↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM310+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.15s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  108 (  50   ~;  41   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (   0 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(add_digit_digit_digit,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X25),rdnn(X21),rdnn(X24),rdnn(n0))
        & rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X25),rdnn(n0)) )
     => rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X21),rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X24)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',add_digit_digit_digit) ).

fof(sum_entry_point_pos_pos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X12))
        & rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X10,X11,X12)
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10)) )
     => sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',sum_entry_point_pos_pos) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n6_n0_n6_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n6),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n6),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n6_n0_n6_n0) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n3_n3_n6_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n6),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n3_n3_n6_n0) ).

fof(sum_n2_n3_not_n6,conjecture,
    ~ sum(n2,n3,n6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_n2_n3_not_n6) ).

fof(rdn6,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n6,rdn_pos(rdnn(n6))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn6) ).

fof(less_entry_point_pos_pos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X10,X11] :
      ( ( rdn_positive_less(X10,X11)
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10)) )
     => less(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_entry_point_pos_pos) ).

fof(unique_LHS,axiom,
    ! [X17,X18,X2,X3] :
      ( ( sum(X18,X2,X3)
        & sum(X17,X2,X3) )
     => X17 = X18 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',unique_LHS) ).

fof(rdn3,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn3) ).

fof(less_property,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less(X1,X2)
    <=> ( X2 != X1
        & ~ less(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_property) ).

fof(rdn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn2) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less23,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less23) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X77,X78,X79,X80,X81] :
      ( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X77),rdnn(X78),rdnn(X79),rdnn(X80))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X81),rdnn(X77),rdnn(X80),rdnn(n0))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X78),rdnn(X79),rdnn(X81),rdnn(n0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[add_digit_digit_digit])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X33,X34,X35,X36,X37,X38] :
      ( sum(X33,X34,X35)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X35,rdn_pos(X38))
      | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X36,X37,X38)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X34,rdn_pos(X37))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X33,rdn_pos(X36)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_pos_pos])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X3),rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n0))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X5)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n6),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n6),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n6_n0_n6_n0]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X6,rdn_pos(X5))
    | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | sum(X1,X3,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n6),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n6)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(X4)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(X5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n6)))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n6),rdnn(n0))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n6),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n3_n3_n6_n0]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ sum(n2,n3,n6),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[sum_n2_n3_not_n6]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n6)))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    rdn_translate(n6,rdn_pos(rdnn(n6))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn6]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X129,X130,X131,X132] :
      ( less(X129,X130)
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X131,X132)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X130,rdn_pos(X132))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X129,rdn_pos(X131)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_pos_pos])])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X69,X70,X71,X72] :
      ( X69 = X70
      | ~ sum(X70,X71,X72)
      | ~ sum(X69,X71,X72) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unique_LHS])])]) ).

fof(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n2,n3,n6),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | sum(X1,X2,n6) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn3]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( less(X1,X2)
    <=> ( X2 != X1
        & ~ less(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_property]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X4)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | less(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X4,X2,X3)
    | ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | X1 = X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n2,n3,n6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | sum(X1,n3,n6) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X144,X145] :
      ( ( less(X144,X145)
        | X145 = X144
        | less(X145,X144) )
      & ( ~ less(X144,X145)
        | X145 != X144 )
      & ( ~ less(X144,X145)
        | ~ less(X145,X144) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,rdnn(n3))
    | less(X1,n3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less23]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(X1,n3,n6)
    | X1 = n2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    sum(n3,n3,n6),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ less(X2,X1)
    | X1 != X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    less(n2,n3),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    n3 = n2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ~ less(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM310+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:21:05 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.15/0.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.15/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.15/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % sh5l with pid 3938039 completed with status 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Result found by sh5l
% 1.15/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.15/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 1.15/0.63  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.15/0.63  % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.15/0.63  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.15/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3938044 completed with status 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.15/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.15/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 1.15/0.63  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 1.15/0.63  % Search class: FGHSF-FFLM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.15/0.63  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.15/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.15/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.15/0.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 1.15/0.63  
% 1.15/0.63  % Proof found!
% 1.15/0.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.15/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.15/0.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 1.15/0.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 247
% 1.15/0.63  % Initial clauses                      : 159
% 1.15/0.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 159
% 1.15/0.63  % Processed clauses                    : 1689
% 1.15/0.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % ...subsumed                          : 661
% 1.15/0.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1028
% 1.15/0.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 1.15/0.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 21
% 1.15/0.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 61
% 1.15/0.63  % Generated clauses                    : 3249
% 1.15/0.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3098
% 1.15/0.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Paramodulations                      : 3245
% 1.15/0.63  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 1.15/0.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 1.15/0.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 158
% 1.15/0.63  % ...of those cached                   : 135
% 1.15/0.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.15/0.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.15/0.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.15/0.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.15/0.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.15/0.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.15/0.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.15/0.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.15/0.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.15/0.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.15/0.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.15/0.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.15/0.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 944
% 1.15/0.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 163
% 1.15/0.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.15/0.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 64
% 1.15/0.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 717
% 1.15/0.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1531
% 1.15/0.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 8216
% 1.15/0.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 82
% 1.15/0.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 147059
% 1.15/0.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69617
% 1.15/0.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 443
% 1.15/0.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4929
% 1.15/0.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 1.15/0.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 1.15/0.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.15/0.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 93637
% 1.15/0.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1847
% 1.15/0.63  
% 1.15/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.15/0.63  % User time                : 0.172 s
% 1.15/0.63  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 1.15/0.63  % Total time               : 0.185 s
% 1.15/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4508 pages
% 1.15/0.63  
% 1.15/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.15/0.63  % User time                : 0.182 s
% 1.15/0.63  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 1.15/0.63  % Total time               : 0.197 s
% 1.15/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 1.15/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------