↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM294+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:23:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.08s 1.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  27   ~;  19   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn  47   !;   2   ?;  17   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f13,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n12,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n1)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn12) ).

fof(f21,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n20,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n0),rdnn(n2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn20) ).

fof(f267,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less12) ).

fof(f276,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( rdn_positive_less(X1,X3)
     => rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(X0),X1),rdn(rdnn(X2),X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less_multi_digit_high) ).

fof(f281,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( rdn_positive_less(X2,X3)
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
        & rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2)) )
     => less(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_entry_point_pos_pos) ).

fof(f402,conjecture,
    ? [X0] : less(n12,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n12_less_something) ).

fof(f403,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] : less(n12,X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f402]) ).

fof(f407,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X1,X3)
      | rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(X0),X1),rdn(rdnn(X2),X3)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f276]) ).

fof(f413,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X3)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2))
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f281]) ).

fof(f414,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X3)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2))
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f413]) ).

fof(f450,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ less(n12,X0),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f403]) ).

fof(f466,plain,
    rdn_translate(n12,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n1)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f474,plain,
    rdn_translate(n20,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n0),rdnn(n2)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f720,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f267]) ).

fof(f729,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X1,X3)
      | rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(X0),X1),rdn(rdnn(X2),X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f407]) ).

fof(f734,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X3)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2))
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f414]) ).

fof(f858,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ less(n12,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f450]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    rdn_translate(n12,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n1)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f466]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    rdn_translate(n20,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n0),rdnn(n2)))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f474]) ).

tcf(c_315,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n2)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f720]) ).

tcf(c_324,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(X2),X0),rdn(rdnn(X3),X1))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f729]) ).

tcf(c_329,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( less(X0,X2)
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X1,X3)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f734]) ).

tcf(c_453,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ less(n12,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f858]) ).

tcf(c_2990,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ less(n12,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_453]) ).

tcf(c_5100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( less(n12,X1)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X0))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n1)),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_329]) ).

tcf(c_5131,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X0))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n1)),X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5100,c_2990]) ).

tcf(c_15450,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n1),X2)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(X1),X2))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_324,c_5131]) ).

tcf(c_16124,plain,
    ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_15450]) ).

tcf(c_16232,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16124,c_315]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : NUM294+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.05/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.05/0.31  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:31:22 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.31  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.07/0.33  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34  
% 0.07/0.34  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.07/0.34  
% 0.07/0.34  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.07/0.34  % Proving...
% 8.08/1.52  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.08/1.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % ------  iProver source info
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 8.08/1.52  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 8.08/1.52  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Parsing...
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Proving...
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % 
% 8.08/1.52  % clauses                               402
% 8.08/1.52  % conjectures                           1
% 8.08/1.52  % EPR                                   8
% 8.08/1.52  % Horn                                  400
% 8.08/1.52  % unary                                 376
% 8.08/1.52  % binary                                6
% 8.08/1.52  % lits                                  472
% 8.08/1.52  % lits eq                               5
% 8.08/1.52  % fd_pure                               0
% 8.08/1.52  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 8.08/1.52  % fd_cond                               0
% 8.08/1.52  % fd_pseudo_cond                        5
% 8.08/1.52  % AC symbols                            0
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ 
% 8.08/1.52  % Current options:
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ 
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % 
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % ------ Proving...
% 8.08/1.52  % 
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.08/1.52  
% 8.08/1.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------