↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM180-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:23:27 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.53s 1.98s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   8   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?;   9   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

fof(f155,axiom,
    intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) = limit_ordinals,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',limit_ordinals) ).

fof(f176,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_limit_ordinals_are_ordinals_1) ).

tcf(c_209,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_210,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_227,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

tcf(c_325,plain,
    intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) = limit_ordinals,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f155]) ).

tcf(c_343,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176]) ).

tcf(c_4621,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_343]) ).

tcf(c_5934,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(X0,ordinal_numbers)
      | ~ member(X0,limit_ordinals) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_325,c_227]) ).

tcf(c_5970,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( subclass(limit_ordinals,X0)
      | member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,X0),ordinal_numbers) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_209,c_5934]) ).

tcf(c_5994,plain,
    subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5970,c_210]) ).

tcf(c_5995,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5994,c_4621]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : NUM180-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/0.43  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.43  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:08:34 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.44  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.16/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.51  
% 0.25/0.51  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.25/0.51  
% 0.25/0.52  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.25/0.53  % Proving...
% 6.53/1.98  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 6.53/1.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  % ------  iProver source info
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 6.53/1.98  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 6.53/1.98  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 6.53/1.98  % ------ Proving...
% 6.53/1.98  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 6.53/1.98  
% 6.53/1.98  % 
% 6.53/1.98  % clauses                               115
% 6.53/1.98  % conjectures                           1
% 6.53/1.98  % EPR                                   15
% 6.53/1.98  % Horn                                  103
% 6.53/1.98  % unary                                 26
% 6.53/1.98  % binary                                58
% 6.53/1.99  % lits                                  249
% 6.53/1.99  % lits eq                               39
% 6.53/1.99  % fd_pure                               0
% 6.53/1.99  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 6.53/1.99  % fd_cond                               5
% 6.53/1.99  % fd_pseudo_cond                        10
% 6.53/1.99  % AC symbols                            0
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  % ------ 
% 6.53/1.99  % Current options:
% 6.53/1.99  % ------ 
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  % 
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  % ------ Proving...
% 6.53/1.99  % 
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.53/1.99  
% 6.53/1.99  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------