%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : NUM302+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:35:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.67s 1.89s
% Output : Refutation 1.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : NUM302+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed May 8 16:14:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 1.67/1.89 % Version: 1.5
% 1.67/1.89 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.67/1.89 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 1.67/1.89 fof(nn2_less_something,conjecture,(?[X]:less(nn2,X)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', nn2_less_something)).
% 1.67/1.89 fof(c14,negated_conjecture,(~(?[X]:less(nn2,X))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nn2_less_something])).
% 1.67/1.89 fof(c15,negated_conjecture,(![X]:~less(nn2,X)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c14])).
% 1.67/1.89 fof(c16,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:~less(nn2,X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c15])).
% 1.67/1.89 cnf(c17,negated_conjecture,~less(nn2,X132),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c16])).
% 1.67/1.89 fof(rdnn2,axiom,rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax', rdnn2)).
% 1.67/1.89 cnf(c387,plain,rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn2])).
% 1.67/1.89 fof(rdn8,axiom,rdn_translate(n8,rdn_pos(rdnn(n8))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax', rdn8)).
% 1.67/1.89 cnf(c508,plain,rdn_translate(n8,rdn_pos(rdnn(n8))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn8])).
% 1.67/1.89 fof(less_entry_point_neg_pos,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(![RDN_X]:(![RDN_Y]:((rdn_translate(X,rdn_neg(RDN_X))&rdn_translate(Y,rdn_pos(RDN_Y)))=>less(X,Y)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax', less_entry_point_neg_pos)).
% 1.67/1.89 fof(c215,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(![RDN_X]:(![RDN_Y]:((~rdn_translate(X,rdn_neg(RDN_X))|~rdn_translate(Y,rdn_pos(RDN_Y)))|less(X,Y)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_neg_pos])).
% 1.67/1.89 fof(c216,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(((![RDN_X]:~rdn_translate(X,rdn_neg(RDN_X)))|(![RDN_Y]:~rdn_translate(Y,rdn_pos(RDN_Y))))|less(X,Y)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c215])).
% 1.67/1.89 fof(c218,plain,(![X107]:(![X108]:(![X109]:(![X110]:((~rdn_translate(X107,rdn_neg(X109))|~rdn_translate(X108,rdn_pos(X110)))|less(X107,X108)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c217,plain,(![X107]:(![X108]:(((![X109]:~rdn_translate(X107,rdn_neg(X109)))|(![X110]:~rdn_translate(X108,rdn_pos(X110))))|less(X107,X108)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c216])).])).
% 1.67/1.89 cnf(c219,plain,~rdn_translate(X886,rdn_neg(X887))|~rdn_translate(X888,rdn_pos(X885))|less(X886,X888),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c218])).
% 1.67/1.89 cnf(c3178,plain,~rdn_translate(X890,rdn_neg(X889))|less(X890,n8),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c219, c508])).
% 1.67/1.89 cnf(c3188,plain,less(nn2,n8),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c3178, c387])).
% 1.67/1.89 cnf(c3203,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c3188, c17])).
% 1.67/1.89 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 1.67/1.89
% 1.67/1.89 % Initial clauses : 424
% 1.67/1.89 % Processed clauses : 330
% 1.67/1.89 % Factors computed : 25
% 1.67/1.89 % Resolvents computed: 2666
% 1.67/1.89 % Tautologies deleted: 10
% 1.67/1.89 % Forward subsumed : 424
% 1.67/1.89 % Backward subsumed : 6
% 1.67/1.89 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 1.67/1.89 % User time : 1.468 s
% 1.67/1.89 % System time : 0.022 s
% 1.67/1.89 % Total time : 1.490 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------