↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM299+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:23:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.39s 1.09s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   84 (  41   ~;  32   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn  48   !;   0   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f130,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn2) ).

fof(f132,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn4,rdn_neg(rdnn(n4))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn4) ).

fof(f268,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less23) ).

fof(f269,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less34) ).

fof(f275,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
        & rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X1)) )
     => rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less_transitivity) ).

fof(f283,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( rdn_positive_less(X3,X2)
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X3))
        & rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X2)) )
     => less(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_entry_point_neg_neg) ).

fof(f284,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( less(X0,X1)
    <=> ( X1 != X0
        & ~ less(X1,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_property) ).

fof(f402,conjecture,
    ~ less(nn2,nn4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nn2_not_less_nn4) ).

fof(f403,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ less(nn2,nn4),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f402]) ).

fof(f404,plain,
    less(nn2,nn4),
    inference(flattening,[],[f403]) ).

fof(f406,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X3,X2)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X2))
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f283]) ).

fof(f407,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X3,X2)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X2))
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f406]) ).

fof(f419,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X1))
      | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X2)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f275]) ).

fof(f420,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X1))
      | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X2)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f419]) ).

fof(f446,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ less(X0,X1)
        | ( X1 != X0
          & ~ less(X1,X0) ) )
      & ( X0 = X1
        | less(X1,X0)
        | less(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f284]) ).

fof(f447,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ less(X0,X1)
        | ( X1 != X0
          & ~ less(X1,X0) ) )
      & ( X0 = X1
        | less(X1,X0)
        | less(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f446]) ).

fof(f448,plain,
    less(nn2,nn4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f404]) ).

fof(f450,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ less(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f447]) ).

fof(f452,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X3,X2)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X2))
      | less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f407]) ).

fof(f455,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f130]) ).

fof(f456,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn4,rdn_neg(rdnn(n4))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).

fof(f461,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X1))
      | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f420]) ).

fof(f467,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f269]) ).

fof(f468,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f268]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    less(nn2,nn4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f448]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ less(X1,X0)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f450]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( less(X0,X2)
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X3,X1)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(X3))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f452]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f455]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn4,rdn_neg(rdnn(n4))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f456]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X2))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X0),rdnn(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f461]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f467]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f468]) ).

tcf(c_2317,plain,
    ~ less(nn4,nn2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_2331,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( less(nn4,X0)
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X1,rdnn(n4))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_neg(X1)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_53]) ).

tcf(c_2515,plain,
    ( less(nn4,nn2)
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n4)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_2331]) ).

tcf(c_2518,plain,
    ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2515,c_2317]) ).

tcf(c_2710,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(X0))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_62]) ).

tcf(c_4491,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_2710]) ).

tcf(c_4493,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4491,c_2518]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM299+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:34:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 4.39/1.09  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.39/1.09  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.39/1.09  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.39/1.09  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 7 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Proving...
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % 
% 4.39/1.09  % clauses                               142
% 4.39/1.09  % conjectures                           1
% 4.39/1.09  % EPR                                   7
% 4.39/1.09  % Horn                                  141
% 4.39/1.09  % unary                                 123
% 4.39/1.09  % binary                                3
% 4.39/1.09  % lits                                  191
% 4.39/1.09  % lits eq                               4
% 4.39/1.09  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.39/1.09  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.39/1.09  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.39/1.09  % fd_pseudo_cond                        4
% 4.39/1.09  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ 
% 4.39/1.09  % Current options:
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ 
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % 
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % ------ Proving...
% 4.39/1.09  % 
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.39/1.09  
% 4.39/1.09  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------