↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM181-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   47 (  28 unt;   4 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   72 (  18 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).

cnf(prove_null_class_is_not_a_limit_ordinal_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(null_class,limit_ordinals),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_null_class_is_not_a_limit_ordinal_1) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(image,axiom,
    range_of(restrict(X1,X2,universal_class)) = image(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',image) ).

cnf(range_of,axiom,
    domain_of(inverse(X1)) = range_of(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',range_of) ).

cnf(restriction1,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',restriction1) ).

cnf(limit_ordinals,axiom,
    intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) = limit_ordinals,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',limit_ordinals) ).

cnf(unordered_pair3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair3) ).

cnf(kind_1_ordinals,axiom,
    union(singleton(null_class),image(successor_relation,ordinal_numbers)) = kind_1_ordinals,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',kind_1_ordinals) ).

cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

cnf(inverse,axiom,
    domain_of(flip(cross_product(X1,universal_class))) = inverse(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',inverse) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    member(null_class,limit_ordinals),
    prove_null_class_is_not_a_limit_ordinal_1 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection1]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    range_of(restrict(X1,X2,universal_class)) = image(X1,X2),
    image ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    domain_of(inverse(X1)) = range_of(X1),
    range_of ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,X3)) = restrict(X1,X2,X3),
    restriction1 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) = limit_ordinals,
    limit_ordinals ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair3]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(null_class,X1)
    | member(null_class,complement(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
    union(singleton(null_class),image(successor_relation,ordinal_numbers)) = kind_1_ordinals,
    kind_1_ordinals ).

cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    singleton_set ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    domain_of(inverse(intersection(X1,cross_product(X2,universal_class)))) = image(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
    domain_of(flip(cross_product(X1,universal_class))) = inverse(X1),
    inverse ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    union ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,limit_ordinals)
    | member(X1,complement(kind_1_ordinals)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(null_class,complement(complement(X1)))
    | member(null_class,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(null_class,null_class)),complement(domain_of(domain_of(flip(cross_product(intersection(successor_relation,cross_product(ordinal_numbers,universal_class)),universal_class))))))) = kind_1_ordinals,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    member(null_class,complement(kind_1_ordinals)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    member(null_class,unordered_pair(X1,null_class)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    member(null_class,intersection(complement(unordered_pair(null_class,null_class)),complement(domain_of(domain_of(flip(cross_product(intersection(successor_relation,cross_product(ordinal_numbers,universal_class)),universal_class))))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,complement(unordered_pair(X1,null_class))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_44]),c_0_45]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : NUM181-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.44  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:10:34 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.65  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2326714 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.26/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.65  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % new_bool_1 with pid 2326723 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.26/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.65  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.65  % Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.65  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.26/0.65  
% 0.26/0.65  % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.65  % Parsed axioms                        : 159
% 0.26/0.65  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Initial clauses                      : 159
% 0.26/0.65  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
% 0.26/0.65  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 140
% 0.26/0.65  % Processed clauses                    : 397
% 0.26/0.65  % ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.26/0.65  % ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.26/0.65  % ...remaining for further processing  : 388
% 0.26/0.65  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.26/0.65  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Generated clauses                    : 839
% 0.26/0.65  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 683
% 0.26/0.65  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Paramodulations                      : 833
% 0.26/0.65  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.26/0.65  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Total rewrite steps                  : 152
% 0.26/0.65  % ...of those cached                   : 107
% 0.26/0.65  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.26/0.65  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.26/0.65  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.65  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.26/0.65  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.65  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.26/0.65  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.26/0.65  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.26/0.65  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.26/0.65  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.26/0.65  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.26/0.65  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.26/0.65  % Current number of processed clauses  : 243
% 0.26/0.65  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 68
% 0.26/0.65  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.26/0.65  %    Negative unit clauses             : 39
% 0.26/0.65  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 134
% 0.26/0.65  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 561
% 0.26/0.65  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1075
% 0.26/0.65  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Current number of archived clauses   : 158
% 0.26/0.65  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3537
% 0.26/0.65  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2356
% 0.26/0.65  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.26/0.65  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 149
% 0.26/0.65  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 39
% 0.26/0.65  % BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 0.26/0.65  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/0.65  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 22890
% 0.26/0.65  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 285
% 0.26/0.65  
% 0.26/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.65  % User time                : 0.071 s
% 0.26/0.65  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.65  % Total time               : 0.080 s
% 0.26/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 4028 pages
% 0.26/0.65  
% 0.26/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.65  % User time                : 0.283 s
% 0.26/0.65  % System time              : 0.032 s
% 0.26/0.65  % Total time               : 0.315 s
% 0.26/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.65  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------