↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : NUM341+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4ktnHLyYbH true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:46:11 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.58s 0.79s
% Output   : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (  11   ~;   6   |;   2   &;  69   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    3 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0   ^;  26   !;   6   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(difference_type,type,
    difference: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sum_type,type,
    sum: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(minus_entry_point,axiom,
    ! [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
      ( ( sum @ Y @ Z @ X )
    <=> ( difference @ X @ Y @ Z ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl34,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( difference @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( sum @ X1 @ X2 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[minus_entry_point]) ).

thf(add_same_as_subtract,conjecture,
    ? [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
      ( ( sum @ X @ Y @ Z )
    <=> ( ( difference @ Z @ Y @ X )
        & ( difference @ Z @ X @ Y ) ) ) ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X: $i,Y: $i,Z: $i] :
        ( ( sum @ X @ Y @ Z )
      <=> ( ( difference @ Z @ Y @ X )
          & ( difference @ Z @ X @ Y ) ) ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[add_same_as_subtract]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl107,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ ( difference @ X3 @ X2 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( difference @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( sum @ X2 @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl35,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( sum @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( difference @ X2 @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[minus_entry_point]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl397,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ ( difference @ X3 @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( difference @ X3 @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl107,zip_derived_cl35]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl398,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ~ ( difference @ X1 @ X0 @ X0 ),
    inference(eq_fact,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl397]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl401,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ~ ( sum @ X0 @ X0 @ X1 ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl34,zip_derived_cl398]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl105,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( difference @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ( sum @ X2 @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl398_001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ~ ( difference @ X1 @ X0 @ X0 ),
    inference(eq_fact,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl397]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl420,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( sum @ X0 @ X0 @ X1 ),
    inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl105,zip_derived_cl398]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl424,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl401,zip_derived_cl420]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : NUM341+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.4ktnHLyYbH true
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 16:27:38 EDT 2025
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.36  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.36  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.36  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.55/0.67  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.55/0.67  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.55/0.67  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.70  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.57/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.57/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.57/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.79  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.58/0.79  % BCE start: 108
% 0.58/0.79  % BCE eliminated: 6
% 0.58/0.79  % PE start: 102
% 0.58/0.79  logic: eq
% 0.58/0.79  % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.58/0.79  % done 34 iterations in 0.046s
% 0.58/0.79  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.58/0.79  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.79  
% 0.58/0.79  
% 0.58/0.79  % Terminating...
% 0.58/0.86  % Runner terminated.
% 1.76/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------