%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : NUM295+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:35:31 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.91s 1.09s
% Output : Refutation 0.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : NUM295+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed May 8 16:50:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.91/1.09 % Version: 1.5
% 0.91/1.09 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.91/1.09 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.91/1.09 fof(something_less_something,conjecture,(?[X]:(?[Y]:less(X,Y))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', something_less_something)).
% 0.91/1.09 fof(c14,negated_conjecture,(~(?[X]:(?[Y]:less(X,Y)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[something_less_something])).
% 0.91/1.09 fof(c15,negated_conjecture,(![X]:(![Y]:~less(X,Y))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c14])).
% 0.91/1.09 fof(c16,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:(![X3]:~less(X2,X3))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c15])).
% 0.91/1.09 cnf(c17,negated_conjecture,~less(X133,X134),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c16])).
% 0.91/1.09 fof(rdnn2,axiom,rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax', rdnn2)).
% 0.91/1.09 cnf(c387,plain,rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn2])).
% 0.91/1.09 fof(rdn9,axiom,rdn_translate(n9,rdn_pos(rdnn(n9))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax', rdn9)).
% 0.91/1.09 cnf(c507,plain,rdn_translate(n9,rdn_pos(rdnn(n9))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn9])).
% 0.91/1.09 fof(less_entry_point_neg_pos,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(![RDN_X]:(![RDN_Y]:((rdn_translate(X,rdn_neg(RDN_X))&rdn_translate(Y,rdn_pos(RDN_Y)))=>less(X,Y)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax', less_entry_point_neg_pos)).
% 0.91/1.09 fof(c215,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(![RDN_X]:(![RDN_Y]:((~rdn_translate(X,rdn_neg(RDN_X))|~rdn_translate(Y,rdn_pos(RDN_Y)))|less(X,Y)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_neg_pos])).
% 0.91/1.09 fof(c216,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(((![RDN_X]:~rdn_translate(X,rdn_neg(RDN_X)))|(![RDN_Y]:~rdn_translate(Y,rdn_pos(RDN_Y))))|less(X,Y)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c215])).
% 0.91/1.09 fof(c218,plain,(![X108]:(![X109]:(![X110]:(![X111]:((~rdn_translate(X108,rdn_neg(X110))|~rdn_translate(X109,rdn_pos(X111)))|less(X108,X109)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c217,plain,(![X108]:(![X109]:(((![X110]:~rdn_translate(X108,rdn_neg(X110)))|(![X111]:~rdn_translate(X109,rdn_pos(X111))))|less(X108,X109)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c216])).])).
% 0.91/1.09 cnf(c219,plain,~rdn_translate(X328,rdn_neg(X331))|~rdn_translate(X329,rdn_pos(X330))|less(X328,X329),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c218])).
% 0.91/1.09 cnf(c644,plain,~rdn_translate(X333,rdn_neg(X332))|less(X333,n9),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c219, c507])).
% 0.91/1.09 cnf(c654,plain,less(nn2,n9),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c644, c387])).
% 0.91/1.09 cnf(c664,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c654, c17])).
% 0.91/1.09 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.91/1.09
% 0.91/1.09 % Initial clauses : 424
% 0.91/1.09 % Processed clauses : 105
% 0.91/1.09 % Factors computed : 3
% 0.91/1.09 % Resolvents computed: 145
% 0.91/1.09 % Tautologies deleted: 4
% 0.91/1.09 % Forward subsumed : 48
% 0.91/1.09 % Backward subsumed : 48
% 0.91/1.09 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.91/1.09 % User time : 0.724 s
% 0.91/1.09 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.91/1.09 % Total time : 0.736 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------