%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : NUM286-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:51:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.24s 0.55s
% Output : Saturation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_6ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_8ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ equalish(successor(X1),successor(X2))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
c_0_6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ equalish(X1,X2)
| equalish(successor(X1),successor(X2)) ),
c_0_7,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
equalish(multiply(X1,successor(X2)),add(multiply(X1,X2),X1)),
times,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
equalish(add(X1,successor(X2)),successor(add(X1,X2))),
addition,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
equalish(add(X1,n0),X1),
adding_zero,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
equalish(multiply(X1,n0),n0),
times_zero,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : NUM286-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.45 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:25:44 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.55 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 1987340 completed with status 1
% 0.24/0.55 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.24/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.55 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.55 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1987347 completed with status 1
% 0.24/0.55 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.55 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.55 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.55 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.55 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 % No proof found!
% 0.24/0.55 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.24/0.55 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.55 % Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.24/0.55 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.24/0.55 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.24/0.55 % Processed clauses : 6
% 0.24/0.55 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.24/0.55 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.24/0.55 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Paramodulations : 1
% 0.24/0.55 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/0.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.24/0.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.24/0.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.24/0.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/0.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 152
% 0.24/0.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/0.55 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 3328 pages
% 0.24/0.55
% 0.24/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.55 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.24/0.55 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.24/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------