↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : NUM303+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:53:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 35.22s 19.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 35.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  22   ~;  15   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   4 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(n31_not_n12,conjecture,
    n31 != n21,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',n31_not_n12) ).

fof(less_property,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less(X2,X1)
        & X2 != X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_property) ).

fof(less_entry_point_pos_pos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X10,X11] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10))
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
        & rdn_positive_less(X10,X11) )
     => less(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_entry_point_pos_pos) ).

fof(rdn31,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n31,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn31) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less_multi_digit_high,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
      ( rdn_positive_less(X5,X7)
     => rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(X4),X5),rdn(rdnn(X6),X7)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less_multi_digit_high) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less23,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less23) ).

fof(rdn21,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n21,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn21) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    n31 = n21,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[n31_not_n12])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less(X1,X2)
    <=> ( ~ less(X2,X1)
        & X2 != X1 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_property]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X170,X171,X172,X173] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X170,rdn_pos(X172))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X171,rdn_pos(X173))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X172,X173)
      | less(X170,X171) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_pos_pos])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    rdn_translate(n31,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n3)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn31]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    n31 = n21,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X182,X183] :
      ( ( ~ less(X183,X182)
        | ~ less(X182,X183) )
      & ( X183 != X182
        | ~ less(X182,X183) )
      & ( less(X183,X182)
        | X183 = X182
        | less(X182,X183) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X157,X158,X159,X160] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X158,X160)
      | rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(X157),X158),rdn(rdnn(X159),X160)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less_multi_digit_high])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( less(X1,X3)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rdn_translate(n21,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n3)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ less(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(X3),X1),rdn(rdnn(X4),X2))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less23]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( less(X1,n21)
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,rdn(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    rdn_translate(n21,rdn_pos(rdn(rdnn(n1),rdnn(n2)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn21]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ less(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdn(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n2)),rdn(rdnn(X2),rdnn(n3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : NUM303+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 00:26:38 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 35.22/19.28  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 35.22/19.28  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 35.22/19.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 35.22/19.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 35.32/19.31  % Total time : 17.418s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------