↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM345+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:44:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   89 (  39   ~;  36   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   0 sgn  40   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(add_digit_digit_digit,axiom,
    ! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
      ( ( rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X25),rdnn(X21),rdnn(X24),rdnn(n0))
        & rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X25),rdnn(n0)) )
     => rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X21),rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X24)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',add_digit_digit_digit) ).

fof(sum_entry_point_pos_pos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X12))
        & rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X10,X11,X12)
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10)) )
     => sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',sum_entry_point_pos_pos) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0) ).

fof(rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0,axiom,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0) ).

fof(sum_n2_n3_less_n6,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( sum(n2,n3,X1)
     => less(X1,n6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_n2_n3_less_n6) ).

fof(rdn5,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn5) ).

fof(unique_sum,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X15,X16] :
      ( ( sum(X1,X2,X16)
        & sum(X1,X2,X15) )
     => X15 = X16 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',unique_sum) ).

fof(rdn3,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn3) ).

fof(less_entry_point_pos_pos,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X10,X11] :
      ( ( rdn_positive_less(X10,X11)
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11))
        & rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X10)) )
     => less(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_entry_point_pos_pos) ).

fof(rdn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn2) ).

fof(rdn6,axiom,
    rdn_translate(n6,rdn_pos(rdnn(n6))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn6) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less56,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n6)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less56) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X99,X100,X101,X102,X103] :
      ( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X99),rdnn(X100),rdnn(X101),rdnn(X102))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X103),rdnn(X99),rdnn(X102),rdnn(n0))
      | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X100),rdnn(X101),rdnn(X103),rdnn(n0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[add_digit_digit_digit])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X48,X49,X50,X51,X52,X53] :
      ( sum(X48,X49,X50)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X50,rdn_pos(X53))
      | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X51,X52,X53)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X49,rdn_pos(X52))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X48,rdn_pos(X51)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_pos_pos])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X3),rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n0))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X5)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X6,rdn_pos(X5))
    | ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | sum(X1,X3,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0))
    | rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(X4)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(X5)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_digit_add_n2_n3_n5_n0]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( sum(n2,n3,X1)
       => less(X1,n6) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[sum_n2_n3_less_n6]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
    | sum(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn5]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X80,X81,X82,X83] :
      ( X82 = X83
      | ~ sum(X80,X81,X83)
      | ~ sum(X80,X81,X82) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unique_sum])])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ less(esk1_0,n6)
    & sum(n2,n3,esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3)))
    | sum(X1,X2,n5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn3]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X34,X35,X36,X37] :
      ( less(X34,X35)
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X36,X37)
      | ~ rdn_translate(X35,rdn_pos(X37))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X34,rdn_pos(X36)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_pos_pos])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ sum(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ sum(X1,X2,X3)
    | X3 = X4 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    sum(n2,n3,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
    | sum(X1,n3,n5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,X4)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | less(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    rdn_translate(n6,rdn_pos(rdnn(n6))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn6]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sum(n2,n3,X1)
    | X1 = esk1_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    sum(n2,n3,n5),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X2))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(X2,rdnn(n6))
    | less(X1,n6) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n6)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less56]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less(esk1_0,n6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = n5,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    less(n5,n6),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_22]),c_0_37])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : NUM345+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.41  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.41  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:18:11 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % new_bool_1 with pid 1213490 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.63  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.24/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.63  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.63  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1213492 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.63  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.63  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.63  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.24/0.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.63  
% 0.24/0.63  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.63  % Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 0.24/0.63  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 258
% 0.24/0.63  % Initial clauses                      : 147
% 0.24/0.63  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 147
% 1.13/0.63  % Processed clauses                    : 1308
% 1.13/0.63  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % ...subsumed                          : 350
% 1.13/0.63  % ...remaining for further processing  : 958
% 1.13/0.63  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 1.13/0.63  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % Backward-subsumed                    : 39
% 1.13/0.63  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 1.13/0.63  % Generated clauses                    : 2086
% 1.13/0.63  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2068
% 1.13/0.63  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % Paramodulations                      : 2083
% 1.13/0.63  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 1.13/0.63  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 1.13/0.63  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % Total rewrite steps                  : 39
% 1.13/0.63  % ...of those cached                   : 15
% 1.13/0.63  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.13/0.63  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.13/0.63  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.13/0.63  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.13/0.63  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.13/0.63  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.13/0.63  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.13/0.63  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.13/0.63  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.13/0.63  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.13/0.63  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.13/0.63  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.13/0.63  % Current number of processed clauses  : 912
% 1.13/0.63  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 173
% 1.13/0.63  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.13/0.63  %    Negative unit clauses             : 68
% 1.13/0.63  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 671
% 1.13/0.63  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 903
% 1.13/0.63  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4671
% 1.13/0.63  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % Current number of archived clauses   : 45
% 1.13/0.63  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 102199
% 1.13/0.63  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63624
% 1.13/0.63  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 199
% 1.13/0.63  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5179
% 1.13/0.63  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 1.13/0.63  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 1.13/0.63  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.13/0.63  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 64241
% 1.13/0.63  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1851
% 1.13/0.63  
% 1.13/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.13/0.63  % User time                : 0.102 s
% 1.13/0.63  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 1.13/0.63  % Total time               : 0.111 s
% 1.13/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 4508 pages
% 1.13/0.63  
% 1.13/0.63  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.13/0.63  % User time                : 0.205 s
% 1.13/0.63  % System time              : 0.026 s
% 1.13/0.63  % Total time               : 0.231 s
% 1.13/0.63  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 1.13/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------