↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM325+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:51:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.57s 0.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  22 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   85 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   87 (  41   ~;  37   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   1 sgn  29   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(add_digit_digit_digit,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X25),rdnn(X21),rdnn(X24),rdnn(n0))
        & rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X25),rdnn(n0)) )
     => rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X21),rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X24)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',add_digit_digit_digit) ).

fof(sum_entry_point_pos_neg_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X12))
        & rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X11,X12,X10)
        & rdn_positive_less(X11,X10)
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10)) )
     => sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',sum_entry_point_pos_neg_2) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less_transitivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3))
        & rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2)) )
     => rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less_transitivity) ).

fof(rdn5,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn5) ).

fof(sum_what_nn2_n3,conjecture,
    ? [X1] : sum(X1,nn2,n3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_what_nn2_n3) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less45,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n4),rdnn(n5)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less45) ).

fof(rdn3,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn3) ).

fof(rdnn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn2) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less34,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less34) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less23,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less23) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X78,X79,X80,X81,X82] :
      ( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X78),rdnn(X79),rdnn(X80),rdnn(X81))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X82),rdnn(X78),rdnn(X81),rdnn(n0))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X79),rdnn(X80),rdnn(X82),rdnn(n0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[add_digit_digit_digit])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X52,X53,X54,X55,X56,X57] :
      ( sum(X52,X53,X54)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X54,rdn_pos(X57))
      | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X56,X57,X55)
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X56,X55)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X53,rdn_neg(X56))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X52,rdn_pos(X55)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_pos_neg_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X3),rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n0))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X5)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X6,rdn_pos(X5))
    | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(X4,X2)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_neg(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | sum(X1,X3,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(rdnn(X4)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(X5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X4),rdnn(n5))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X117,X118,X119] :
      ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X117),rdnn(X119))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X118),rdnn(X119))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X117),rdnn(X118)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less_transitivity])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn5]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1] : sum(X1,nn2,n3),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[sum_what_nn2_n3]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
    | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n4),rdnn(n5)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less45]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5))
    | sum(n5,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn3]) ).

fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X33] : ~ sum(X33,nn2,n3),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n4))
    | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5))
    | sum(n5,X1,n3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(X1,nn2,n3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X2),rdnn(n4))
    | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less34]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n3))
    | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less23]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : NUM325+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.45  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.46  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:24:28 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.52  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/0.73  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.57/0.73  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % new_bool_3 with pid 761493 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.57/0.73  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.57/0.73  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/0.73  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.73  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.73  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 761499 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.57/0.73  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.73  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.57/0.73  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/0.73  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.73  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.73  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.73  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.57/0.73  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.57/0.73  
% 0.57/0.73  % Proof found!
% 0.57/0.73  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.57/0.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.73  % Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 0.57/0.73  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 261
% 0.57/0.73  % Initial clauses                      : 141
% 0.57/0.73  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 141
% 0.57/0.73  % Processed clauses                    : 1495
% 0.57/0.73  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % ...subsumed                          : 252
% 0.57/0.73  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1243
% 0.57/0.73  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Backward-subsumed                    : 26
% 0.57/0.73  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Generated clauses                    : 2221
% 0.57/0.73  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2217
% 0.57/0.73  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Paramodulations                      : 2221
% 0.57/0.73  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Total rewrite steps                  : 10
% 0.57/0.73  % ...of those cached                   : 4
% 0.57/0.73  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.57/0.73  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.57/0.73  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.57/0.73  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.57/0.73  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.57/0.73  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.57/0.73  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.57/0.73  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.57/0.73  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.57/0.73  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.57/0.73  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.57/0.73  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.57/0.73  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1076
% 0.57/0.73  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 176
% 0.57/0.73  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/0.73  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.57/0.73  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 898
% 0.57/0.73  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1003
% 0.57/0.73  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4927
% 0.57/0.73  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Current number of archived clauses   : 167
% 0.57/0.73  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 258958
% 0.57/0.73  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 107200
% 0.57/0.73  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 271
% 0.57/0.73  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 221
% 0.57/0.73  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.57/0.73  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 75681
% 0.57/0.73  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1762
% 0.57/0.73  
% 0.57/0.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.73  % User time                : 0.156 s
% 0.57/0.73  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.57/0.73  % Total time               : 0.163 s
% 0.57/0.73  % Maximum resident set size: 4764 pages
% 0.57/0.73  
% 0.57/0.73  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.73  % User time                : 0.317 s
% 0.57/0.73  % System time              : 0.021 s
% 0.57/0.73  % Total time               : 0.338 s
% 0.57/0.73  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.57/0.73  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------