↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM334+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:42 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  31   ~;  26   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   0 sgn  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(add_digit_digit_digit,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X25),rdnn(X21),rdnn(X24),rdnn(n0))
        & rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X25),rdnn(n0)) )
     => rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X21),rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X24)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',add_digit_digit_digit) ).

fof(sum_entry_point_pos_pos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X12))
        & rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X10,X11,X12)
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10)) )
     => sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',sum_entry_point_pos_pos) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n7_n0_n7_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n7_n0_n7_n0) ).

fof(diff_n7_n5_n2,conjecture,
    difference(n7,n5,n2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',diff_n7_n5_n2) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n5_n2_n7_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n2),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n5_n2_n7_n0) ).

fof(rdn7,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n7,rdn_pos(rdnn(n7))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn7) ).

fof(minus_entry_point,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( sum(X2,X3,X1)
    <=> difference(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',minus_entry_point) ).

fof(rdn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn2) ).

fof(rdn5,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn5) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X80,X81,X82,X83,X84] :
      ( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X80),rdnn(X81),rdnn(X82),rdnn(X83))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X84),rdnn(X80),rdnn(X83),rdnn(n0))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X81),rdnn(X82),rdnn(X84),rdnn(n0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[add_digit_digit_digit])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41] :
      ( sum(X36,X37,X38)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X38,rdn_pos(X41))
      | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X39,X40,X41)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X37,rdn_pos(X40))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X36,rdn_pos(X39)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_pos_pos])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X3),rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n0))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X5)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n7_n0_n7_n0]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X6,rdn_pos(X5))
    | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | sum(X1,X3,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n7)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ difference(n7,n5,n2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[diff_n7_n5_n2]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(X4)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(X5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n7)))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n2),rdnn(n7),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n5_n2_n7_n0]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ difference(n7,n5,n2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n7)))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    rdn_translate(n7,rdn_pos(rdnn(n7))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn7]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ difference(n7,n5,n2),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X33,X34,X35] :
      ( ( sum(X34,X35,X33)
        | ~ difference(X33,X34,X35) )
      & ( difference(X33,X34,X35)
        | ~ sum(X34,X35,X33) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[minus_entry_point])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
    | sum(X1,X2,n7) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ difference(n7,n5,n2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | difference(X3,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | sum(X1,n2,n7) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn5]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(n5,n2,n7),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM334+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:27:59 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.19/0.47  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % new_bool_3 with pid 1991111 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.47  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.19/0.47  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.47  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1991117 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.47  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.19/0.47  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.47  % Search class: FHUSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47  % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.47  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % Proof found!
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.47  % Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 0.19/0.47  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 265
% 0.19/0.47  % Initial clauses                      : 138
% 0.19/0.47  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 138
% 0.19/0.47  % Processed clauses                    : 712
% 0.19/0.47  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % ...subsumed                          : 120
% 0.19/0.47  % ...remaining for further processing  : 592
% 0.19/0.47  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Generated clauses                    : 594
% 0.19/0.47  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 592
% 0.19/0.47  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Paramodulations                      : 594
% 0.19/0.47  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.47  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.47  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.47  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.47  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.47  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.47  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47  % Current number of processed clauses  : 454
% 0.19/0.47  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 144
% 0.19/0.47  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.47  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.19/0.47  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 308
% 0.19/0.47  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 156
% 0.19/0.47  % ...number of literals in the above   : 932
% 0.19/0.47  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Current number of archived clauses   : 138
% 0.19/0.47  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21759
% 0.19/0.47  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16623
% 0.19/0.47  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 120
% 0.19/0.47  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.19/0.47  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.47  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 26329
% 0.19/0.47  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1756
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  % User time                : 0.029 s
% 0.19/0.47  % System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.47  % Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.19/0.47  % Maximum resident set size: 4508 pages
% 0.19/0.47  
% 0.19/0.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47  % User time                : 0.060 s
% 0.19/0.47  % System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.19/0.47  % Total time               : 0.079 s
% 0.19/0.47  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.19/0.47  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------