↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM078-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.58s 0.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   40 (  10 unt;  10 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   82 (  24 equ;  35 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (  10 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(regularity1,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).

cnf(unordered_pair_member,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair_member) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(regularity2,axiom,
    ( intersection(X1,regular(X1)) = null_class
    | X1 = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity2) ).

cnf(unordered_pair2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair2) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_2_to_well_ordering_property7_3,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,intersection(u,y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2_to_well_ordering_property7_3) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    regularity1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(regular(complement(X1)),X1)
    | complement(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( member(regular(X1),universal_class)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_member]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection3]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    complement(universal_class) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( intersection(X1,regular(X1)) = null_class
    | X1 = null_class ),
    regularity2 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ member(X1,null_class),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_21]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(X1,X2) = null_class
    | regular(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X2
    | regular(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ member(X2,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,regular(X1))
    | X1 = null_class ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(X1,X1) = null_class
    | regular(unordered_pair(X1,X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair2]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection1]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(X2,X1)
    | ~ member(X2,unordered_pair(X1,X1))
    | unordered_pair(X1,X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,intersection(u,y)),
    prove_corollary_2_to_well_ordering_property7_3 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X1)
    | unordered_pair(X1,X1) = null_class ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,u),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(u,u) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM078-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:58:11 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.58/0.96  % Version: 3.5.1
% 3.58/0.96  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.58/0.96  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1189377 completed with status 0
% 3.58/0.96  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 3.58/0.96  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.58/0.96  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.58/0.96  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.58/0.96  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 3.58/0.96  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % sh5l with pid 1189388 completed with status 0
% 3.58/0.96  % Result found by sh5l
% 3.58/0.96  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 3.58/0.96  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 3.58/0.96  % No SInE strategy applied
% 3.58/0.96  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 3.58/0.96  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 3.58/0.96  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 3.58/0.96  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.58/0.96  
% 3.58/0.96  % Proof found!
% 3.58/0.96  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.58/0.96  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.58/0.96  % Parsed axioms                        : 161
% 3.58/0.96  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 3.58/0.96  % Initial clauses                      : 161
% 3.58/0.96  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
% 3.58/0.96  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 142
% 3.58/0.96  % Processed clauses                    : 3740
% 3.58/0.96  % ...of these trivial                  : 17
% 3.58/0.96  % ...subsumed                          : 2331
% 3.58/0.96  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1392
% 3.58/0.96  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
% 3.58/0.96  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.58/0.96  % Backward-subsumed                    : 56
% 3.58/0.96  % Backward-rewritten                   : 60
% 3.58/0.96  % Generated clauses                    : 13550
% 3.58/0.96  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12056
% 3.58/0.96  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.58/0.96  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 25
% 3.58/0.96  % Paramodulations                      : 13536
% 3.58/0.96  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 3.58/0.96  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.58/0.96  % Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 3.58/0.96  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.58/0.96  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4586
% 3.58/0.96  % ...of those cached                   : 4260
% 3.58/0.96  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.58/0.96  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.58/0.96  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.58/0.96  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.58/0.96  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.58/0.96  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.58/0.96  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.58/0.96  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.58/0.96  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.58/0.96  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.58/0.96  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.58/0.96  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.58/0.96  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1129
% 3.58/0.96  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 122
% 3.58/0.96  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 3.58/0.96  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 3.58/0.96  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1000
% 3.58/0.96  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8337
% 3.58/0.96  % ...number of literals in the above   : 27322
% 3.58/0.96  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.58/0.96  % Current number of archived clauses   : 276
% 3.58/0.96  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 82737
% 3.58/0.96  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65599
% 3.58/0.96  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2000
% 3.58/0.96  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1719
% 3.58/0.96  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 20
% 3.58/0.96  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 98
% 3.58/0.96  % BW rewrite match successes           : 28
% 3.58/0.96  % Condensation attempts                : 3740
% 3.58/0.96  % Condensation successes               : 101
% 3.58/0.96  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 278165
% 3.58/0.96  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 285
% 3.58/0.96  
% 3.58/0.96  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.58/0.96  % User time                : 0.450 s
% 3.58/0.96  % System time              : 0.023 s
% 3.58/0.96  % Total time               : 0.473 s
% 3.58/0.96  % Maximum resident set size: 4036 pages
% 3.58/0.96  
% 3.58/0.96  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.58/0.96  % User time                : 2.267 s
% 3.58/0.96  % System time              : 0.129 s
% 3.58/0.96  % Total time               : 2.396 s
% 3.58/0.96  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 3.58/0.96  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------