↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM313+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (  31   ~;  28   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0 sgn  32   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(add_digit_digit_digit,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X25),rdnn(X21),rdnn(X24),rdnn(n0))
        & rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X25),rdnn(n0)) )
     => rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X21),rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X24)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',add_digit_digit_digit) ).

fof(sum_entry_point_pos_pos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X12))
        & rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X10,X11,X12)
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10)) )
     => sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',sum_entry_point_pos_pos) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0) ).

fof(sumn2_only_n3_n5,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( sum(n2,X1,n5)
     => X1 = n3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sumn2_only_n3_n5) ).

fof(rdn5,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn5) ).

fof(unique_RHS,axiom,
    ! [X1,X19,X20,X3] :
      ( ( sum(X1,X20,X3)
        & sum(X1,X19,X3) )
     => X19 = X20 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',unique_RHS) ).

fof(rdn3,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn3) ).

fof(rdn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn2) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X78,X79,X80,X81,X82] :
      ( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X78),rdnn(X79),rdnn(X80),rdnn(X81))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X82),rdnn(X78),rdnn(X81),rdnn(n0))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X79),rdnn(X80),rdnn(X82),rdnn(n0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[add_digit_digit_digit])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X34,X35,X36,X37,X38,X39] :
      ( sum(X34,X35,X36)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X36,rdn_pos(X39))
      | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X37,X38,X39)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X35,rdn_pos(X38))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X34,rdn_pos(X37)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_pos_pos])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X3),rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n0))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X5)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X6,rdn_pos(X5))
    | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | sum(X1,X3,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(X4)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(X5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( sum(n2,X1,n5)
       => X1 = n3 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[sumn2_only_n3_n5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn5]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X74,X75,X76,X77] :
      ( X75 = X76
      | ~ sum(X74,X76,X77)
      | ~ sum(X74,X75,X77) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unique_RHS])])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0 != n3
    & sum(n2,esk1_0,n5) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | sum(X1,X2,n5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn3]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | X2 = X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n2,esk1_0,n5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
    | sum(X1,n3,n5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(n2,X1,n5)
    | X1 = esk1_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    sum(n2,n3,n5),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != n3,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM313+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:19:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.49  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.44/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % new_bool_1 with pid 4154703 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.44/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.44/0.49  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.44/0.49  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.49  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.49  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 4154714 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.44/0.49  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.44/0.49  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.44/0.49  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.49  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.49  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.49  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.44/0.49  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.44/0.49  
% 0.44/0.49  % Proof found!
% 0.44/0.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.49  % Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 0.44/0.49  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 262
% 0.44/0.49  % Initial clauses                      : 141
% 0.44/0.49  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 141
% 0.44/0.49  % Processed clauses                    : 786
% 0.44/0.49  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % ...subsumed                          : 120
% 0.44/0.49  % ...remaining for further processing  : 666
% 0.44/0.49  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Generated clauses                    : 712
% 0.44/0.49  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 711
% 0.44/0.49  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Paramodulations                      : 712
% 0.44/0.49  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.44/0.49  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.44/0.49  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.44/0.49  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.44/0.49  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.44/0.49  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.44/0.49  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.44/0.49  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.44/0.49  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.44/0.49  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.44/0.49  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.44/0.49  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.44/0.49  % Current number of processed clauses  : 525
% 0.44/0.49  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 152
% 0.44/0.49  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.44/0.49  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.44/0.49  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 372
% 0.44/0.49  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 204
% 0.44/0.49  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1034
% 0.44/0.49  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Current number of archived clauses   : 141
% 0.44/0.49  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29886
% 0.44/0.49  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22381
% 0.44/0.49  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 120
% 0.44/0.49  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42
% 0.44/0.49  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.44/0.49  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 29448
% 0.44/0.49  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1780
% 0.44/0.49  
% 0.44/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.49  % User time                : 0.059 s
% 0.44/0.49  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.44/0.49  % Total time               : 0.064 s
% 0.44/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 4712 pages
% 0.44/0.49  
% 0.44/0.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.49  % User time                : 0.125 s
% 0.44/0.49  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.44/0.49  % Total time               : 0.135 s
% 0.44/0.49  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.44/0.49  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------