↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM295+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:23:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.97s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   70 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (  32   ~;  24   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   0 sgn  55   !;   4   ?;  25   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f137,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn9,rdn_neg(rdnn(n9))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn9) ).

fof(f282,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
        & rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X2)) )
     => less(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_entry_point_neg_pos) ).

fof(f284,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( less(X0,X1)
    <=> ( X1 != X0
        & ~ less(X1,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_property) ).

fof(f402,conjecture,
    ? [X0,X1] : less(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',something_less_something) ).

fof(f403,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0,X1] : less(X0,X1),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f402]) ).

fof(f415,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X2))
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f282]) ).

fof(f416,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X2))
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f415]) ).

fof(f450,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ less(X0,X1),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f403]) ).

fof(f451,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ less(X0,X1)
        | ( X1 != X0
          & ~ less(X1,X0) ) )
      & ( X0 = X1
        | less(X1,X0)
        | less(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f284]) ).

fof(f452,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ less(X0,X1)
        | ( X1 != X0
          & ~ less(X1,X0) ) )
      & ( X0 = X1
        | less(X1,X0)
        | less(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f451]) ).

fof(f590,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn9,rdn_neg(rdnn(n9))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f735,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X2))
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f416]) ).

fof(f738,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ less(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f452]) ).

fof(f739,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | less(X1,X0)
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f452]) ).

fof(f858,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ~ less(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f450]) ).

tcf(c_185,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn9,rdn_neg(rdnn(n9))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f590]) ).

tcf(c_330,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( less(X0,X2)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f735]) ).

tcf(c_332,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( less(X1,X0)
      | less(X0,X1)
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f739]) ).

tcf(c_333,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ less(X1,X0)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f738]) ).

tcf(c_453,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ less(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f858]) ).

tcf(c_476,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ~ less(X0,X1),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_333,c_453]) ).

tcf(c_478,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( less(X1,X0)
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_332,c_453,c_332]) ).

tcf(c_503,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X1)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_330,c_476]) ).

tcf(c_506,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : X0 = X1,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_478,c_476]) ).

tcf(c_1363,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : X0 = iProver_smallest,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_506]) ).

tcf(c_1373,plain,
    rdn_translate(iProver_smallest,iProver_smallest),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_185,c_1363]) ).

tcf(c_1690,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,iProver_smallest)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,iProver_smallest) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_503,c_1363]) ).

tcf(c_1794,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ iPr_def_10
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,iProver_smallest) ),
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[c_1690]) ).

tcf(c_1795,plain,
    iPr_def_10,
    inference(splitting,[splitting(split),new_symbols(definition,[])],[c_1690]) ).

tcf(c_1809,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ rdn_translate(X0,iProver_smallest),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_1794,c_1794,c_1795]) ).

tcf(c_1814,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1373,c_1809]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM295+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:33:48 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 2.97/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.97/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.97/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.97/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.97/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 381  sf_s  rm: 23 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 6 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 2 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.97/1.28  
% 2.97/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------