↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM042-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 5.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   39 (  20 unt;   3 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   61 (  11 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(irreflexive2,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(restrict(X1,X2,X2),complement(identity_relation))
    | irreflexive(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',irreflexive2) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(prove_irreflexive_class_property4_1,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,complement(identity_relation)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_irreflexive_class_property4_1) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(restriction1,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).

cnf(restriction2,axiom,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction2) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(prove_irreflexive_class_property4_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ irreflexive(x,domain_of(symmetrization_of(x))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_irreflexive_class_property4_2) ).

cnf(symmetrization,axiom,
    union(X1,inverse(X1)) = symmetrization_of(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',symmetrization) ).

cnf(inverse,axiom,
    domain_of(flip(cross_product(X1,universal_class))) = inverse(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',inverse) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(restrict(X1,X2,X2),complement(identity_relation))
    | irreflexive(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexive2]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,complement(identity_relation)),
    prove_irreflexive_class_property4_1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(restrict(X1,X2,X2),complement(identity_relation))
    | irreflexive(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    restriction1 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = restrict(X3,X1,X2),
    restriction2 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,x)
    | member(X1,complement(identity_relation)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ irreflexive(x,domain_of(symmetrization_of(x))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_irreflexive_class_property4_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X2)),complement(identity_relation))
    | irreflexive(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X3) = intersection(X3,cross_product(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(identity_relation)),x)
    | subclass(X1,complement(identity_relation)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X3)
    | member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ irreflexive(x,domain_of(symmetrization_of(x))),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    union(X1,inverse(X1)) = symmetrization_of(X1),
    symmetrization ).

cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
    domain_of(flip(cross_product(X1,universal_class))) = inverse(X1),
    inverse ).

cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    union ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(intersection(cross_product(X2,X2),X1),complement(identity_relation))
    | irreflexive(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(intersection(X1,x),complement(identity_relation)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ irreflexive(x,domain_of(complement(intersection(complement(x),complement(domain_of(flip(cross_product(x,universal_class)))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    irreflexive(x,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM042-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.39  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.39  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:00:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/5.39  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.46  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.62  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/5.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 4008426 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/5.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/5.62  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/5.62  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.62  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % SubtermCWHack with pid 4008433 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/5.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/5.62  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/5.62  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.62  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/5.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.62  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.16/5.62  
% 0.16/5.62  % Proof found!
% 0.16/5.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/5.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/5.62  % Parsed axioms                        : 160
% 0.16/5.62  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Initial clauses                      : 160
% 0.16/5.62  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
% 0.16/5.62  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 141
% 0.16/5.62  % Processed clauses                    : 682
% 0.16/5.62  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.16/5.62  % ...subsumed                          : 326
% 0.16/5.62  % ...remaining for further processing  : 354
% 0.16/5.62  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.16/5.62  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Backward-subsumed                    : 15
% 0.16/5.62  % Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.16/5.62  % Generated clauses                    : 1693
% 0.16/5.62  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1375
% 0.16/5.62  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 0.16/5.62  % Paramodulations                      : 1687
% 0.16/5.62  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.16/5.62  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Total rewrite steps                  : 560
% 0.16/5.62  % ...of those cached                   : 478
% 0.16/5.62  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/5.62  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/5.62  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/5.62  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/5.62  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/5.62  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/5.62  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/5.62  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/5.62  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/5.62  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/5.62  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/5.62  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/5.62  % Current number of processed clauses  : 329
% 0.16/5.62  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 56
% 0.16/5.62  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.16/5.62  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.16/5.62  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 271
% 0.16/5.62  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 817
% 0.16/5.62  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2457
% 0.16/5.62  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Current number of archived clauses   : 38
% 0.16/5.62  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7353
% 0.16/5.62  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5392
% 0.16/5.62  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 282
% 0.16/5.62  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 325
% 0.16/5.62  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 23
% 0.16/5.62  % BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.16/5.62  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/5.62  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 27703
% 0.16/5.62  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 287
% 0.16/5.62  
% 0.16/5.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.62  % User time                : 0.084 s
% 0.16/5.62  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.16/5.62  % Total time               : 0.096 s
% 0.16/5.62  % Maximum resident set size: 4036 pages
% 0.16/5.62  
% 0.16/5.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.62  % User time                : 0.312 s
% 0.16/5.62  % System time              : 0.041 s
% 0.16/5.62  % Total time               : 0.353 s
% 0.16/5.62  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.16/5.62  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------