↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUM228-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:07:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.39s 0.56s
% Output   : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   1 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   2 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(regularity1,axiom,
    ( X = null_class
    | member(regular(X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).

cnf(recursion_equation_functions1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,recursion_equation_functions(Y))
    | function(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',recursion_equation_functions1) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ function(z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_1) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_2,negated_conjecture,
    recursion_equation_functions(z) != null_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2) ).

cnf(202,plain,
    ~ member(X,recursion_equation_functions(z)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[recursion_equation_functions1,prove_corollary_1]) ).

cnf(213,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[regularity1,prove_corollary_2]),202]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : NUM228-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 07:38:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-07T07:38:44
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n024.cluster.edu at 2022-07-07T07:38:44
% 0.39/0.56  
% 0.39/0.56  
% 0.39/0.56  #||
% 0.39/0.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.56  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.56  ||#
% 0.39/0.56  
% 0.39/0.56  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.39/0.56  ;       247 formulas have been input or derived (from 41 formulas).
% 0.39/0.56  ;       213 (86%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.39/0.56  ;           35 (16%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.39/0.56  ;          178 (84%) are still being kept.
% 0.39/0.56  ; 
% 0.39/0.56  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.031  34%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.005   5%   Assert                       (160 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.018  20%   Process new row              (200 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.001   1%   Resolution                   (80 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.003   3%   Paramodulation               (40 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (1 call)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.003   3%   Condensing                   (113 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.001   1%   Forward subsumption          (113 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.002   2%   Backward subsumption         (112 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (36 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.007   8%   Forward simplification       (200 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (179 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (58 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.020  22%   Other
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.091        Total
% 0.39/0.56  ;     0.093        Real time
% 0.39/0.56  ; 
% 0.39/0.56  ; Term-hash-array has 446 terms in all.
% 0.39/0.56  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 112 entries (112 at peak, 112 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 561 nodes (561 at peak, 561 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ;  Retrieved 40 possibly forward subsuming rows in 113 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ;  Retrieved 6 possibly backward subsumed rows in 112 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ; Path-index has 464 entries (464 at peak, 465 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Path-index has 1,621 nodes (1,621 at peak, 1,622 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Trie-index has 464 entries (464 at peak, 465 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Trie-index has 1,351 nodes (1,351 at peak, 1,352 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.39/0.56  ; Retrieved 93 generalization terms in 469 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ; Retrieved 106 instance terms in 69 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ; Retrieved 951 unifiable terms in 191 calls.
% 0.39/0.56  ; 
% 0.39/0.56  ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 0.39/0.56  ;     1 with value 11              2 with value 13               1 with value 14
% 0.39/0.56  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 119 entries:
% 0.39/0.56  ;     6 with value 10              7 with value 18               2 with value 27
% 0.39/0.56  ;    11 with value 11              3 with value 19               2 with value 30
% 0.39/0.56  ;     9 with value 12              6 with value 20               2 with value 31
% 0.39/0.56  ;    15 with value 13              4 with value 21               1 with value 33
% 0.39/0.56  ;     8 with value 14              5 with value 22               1 with value 34
% 0.39/0.56  ;    15 with value 15              2 with value 24               2 with value 35
% 0.39/0.56  ;     4 with value 16              3 with value 25               1 with value 50
% 0.39/0.56  ;     8 with value 17              2 with value 26
% 0.39/0.56  ; The agenda of rows to give has 18 entries:
% 0.39/0.56  ;     2 with value (4 4)           6 with value (4 7)            1 with value (4 9)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     2 with value (4 5)           2 with value (4 8)            3 with value (4 10)
% 0.39/0.56  ;     2 with value (4 6)
% 0.39/0.56  Evaluation took:
% 0.39/0.56    0.094 seconds of real time
% 0.39/0.56    0.081634 seconds of user run time
% 0.39/0.56    0.011867 seconds of system run time
% 0.39/0.56    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.39/0.56    0 page faults and
% 0.39/0.56    4,532,256 bytes consed.
% 0.39/0.56  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.56  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-07T07:38:44
% 0.39/0.56  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.56  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------