↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM141-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:23:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.30s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  16   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn  23   !;   0   ?;   9   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,unordered_pair(X0,X1))
      | ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair2) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(X0,complement(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

fof(f25,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,X1)
      | member(X0,complement(X1))
      | ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : complement(intersection(complement(X0),complement(X1))) = union(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).

fof(f44,axiom,
    ! [X0] : union(X0,singleton(X0)) = successor(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',successor) ).

fof(f176,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_successor_of_set_is_set2_1) ).

fof(f177,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,successor(x)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_successor_of_set_is_set2_2) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ! [X0] : successor(X0) = complement(intersection(complement(X0),complement(unordered_pair(X0,X0)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f44,f26,f12]) ).

fof(f268,plain,
    ~ member(x,complement(intersection(complement(x),complement(unordered_pair(x,x))))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f177,f183]) ).

tcf(c_217,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( member(X0,unordered_pair(X0,X1))
      | ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_228,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_230,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ member(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(X0,complement(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

tcf(c_231,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( member(X0,X1)
      | member(X0,complement(X1))
      | ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

tcf(c_344,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

tcf(c_345,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,complement(intersection(complement(x),complement(unordered_pair(x,x))))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f268]) ).

tcf(c_404,plain,
    ( member(x,intersection(complement(x),complement(unordered_pair(x,x))))
    | ~ member(x,universal_class) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_231,c_345]) ).

tcf(c_459,plain,
    member(x,intersection(complement(x),complement(unordered_pair(x,x)))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_404,c_344,c_404]) ).

tcf(c_462,plain,
    member(x,complement(unordered_pair(x,x))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_459,c_228]) ).

tcf(c_576,plain,
    ~ member(x,unordered_pair(x,x)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_462,c_230]) ).

tcf(c_938,plain,
    ~ member(x,universal_class),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_217,c_576]) ).

tcf(c_940,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_344,c_938]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM141-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:01:28 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 4.30/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.30/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.30/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.30/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 4.30/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 4.30/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % 
% 4.30/1.28  % clauses                               137
% 4.30/1.28  % conjectures                           2
% 4.30/1.28  % EPR                                   21
% 4.30/1.28  % Horn                                  125
% 4.30/1.28  % unary                                 27
% 4.30/1.28  % binary                                76
% 4.30/1.28  % lits                                  295
% 4.30/1.28  % lits eq                               42
% 4.30/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.30/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.30/1.28  % fd_cond                               5
% 4.30/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        11
% 4.30/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % ------ 
% 4.30/1.28  % Current options:
% 4.30/1.28  % ------ 
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % 
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 4.30/1.28  % 
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.30/1.28  
% 4.30/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------