↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM315+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  27   ~;  23   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(add_digit_digit_digit,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X25),rdnn(X21),rdnn(X24),rdnn(n0))
        & rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X25),rdnn(n0)) )
     => rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X21),rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X24)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',add_digit_digit_digit) ).

fof(sum_entry_point_neg_neg,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X3,rdn_neg(X12))
        & rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X10,X11,X12)
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X10)) )
     => sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',sum_entry_point_neg_neg) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n7_n0_n7_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n7_n0_n7_n0) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n2_n5_n7_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n2_n5_n7_n0) ).

fof(sum_nn2_nn5_nn7,conjecture,
    sum(nn2,nn5,nn7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_nn2_nn5_nn7) ).

fof(rdnn7,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn7,rdn_neg(rdnn(n7))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn7) ).

fof(rdnn5,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn5) ).

fof(rdnn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn2) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X77,X78,X79,X80,X81] :
      ( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X77),rdnn(X78),rdnn(X79),rdnn(X80))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X81),rdnn(X77),rdnn(X80),rdnn(n0))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X78),rdnn(X79),rdnn(X81),rdnn(n0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[add_digit_digit_digit])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X39,X40,X41,X42,X43,X44] :
      ( sum(X39,X40,X41)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X41,rdn_neg(X44))
      | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X42,X43,X44)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X40,rdn_neg(X43))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X39,rdn_neg(X42)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_neg_neg])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X3),rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n0))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X5)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n7_n0_n7_n0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X6,rdn_neg(X5))
    | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_neg(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2))
    | sum(X1,X3,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n7)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(rdnn(X4)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(rdnn(X5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_neg(rdnn(n7)))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n2_n5_n7_n0]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(nn2,nn5,nn7),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[sum_nn2_nn5_nn7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_neg(rdnn(n7)))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn7,rdn_neg(rdnn(n7))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn7]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(nn2,nn5,nn7),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5)))
    | sum(X1,X2,nn7) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn5]) ).

fof(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(nn2,nn5,nn7),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2)))
    | sum(X1,nn5,nn7) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(nn2,nn5,nn7),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM315+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:22:47 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.53  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % new_bool_3 with pid 1784962 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.53  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.53  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.53  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.53  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1784968 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.53  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.53  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.53  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.53  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.53  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.53  
% 0.17/0.53  % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.53  % Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 0.17/0.53  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 259
% 0.17/0.53  % Initial clauses                      : 143
% 0.17/0.53  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 143
% 0.17/0.53  % Processed clauses                    : 1338
% 0.17/0.53  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % ...subsumed                          : 478
% 0.17/0.53  % ...remaining for further processing  : 860
% 0.17/0.53  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Backward-subsumed                    : 39
% 0.17/0.53  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Generated clauses                    : 2096
% 0.17/0.53  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2095
% 0.17/0.53  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Paramodulations                      : 2096
% 0.17/0.53  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.53  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.53  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.53  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.53  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.53  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.53  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.53  % Current number of processed clauses  : 821
% 0.17/0.53  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 158
% 0.17/0.53  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.53  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.17/0.53  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 662
% 0.17/0.53  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 900
% 0.17/0.53  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4662
% 0.17/0.53  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Current number of archived clauses   : 39
% 0.17/0.53  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 122031
% 0.17/0.53  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65549
% 0.17/0.53  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 517
% 0.17/0.53  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120
% 0.17/0.53  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.53  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 64206
% 0.17/0.53  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1747
% 0.17/0.53  
% 0.17/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.53  % User time                : 0.075 s
% 0.17/0.53  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.53  % Total time               : 0.080 s
% 0.17/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4508 pages
% 0.17/0.53  
% 0.17/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.53  % User time                : 0.135 s
% 0.17/0.53  % System time              : 0.026 s
% 0.17/0.53  % Total time               : 0.161 s
% 0.17/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.17/0.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------