↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM298+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:51:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  19   ~;  10   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   3 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(less_property,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less(X1,X2)
    <=> ( X2 != X1
        & ~ less(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_property) ).

fof(n2_not_less_nn2,conjecture,
    ~ less(n2,nn2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n2_not_less_nn2) ).

fof(less_entry_point_neg_pos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X10,X11] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X10)) )
     => less(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_entry_point_neg_pos) ).

fof(rdn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn2) ).

fof(rdnn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn2) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less(X1,X2)
    <=> ( X2 != X1
        & ~ less(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_property]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ less(n2,nn2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[n2_not_less_nn2]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X37,X38,X39,X40] :
      ( less(X37,X38)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X38,rdn_pos(X40))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X37,rdn_neg(X39)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_neg_pos])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X45,X46] :
      ( ( less(X45,X46)
        | X46 = X45
        | less(X46,X45) )
      & ( ~ less(X45,X46)
        | X46 != X45 )
      & ( ~ less(X45,X46)
        | ~ less(X46,X45) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    less(n2,nn2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2))
    | less(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ less(X2,X1)
    | ~ less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    less(n2,nn2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2))
    | less(X1,n2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less(nn2,n2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM298+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:21:25 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.42  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % sh5l with pid 761206 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.42  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.42  % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % SubtermCWHack with pid 761207 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.42  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.42  % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.42  
% 0.14/0.42  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.42  % Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 0.14/0.42  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 246
% 0.14/0.42  % Initial clauses                      : 160
% 0.14/0.42  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 160
% 0.14/0.42  % Processed clauses                    : 68
% 0.14/0.42  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % ...remaining for further processing  : 68
% 0.14/0.42  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.14/0.42  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Generated clauses                    : 46
% 0.14/0.42  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 38
% 0.14/0.42  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Paramodulations                      : 42
% 0.14/0.42  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.14/0.42  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.14/0.42  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2
% 0.14/0.42  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.14/0.42  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  % Current number of processed clauses  : 66
% 0.14/0.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 39
% 0.14/0.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.14/0.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 18
% 0.14/0.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 130
% 0.14/0.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 209
% 0.14/0.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 93
% 0.14/0.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 86
% 0.14/0.42  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 118
% 0.14/0.42  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 11845
% 0.14/0.42  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1843
% 0.14/0.42  
% 0.14/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.42  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.42  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 4764 pages
% 0.14/0.42  
% 0.14/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.42  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.42  % Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.14/0.42  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------