↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM024-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:08:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.76s 1.55s
% Output   : Refutation 2.76s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  17 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  222 (  22   ~;  20   |;   0   &; 180   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   0   ^;  60   !;   0   ?;  60   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(equalish_decl,type,
    equalish: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(successor_decl,type,
    successor: $i > $i ).

thf(n0_decl,type,
    n0: $i ).

thf(less_decl,type,
    less: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(add_decl,type,
    add: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(multiply_decl,type,
    multiply: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd_decl,type,
    predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ add ) @ ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ equalish ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_plus) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ add ) @ ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ equalish ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ equalish ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ equalish ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ successor @ ( B @ successor @ ( A @ add ) @ equalish ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',addition) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ successor @ ( B @ successor @ ( A @ add ) @ equalish ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ multiply ) @ add ) @ ( B @ successor @ ( A @ multiply ) @ equalish ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',times) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ multiply ) @ add ) @ ( B @ successor @ ( A @ multiply ) @ equalish ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( C @ less ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( C @ less ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_less) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( C @ less ) )
      | ~ ( A @ ( C @ less ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( n0 @ ( n0 @ ( A @ multiply ) @ equalish ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',times_zero) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( n0 @ ( n0 @ ( A @ multiply ) @ equalish ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ successor @ add ) @ equalish ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',smaller_number) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ successor @ add ) @ equalish ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( n0 @ ( A @ successor @ equalish ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_a_contradiction) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( n0 @ ( A @ successor @ equalish ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ successor @ ( A @ successor @ equalish ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',successor_equality1) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ successor @ ( A @ successor @ equalish ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ ( A @ ( B @ predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd ) @ successor @ add ) @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_lemma) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ ( A @ ( B @ predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd ) @ successor @ add ) @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( C @ add ) @ ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ equalish ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',plus_substitution) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( C @ add ) @ ( B @ ( A @ add ) @ equalish ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ successor @ ( A @ successor @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',successor_substitution) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ successor @ ( A @ successor @ equalish ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ equalish ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( n0 @ ( A @ add ) @ equalish ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',adding_zero) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( n0 @ ( A @ add ) @ equalish ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    a @ ( a @ less ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',impossible_a_is_less_than_itself) ).

thf(19,plain,
    a @ ( a @ less ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[22,31,37,25,20,29,28,38,17,32,34,40,26,23,36,19]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM024-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.39  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 01:53:48 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.39  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.58/0.69  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.72/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (96ms). 
% 0.72/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.23/0.98  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.23/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.23/1.02  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 15 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.52/1.05  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 15 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.52/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.52/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.52/1.07  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.76/1.54  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.76/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.76/1.54  % Time passed: 1055ms (effective reasoning time: 744ms)
% 2.76/1.54  % Axioms used in derivation (15): smaller_number, less_lemma, reflexivity, addition, times_zero, times, adding_zero, transitivity, symmetry, commutativity_of_plus, successor_equality1, impossible_a_is_less_than_itself, successor_substitution, transitivity_of_less, plus_substitution
% 2.76/1.54  % No. of inferences in proof: 33
% 2.76/1.55  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1055 ms resp. 744 ms w/o parsing
% 2.76/1.60  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.76/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------