↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : NUM299+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:53:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.57s 3.23s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (  26   ~;  18   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(less_property,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less(X2,X1)
        & X2 != X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_property) ).

fof(less_entry_point_neg_neg,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X10,X11] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X10))
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(X11))
        & rdn_positive_less(X11,X10) )
     => less(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_entry_point_neg_neg) ).

fof(nn2_not_less_nn4,conjecture,
    ~ less(nn2,nn4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nn2_not_less_nn4) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less_transitivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
        & rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3)) )
     => rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less_transitivity) ).

fof(rdnn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn2) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less34,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less34) ).

fof(rdnn4,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn4,rdn_neg(rdnn(n4))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn4) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less23,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less23) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less(X2,X1)
        & X2 != X1 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_property]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X178,X179,X180,X181] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X178,rdn_neg(X180))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X179,rdn_neg(X181))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X181,X180)
      | less(X178,X179) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_neg_neg])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X182,X183] :
      ( ( ~ less(X183,X182)
        | ~ less(X182,X183) )
      & ( X183 != X182
        | ~ less(X182,X183) )
      & ( less(X183,X182)
        | X183 = X182
        | less(X182,X183) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    less(nn2,nn4),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nn2_not_less_nn4])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X154,X155,X156] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X154),rdnn(X155))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X155),rdnn(X156))
      | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X154),rdnn(X156)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less_transitivity])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( less(X1,X3)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_neg(X4))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ less(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    less(nn2,nn4),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X3))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less34]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( less(X1,nn2)
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),X2)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn4,rdn_neg(rdnn(n4))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn4]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less(nn4,nn2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n4))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less23]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : NUM299+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 00:25:56 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 4.57/3.23  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 4.57/3.23  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 4.57/3.23  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.57/3.23  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.57/3.24  % Total time : 2.373s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------