1.0, 0.13 v4.0.1, 0.14 v4.0.0
% 58.86/58.92  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
% 58.86/58.92  %            Number of literals    :   17 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
% 58.86/58.92  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
% 58.86/58.92  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 58.86/58.92  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 58.86/58.92  %            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 58.86/58.92  %            Number of variables   :   17 (   2 sgn)
% 58.86/58.92  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  % Comments : Surplus transitivity axiom removed.
% 58.86/58.92  %          : This is dumb, because there is no need for the clause
% 58.86/58.92  %            prove_a_contradiction.
% 58.86/58.92  % Bugfixes : v4.0.0 - Bugfix in NUM001-0.ax
% 58.86/58.92  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.86/58.92  %----Include recursive function + and * axioms
% 58.86/58.92  include('Axioms/NUM001-0.ax').
% 58.86/58.92  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.86/58.92  cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
% 58.86/58.92      equalish(X,X) ).
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  cnf(symmetry,axiom,
% 58.86/58.92      ( ~ equalish(X,Y)
% 58.86/58.92      | equalish(Y,X) ) ).
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  cnf(transitivity,axiom,
% 58.86/58.92      ( ~ equalish(X,Y)
% 58.86/58.92      | ~ equalish(Y,Z)
% 58.86/58.92      | equalish(X,Z) ) ).
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  cnf(one_succeeds_zero,axiom,
% 58.86/58.92      equalish(n1,successor(n0)) ).
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  cnf(deny_addition_lemma,negated_conjecture,
% 58.86/58.92      ~ equalish(add(a,successor(n0)),successor(a)) ).
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  cnf(prove_a_contradiction,negated_conjecture,
% 58.86/58.92      ~ equalish(successor(A),n0) ).
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.86/58.92  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.86/58.92  % Proof found
% 58.86/58.92  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.86/58.92  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.86/58.92  %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.86/58.92  %VarNum:33(SingletonVarNum:17)
% 58.86/58.92  %MaxLitNum:3
% 58.86/58.92  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 58.86/58.92  %SharedTerms:8
% 58.86/58.92  %goalClause: 7 8
% 58.86/58.92  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 58.86/58.92  [2]P1(a1,f6(a2))
% 58.86/58.92  [8]~P1(f4(a5,f6(a2)),f6(a5))
% 58.86/58.92  [1]P1(x11,x11)
% 58.86/58.92  [3]P1(f3(x31,a2),a2)
% 58.86/58.92  [4]P1(f4(x41,a2),x41)
% 58.86/58.92  [7]~P1(f6(x71),a2)
% 58.86/58.92  [5]P1(f4(x51,f6(x52)),f6(f4(x51,x52)))
% 58.86/58.92  [6]P1(f3(x61,f6(x62)),f4(f3(x61,x62),x61))
% 58.86/58.92  [9]~P1(x92,x91)+P1(x91,x92)
% 58.86/58.92  [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P1(f6(x101),f6(x102))
% 58.86/58.92  [11]P1(x111,x112)+~P1(f6(x111),f6(x112))
% 58.86/58.92  [12]~P1(x121,x123)+P1(x121,x122)+~P1(x123,x122)
% 58.86/58.92  %EqnAxiom
% 58.86/58.92  
% 58.86/58.92  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(13,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(a2,f6(x131))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(18,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(a1,a2)),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,13,12,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(19,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(a2,a1)),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(21,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (P1(f6(f6(a2)),f6(a1))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,9,10])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(24,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(a1),f6(a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,9,11])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(25,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(a2),f6(a1))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(36,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(a1),f4(f6(a2),a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[18,4,11,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(39,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(a2,f4(a1,a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,19,36,9,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(43,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f4(a1,a2),a2)),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[39,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(48,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(a2),f6(f4(a1,a2)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[43,11,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(49,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(f4(a1,a2)),f6(a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[48,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(51,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(a2),f4(f6(f4(a1,a2)),a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,48,9,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(57,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(a2),f4(f6(a1),a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,25,51,9,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(75,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f4(a1,a2),f4(a2,a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,43,57,9,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(79,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f4(a2,a2),f4(a1,a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[75,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(84,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(f4(a1,a2)),f6(f4(a2,a2)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[79,11,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(85,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(f4(a2,a2)),f6(f4(a1,a2)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[84,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(94,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f4(a1,f6(a2)),f6(f4(a2,a2)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[85,5,12,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(110,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(a1,f6(f4(a1,a2)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[49,2,12,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(112,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(f6(f4(a1,a2))),f6(a1))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[110,11,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(115,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f4(a1,f6(a2)),f4(a2,f6(a2)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[112,94,5,9,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(121,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f4(a2,a2),f4(f4(a1,a2),a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,79,115,9,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(127,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(x1271),f3(x1272,a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,121,3,9,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(246,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (P1(f4(f3(x2461,x2462),x2461),f3(x2461,f6(x2462)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,1,12,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(416,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(x4161),f4(f3(x4162,a2),a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[127,4,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(720,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f3(a2,f6(a2)),f6(x7201))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[416,6,12,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(722,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f3(a2,f6(a2)),a1)),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[720,2,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(1331,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (P1(f6(x13311),f6(f4(x13311,a2)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,10,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(1334,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (P1(f3(a2,x13341),f3(a2,f6(x13341)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[1331,246,11,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(1339,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (P1(f6(a1),f6(f6(a2)))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,1,12,9])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(1360,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (P1(a1,f4(f6(a2),a2))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[1339,1331,12,11])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(1394,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     (~P1(f6(f4(a5,a2)),f6(a5))),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,722,1334,1360,5,10,11,9,12])).
% 58.86/58.93  cnf(1421,plain,
% 58.86/58.93     ($false),
% 58.86/58.93     inference(scs_inference,[],[1394,4,10]),
% 58.86/58.93     ['proof']).
% 58.86/58.93  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.86/58.93  % Total time :58.260000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------