↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM330+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:31:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.41s 23.60s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   67 (  30   ~;  27   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   0 sgn  24   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(add_digit_digit_digit,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X25),rdnn(n0))
        & rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X25),rdnn(X21),rdnn(X24),rdnn(n0)) )
     => rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X21),rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X24)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',add_digit_digit_digit) ).

fof(sum_entry_point_pos_pos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10))
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
        & rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X10,X11,X12)
        & rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X12)) )
     => sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',sum_entry_point_pos_pos) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n8_n0_n8_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n8),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n8),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n8_n0_n8_n0) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n4_n4_n8_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n4),rdnn(n4),rdnn(n8),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n4_n4_n8_n0) ).

fof(rdn8,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n8,rdn_pos(rdnn(n8))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn8) ).

fof(sum_n4_n4_n8,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2] :
      ( sum(X1,X2,n8)
      & X1 = n4
      & X2 = n4 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',sum_n4_n4_n8) ).

fof(rdn4,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n4,rdn_pos(rdnn(n4))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn4) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X26,X27,X28,X29,X30] :
      ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X27),rdnn(X28),rdnn(X30),rdnn(n0))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X30),rdnn(X26),rdnn(X29),rdnn(n0))
      | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X26),rdnn(X27),rdnn(X28),rdnn(X29)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[add_digit_digit_digit])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X13,rdn_pos(X16))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X14,rdn_pos(X17))
      | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X16,X17,X18)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X15,rdn_pos(X18))
      | sum(X13,X14,X15) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_pos_pos])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(X4))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X5),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X4),rdnn(n0))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n8),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n8),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n8_n0_n8_n0]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
    | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X5,X6,X4)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X6))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X5)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n8))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n8),rdnn(n0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n8),rdnn(n0))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n8)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(X5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n4),rdnn(n4),rdnn(n8),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n4_n4_n8_n0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n8)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n4)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    rdn_translate(n8,rdn_pos(rdnn(n8))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn8]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X2] :
        ( sum(X1,X2,n8)
        & X1 = n4
        & X2 = n4 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[sum_n4_n4_n8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( sum(X1,X2,n8)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n4)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rdn_translate(n4,rdn_pos(rdnn(n4))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn4]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ sum(X3,X4,n8)
      | X3 != n4
      | X4 != n4 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( sum(X1,n4,n8)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != n4
    | X2 != n4
    | ~ sum(X2,X1,n8) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    sum(n4,n4,n8),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : NUM330+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 18:55:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.41/23.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.52  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.60  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.41/23.60  
% 0.41/23.60  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.41/23.60  # OLD status Res
% 0.41/23.60  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 0.41/23.60  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 0.41/23.60  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/23.60  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 0.41/23.60  
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof found!
% 0.41/23.60  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/23.60  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object generating inferences   : 7
% 0.41/23.60  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.41/23.60  # Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 0.41/23.60  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 266
% 0.41/23.60  # Initial clauses                      : 136
% 0.41/23.60  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 136
% 0.41/23.60  # Processed clauses                    : 242
% 0.41/23.60  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # ...subsumed                          : 13
% 0.41/23.60  # ...remaining for further processing  : 229
% 0.41/23.60  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Generated clauses                    : 283
% 0.41/23.60  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 279
% 0.41/23.60  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Paramodulations                      : 283
% 0.41/23.60  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Current number of processed clauses  : 229
% 0.41/23.60  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 132
% 0.41/23.60  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/23.60  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.41/23.60  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 97
% 0.41/23.60  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 173
% 0.41/23.60  # ...number of literals in the above   : 868
% 0.41/23.60  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1955
% 0.41/23.60  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1208
% 0.41/23.60  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 13
% 0.41/23.60  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.41/23.60  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.41/23.60  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 17522
% 0.41/23.60  
% 0.41/23.60  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/23.60  # User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.41/23.60  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.41/23.60  # Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.41/23.60  # Maximum resident set size: 4788 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------