↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM139-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:23:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.38s 1.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (  10   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn  32   !;   0   ?;  11   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : intersection(X0,cross_product(X1,X2)) = restrict(X0,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : intersection(cross_product(X0,X1),X2) = restrict(X2,X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction2) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    ! [X0] : domain_of(inverse(X0)) = range_of(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',range_of) ).

fof(f43,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : range_of(restrict(X0,X1,universal_class)) = image(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',image) ).

fof(f56,axiom,
    ! [X0] : complement(image(element_relation,complement(X0))) = power_class(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',power_class_definition) ).

fof(f176,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(intersection(power_class(x),z),x),z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_complete_induction3_1) ).

fof(f177,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(intersection(power_class(x),z),x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_complete_induction3_2) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : image(X0,X1) = domain_of(inverse(intersection(cross_product(X1,universal_class),X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f43,f40,f29]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ! [X0] : power_class(X0) = complement(domain_of(inverse(intersection(cross_product(complement(X0),universal_class),element_relation)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f56,f179]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(domain_of(inverse(intersection(cross_product(complement(x),universal_class),element_relation)))),z),x),z),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f176,f180]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ~ subclass(intersection(complement(domain_of(inverse(intersection(cross_product(complement(x),universal_class),element_relation)))),z),x),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f177,f180]) ).

fof(f184,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : intersection(X0,cross_product(X1,X2)) = intersection(cross_product(X1,X2),X0),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f28,f29]) ).

tcf(c_209,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(domain_of(inverse(intersection(cross_product(complement(x),universal_class),element_relation)))),z),x),z),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f182]) ).

tcf(c_210,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(intersection(complement(domain_of(inverse(intersection(cross_product(complement(x),universal_class),element_relation)))),z),x),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f183]) ).

tcf(c_212,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_214,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : intersection(cross_product(X0,X1),X2) = intersection(X2,cross_product(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f184]) ).

tcf(c_216,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_584,plain,
    ~ subclass(intersection(complement(domain_of(inverse(intersection(element_relation,cross_product(complement(x),universal_class))))),z),x),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_210,c_214]) ).

tcf(c_618,plain,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(domain_of(inverse(intersection(element_relation,cross_product(complement(x),universal_class))))),z),x),z),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_209,c_214]) ).

tcf(c_1378,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( subclass(intersection(X0,X1),X2)
      | member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X0,X1),X2),X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_212,c_216]) ).

tcf(c_1506,plain,
    subclass(intersection(complement(domain_of(inverse(intersection(element_relation,cross_product(complement(x),universal_class))))),z),x),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1378,c_618]) ).

tcf(c_1507,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1506,c_584]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : NUM139-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.18/0.44  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.44  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:01:49 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.24/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.52  
% 0.24/0.52  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.24/0.52  
% 0.24/0.52  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.24/0.54  % Proving...
% 4.38/1.52  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.38/1.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.38/1.52  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.38/1.52  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 7  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Proving...
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % 
% 4.38/1.52  % clauses                               29
% 4.38/1.52  % conjectures                           0
% 4.38/1.52  % EPR                                   4
% 4.38/1.52  % Horn                                  26
% 4.38/1.52  % unary                                 7
% 4.38/1.52  % binary                                13
% 4.38/1.52  % lits                                  61
% 4.38/1.52  % lits eq                               4
% 4.38/1.52  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.38/1.52  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.38/1.52  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.38/1.52  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 4.38/1.52  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ 
% 4.38/1.52  % Current options:
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ 
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % 
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % ------ Proving...
% 4.38/1.52  % 
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.38/1.52  
% 4.38/1.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------