↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM071-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 277.87s 36.78s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 277.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   49 (  20 unt;   7 nHn;  34 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  101 (  15 equ;  50 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   88 (  12 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(unordered_pair_member,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair_member) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(well_ordering3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ well_ordering(X1,X2)
    | member(least(X1,X3),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',well_ordering3) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(prove_well_ordering_is_irreflexive_1,negated_conjecture,
    well_ordering(xr,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_well_ordering_is_irreflexive_1) ).

cnf(prove_well_ordering_is_irreflexive_3,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_well_ordering_is_irreflexive_3) ).

cnf(unordered_pair3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair3) ).

cnf(well_ordering5,axiom,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair(X4,least(X1,X3)),X1)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ well_ordering(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',well_ordering5) ).

cnf(ordered_pair,axiom,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,singleton(X2))) = ordered_pair(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',ordered_pair) ).

cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

cnf(prove_well_ordering_is_irreflexive_2,negated_conjecture,
    member(ordered_pair(u,u),xr),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_well_ordering_is_irreflexive_2) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_member]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | not_subclass_element(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X2
    | not_subclass_element(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ well_ordering(X1,X2)
    | member(least(X1,X3),X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[well_ordering3]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2)
    | not_subclass_element(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) = X1 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ well_ordering(X1,X2)
    | member(least(X1,X3),X3) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    well_ordering(xr,y),
    prove_well_ordering_is_irreflexive_1 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,y),
    prove_well_ordering_is_irreflexive_3 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair3]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair(X4,least(X1,X3)),X1)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ well_ordering(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[well_ordering5]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,singleton(X2))) = ordered_pair(X1,X2),
    ordered_pair ).

cnf(c_0_32,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    singleton_set ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subclass(X1,y)
    | ~ member(X2,X1)
    | member(least(xr,X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(unordered_pair(u,u),y),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair(X4,least(X1,X3)),X1)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ well_ordering(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2))) = ordered_pair(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(u,u))
    | member(least(xr,unordered_pair(u,u)),unordered_pair(u,u)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,unordered_pair(X1,u)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X4),unordered_pair(X4,unordered_pair(least(X1,X3),least(X1,X3)))),X1)
    | ~ well_ordering(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    member(least(xr,unordered_pair(u,u)),unordered_pair(u,u)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,y)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(least(xr,X2),least(xr,X2)))),xr) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    least(xr,unordered_pair(u,u)) = u,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    member(ordered_pair(u,u),xr),
    prove_well_ordering_is_irreflexive_2 ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(u,u))
    | ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(u,u))),xr) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_34]),c_0_44]),c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(u,u),unordered_pair(u,unordered_pair(u,u))),xr),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_40]),c_0_47])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM071-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:02:54 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 277.87/36.78  % Version: 3.5.1
% 277.87/36.78  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 277.87/36.78  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 4114250 completed with status 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 277.87/36.78  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 277.87/36.78  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 277.87/36.78  % No SInE strategy applied
% 277.87/36.78  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 277.87/36.78  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % new_bool_3 with pid 4114259 completed with status 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 277.87/36.78  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 277.87/36.78  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 277.87/36.78  % No SInE strategy applied
% 277.87/36.78  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 277.87/36.78  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 277.87/36.78  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 277.87/36.78  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 277.87/36.78  
% 277.87/36.78  % Proof found!
% 277.87/36.78  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 277.87/36.78  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 277.87/36.78  % Parsed axioms                        : 161
% 277.87/36.78  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Initial clauses                      : 161
% 277.87/36.78  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
% 277.87/36.78  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 142
% 277.87/36.78  % Processed clauses                    : 16557
% 277.87/36.78  % ...of these trivial                  : 310
% 277.87/36.78  % ...subsumed                          : 7375
% 277.87/36.78  % ...remaining for further processing  : 8872
% 277.87/36.78  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
% 277.87/36.78  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Backward-subsumed                    : 233
% 277.87/36.78  % Backward-rewritten                   : 140
% 277.87/36.78  % Generated clauses                    : 1331083
% 277.87/36.78  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1315210
% 277.87/36.78  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 277.87/36.78  % Paramodulations                      : 1331067
% 277.87/36.78  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 277.87/36.78  % NegExts                              : 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Equation resolutions                 : 12
% 277.87/36.78  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Total rewrite steps                  : 75486
% 277.87/36.78  % ...of those cached                   : 72217
% 277.87/36.78  % Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 277.87/36.78  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 277.87/36.78  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 277.87/36.78  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 277.87/36.78  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 277.87/36.78  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 277.87/36.78  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 277.87/36.78  %    Propositional encoding time       : 1.786
% 277.87/36.78  %    Propositional solver time         : 1.422
% 277.87/36.78  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 277.87/36.78  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 277.87/36.78  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 277.87/36.78  % Current number of processed clauses  : 8352
% 277.87/36.78  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2656
% 277.87/36.78  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 277.87/36.78  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2489
% 277.87/36.78  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3204
% 277.87/36.78  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1298628
% 277.87/36.78  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1798629
% 277.87/36.78  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Current number of archived clauses   : 533
% 277.87/36.78  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 520459
% 277.87/36.78  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 404093
% 277.87/36.78  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4840
% 277.87/36.78  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 371285
% 277.87/36.78  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 14
% 277.87/36.78  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 299456
% 277.87/36.78  % BW rewrite match successes           : 104
% 277.87/36.78  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 277.87/36.78  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 34792875
% 277.87/36.78  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 285
% 277.87/36.78  
% 277.87/36.78  % -------------------------------------------------
% 277.87/36.78  % User time                : 33.918 s
% 277.87/36.78  % System time              : 1.766 s
% 277.87/36.78  % Total time               : 35.684 s
% 277.87/36.78  % Maximum resident set size: 4036 pages
% 277.87/36.78  
% 277.87/36.78  % -------------------------------------------------
% 277.87/36.78  % User time                : 171.224 s
% 277.87/36.78  % System time              : 5.821 s
% 277.87/36.78  % Total time               : 177.045 s
% 277.87/36.78  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 277.87/36.78  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------