↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM317+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:40 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.82s 0.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  24 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   84 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   84 (  40   ~;  35   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   0 sgn  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(add_digit_digit_digit,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X25),rdnn(X21),rdnn(X24),rdnn(n0))
        & rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X25),rdnn(n0)) )
     => rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X21),rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X24)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',add_digit_digit_digit) ).

fof(sum_entry_point_pos_neg_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X12))
        & rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X11,X12,X10)
        & rdn_positive_less(X11,X10)
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10)) )
     => sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',sum_entry_point_pos_neg_2) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0) ).

fof(sum_n5_nn2_n3,conjecture,
    sum(n5,nn2,n3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_n5_nn2_n3) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less_transitivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3))
        & rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2)) )
     => rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less_transitivity) ).

fof(rdn5,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn5) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less45,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n4),rdnn(n5)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less45) ).

fof(rdn3,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn3) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less34,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less34) ).

fof(rdnn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn2) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less23,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less23) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X77,X78,X79,X80,X81] :
      ( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X77),rdnn(X78),rdnn(X79),rdnn(X80))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X81),rdnn(X77),rdnn(X80),rdnn(n0))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X78),rdnn(X79),rdnn(X81),rdnn(n0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[add_digit_digit_digit])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X51,X52,X53,X54,X55,X56] :
      ( sum(X51,X52,X53)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X53,rdn_pos(X56))
      | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X55,X56,X54)
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X55,X54)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X52,rdn_neg(X55))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X51,rdn_pos(X54)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_pos_neg_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X3),rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n0))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X5)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X6,rdn_pos(X5))
    | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(X4,X2)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_neg(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | sum(X1,X3,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(rdnn(X4)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(X5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X4),rdnn(n5))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(n5,nn2,n3),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[sum_n5_nn2_n3]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X116,X117,X118] :
      ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X116),rdnn(X118))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X117),rdnn(X118))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X116),rdnn(X117)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less_transitivity])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn5]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(n5,nn2,n3),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
    | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n4),rdnn(n5)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less45]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5))
    | sum(n5,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn3]) ).

fof(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(n5,nn2,n3),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n4))
    | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less34]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5))
    | sum(n5,X1,n3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(n5,nn2,n3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n5)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n3))
    | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less23]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM317+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.33  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.33  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:23:32 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.34  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.82/0.76  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.82/0.76  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.82/0.76  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % new_bool_1 with pid 3199505 completed with status 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.82/0.76  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.82/0.76  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.82/0.76  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.82/0.76  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.82/0.76  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.82/0.76  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 3199511 completed with status 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 1.82/0.76  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.82/0.76  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.82/0.76  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.82/0.76  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.82/0.76  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 1.82/0.76  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 1.82/0.76  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 1.82/0.76  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.82/0.76  
% 1.82/0.76  % Proof found!
% 1.82/0.76  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.82/0.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.82/0.76  % Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 1.82/0.76  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 261
% 1.82/0.76  % Initial clauses                      : 141
% 1.82/0.76  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 141
% 1.82/0.76  % Processed clauses                    : 1529
% 1.82/0.76  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % ...subsumed                          : 250
% 1.82/0.76  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1279
% 1.82/0.76  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Backward-subsumed                    : 28
% 1.82/0.76  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Generated clauses                    : 2330
% 1.82/0.76  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2326
% 1.82/0.76  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Paramodulations                      : 2330
% 1.82/0.76  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Total rewrite steps                  : 11
% 1.82/0.76  % ...of those cached                   : 4
% 1.82/0.76  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.82/0.76  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.82/0.76  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.82/0.76  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.82/0.76  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.82/0.76  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.82/0.76  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.82/0.76  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.82/0.76  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.82/0.76  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.82/0.76  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.82/0.76  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.82/0.76  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1110
% 1.82/0.76  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 177
% 1.82/0.76  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.82/0.76  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 1.82/0.76  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 931
% 1.82/0.76  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1079
% 1.82/0.76  % ...number of literals in the above   : 5364
% 1.82/0.76  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Current number of archived clauses   : 169
% 1.82/0.76  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 268305
% 1.82/0.76  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 111386
% 1.82/0.76  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 275
% 1.82/0.76  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 244
% 1.82/0.76  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.82/0.76  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 79700
% 1.82/0.76  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1755
% 1.82/0.76  
% 1.82/0.76  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.82/0.76  % User time                : 0.304 s
% 1.82/0.76  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 1.82/0.76  % Total time               : 0.319 s
% 1.82/0.76  % Maximum resident set size: 4508 pages
% 1.82/0.76  
% 1.82/0.76  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.82/0.76  % User time                : 0.542 s
% 1.82/0.76  % System time              : 0.035 s
% 1.82/0.76  % Total time               : 0.577 s
% 1.82/0.76  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 2.26/0.76  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------