↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM021^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:16:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.63s 0.86s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  26 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (  37 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  174 (  10   ~;   4   |;   2   &; 158   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :  117 ( 117   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (  12   ^;  49   !;   2   ?;  63   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_24,type,
    one: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    two: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    three: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    five: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_35,type,
    plus: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    esk1_2: ( ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_41,type,
    esk5_1: ( ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > $i ).

thf(thm,conjecture,
    ? [X5: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( X5 @ two @ three )
        = five )
      & ( ( X5 @ one @ two )
        = three ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PyK6otC2HG/E---3.1_613697.p',thm) ).

thf(two_ax,axiom,
    ( two
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PyK6otC2HG/E---3.1_613697.p',two_ax) ).

thf(one_ax,axiom,
    ( one
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PyK6otC2HG/E---3.1_613697.p',one_ax) ).

thf(plus_ax,axiom,
    ( plus
    = ( ^ [X4: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X4 @ X1 @ ( X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PyK6otC2HG/E---3.1_613697.p',plus_ax) ).

thf(three_ax,axiom,
    ( three
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PyK6otC2HG/E---3.1_613697.p',three_ax) ).

thf(five_ax,axiom,
    ( five
    = ( ^ [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] : ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PyK6otC2HG/E---3.1_613697.p',five_ax) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X5: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
        ( ( ( X5 @ two @ three )
          = five )
        & ( ( X5 @ one @ two )
          = three ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X11: $i > $i,X12: $i] :
      ( ( two @ X11 @ X12 )
      = ( X11 @ ( X11 @ X12 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[two_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X73: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( X73 @ two @ three )
       != five )
      | ( ( X73 @ one @ two )
       != three ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X9: $i > $i,X10: $i] :
      ( ( one @ X9 @ X10 )
      = ( X9 @ X10 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[one_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X32: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X33: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X34: $i > $i,X35: $i] :
      ( ( plus @ X32 @ X33 @ X34 @ X35 )
      = ( X32 @ X34 @ ( X33 @ X34 @ X35 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[plus_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X44: $i > $i,X45: $i] :
      ( ( two @ X44 @ X45 )
      = ( X44 @ ( X44 @ X45 ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X13: $i > $i,X14: $i] :
      ( ( three @ X13 @ X14 )
      = ( X13 @ ( X13 @ ( X13 @ X14 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[three_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( X5 @ two @ three )
       != five )
      | ( ( X5 @ one @ two )
       != three ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X42: $i > $i,X43: $i] :
      ( ( one @ X42 @ X43 )
      = ( X42 @ X43 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X65: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X66: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X67: $i > $i,X68: $i] :
      ( ( plus @ X65 @ X66 @ X67 @ X68 )
      = ( X65 @ X67 @ ( X66 @ X67 @ X68 ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( two @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X46: $i > $i,X47: $i] :
      ( ( three @ X46 @ X47 )
      = ( X46 @ ( X46 @ ( X46 @ X47 ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X17: $i > $i,X18: $i] :
      ( ( five @ X17 @ X18 )
      = ( X17 @ ( X17 @ ( X17 @ ( X17 @ ( X17 @ X18 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[five_ax])]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( X5 @ one @ two @ ( esk1_2 @ X5 ) )
       != ( three @ ( esk1_2 @ X5 ) ) )
      | ( ( X5 @ two @ three )
       != five ) ),
    inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( one @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X4: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( plus @ X3 @ X4 @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X3 @ X1 @ ( X4 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( two @ X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( X1 @ ( two @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( three @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X50: $i > $i,X51: $i] :
      ( ( five @ X50 @ X51 )
      = ( X50 @ ( X50 @ ( X50 @ ( X50 @ ( X50 @ X51 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X5: ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i ) > ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i] :
      ( ( ( X5 @ one @ two @ ( esk1_2 @ X5 ) @ ( esk5_1 @ X5 ) )
       != ( three @ ( esk1_2 @ X5 ) @ ( esk5_1 @ X5 ) ) )
      | ( ( X5 @ two @ three )
       != five ) ),
    inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X3: ( $i > $i ) > $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( plus @ one @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ ( X3 @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 @ ( two @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = ( three @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( five @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( plus @ two @ three )
   != five ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X1: $i > $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 @ ( X1 @ ( three @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
      = ( five @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),c_0_21]),c_0_16]),c_0_30])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM021^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.6.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 11:52:09 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.PyK6otC2HG/E---3.1_613697.p
% 3.63/0.86  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 3.63/0.86  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMSSNHHA.
% 3.63/0.86  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 300s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % new_ho_10 with pid 613710 completed with status 0
% 3.63/0.86  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 3.63/0.86  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMSSNHHA.
% 3.63/0.86  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.63/0.86  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.63/0.86  % Search class: HUHPM-FFSF32-DHHSFMNN
% 3.63/0.86  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting new_ho_10 with 901s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 151s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting sh4l with 151s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift with 146s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % new_ho_10 with pid 613715 completed with status 0
% 3.63/0.86  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 3.63/0.86  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSMSSNHHA.
% 3.63/0.86  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.63/0.86  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.63/0.86  % Search class: HUHPM-FFSF32-DHHSFMNN
% 3.63/0.86  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 151s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % Starting new_ho_10 with 901s (1) cores
% 3.63/0.86  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 3.63/0.86  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.63/0.86  
% 3.63/0.86  % Proof found!
% 3.63/0.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.63/0.86  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.63/0.87  % Parsed axioms                        : 29
% 3.63/0.87  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Initial clauses                      : 29
% 3.63/0.87  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 14
% 3.63/0.87  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 3.63/0.87  % Processed clauses                    : 479
% 3.63/0.87  % ...of these trivial                  : 108
% 3.63/0.87  % ...subsumed                          : 16
% 3.63/0.87  % ...remaining for further processing  : 354
% 3.63/0.87  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Backward-rewritten                   : 75
% 3.63/0.87  % Generated clauses                    : 13221
% 3.63/0.87  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11416
% 3.63/0.87  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Paramodulations                      : 13032
% 3.63/0.87  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % NegExts                              : 91
% 3.63/0.87  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Total rewrite steps                  : 23905
% 3.63/0.87  % ...of those cached                   : 19507
% 3.63/0.87  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.63/0.87  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.63/0.87  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.63/0.87  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.63/0.87  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.63/0.87  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.63/0.87  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.63/0.87  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.63/0.87  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.63/0.87  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.63/0.87  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.63/0.87  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.63/0.87  % Current number of processed clauses  : 264
% 3.63/0.87  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 126
% 3.63/0.87  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 15
% 3.63/0.87  %    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 3.63/0.87  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 117
% 3.63/0.87  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10761
% 3.63/0.87  % ...number of literals in the above   : 10761
% 3.63/0.87  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Current number of archived clauses   : 90
% 3.63/0.87  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10171
% 3.63/0.87  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6079
% 3.63/0.87  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 658
% 3.63/0.87  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 29033
% 3.63/0.87  % BW rewrite match successes           : 96
% 3.63/0.87  % Condensation attempts                : 479
% 3.63/0.87  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 3.63/0.87  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 717215
% 3.63/0.87  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 98
% 3.63/0.87  
% 3.63/0.87  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.63/0.87  % User time                : 0.559 s
% 3.63/0.87  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 3.63/0.87  % Total time               : 0.577 s
% 3.63/0.87  % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 3.63/0.87  
% 3.63/0.87  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.63/0.87  % User time                : 2.328 s
% 3.63/0.87  % System time              : 0.118 s
% 3.63/0.87  % Total time               : 2.445 s
% 3.63/0.87  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 3.63/0.87  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------