↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : NUM388+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:57:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.12s 1.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (  33   ~;  30   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   1 sgn  31   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t4_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( in(X1,X2)
        & element(X2,powerset(X3)) )
     => element(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_subset) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).

fof(d2_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
         => subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_ordinal1) ).

fof(t19_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ordinal(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ordinal(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( epsilon_transitive(X3)
             => ( ( in(X3,X1)
                  & in(X1,X2) )
               => in(X3,X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_ordinal1) ).

fof(cc1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ordinal(X1)
     => ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
        & epsilon_connected(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_ordinal1) ).

fof(t7_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( in(X1,X2)
        & empty(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).

fof(t2_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,X2)
     => ( empty(X2)
        | in(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X82,X83,X84] :
      ( ~ in(X82,X83)
      | ~ element(X83,powerset(X84))
      | element(X82,X84) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X80,X81] :
      ( ( ~ element(X80,powerset(X81))
        | subset(X80,X81) )
      & ( ~ subset(X80,X81)
        | element(X80,powerset(X81)) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( element(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X55,X56,X57] :
      ( ( ~ epsilon_transitive(X55)
        | ~ in(X56,X55)
        | subset(X56,X55) )
      & ( in(esk1_1(X57),X57)
        | epsilon_transitive(X57) )
      & ( ~ subset(esk1_1(X57),X57)
        | epsilon_transitive(X57) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_ordinal1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ordinal(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ordinal(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( epsilon_transitive(X3)
               => ( ( in(X3,X1)
                    & in(X1,X2) )
                 => in(X3,X2) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t19_ordinal1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( element(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ epsilon_transitive(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal(esk14_0)
    & ordinal(esk15_0)
    & epsilon_transitive(esk16_0)
    & in(esk16_0,esk14_0)
    & in(esk14_0,esk15_0)
    & ~ in(esk16_0,esk15_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X51] :
      ( ( epsilon_transitive(X51)
        | ~ ordinal(X51) )
      & ( epsilon_connected(X51)
        | ~ ordinal(X51) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc1_ordinal1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( element(X1,X2)
    | ~ epsilon_transitive(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk16_0,esk14_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X89,X90] :
      ( ~ in(X89,X90)
      | ~ empty(X90) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t7_boole])]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X78,X79] :
      ( ~ element(X78,X79)
      | empty(X79)
      | in(X78,X79) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(esk16_0,X1)
    | ~ epsilon_transitive(X1)
    | ~ in(esk14_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    epsilon_transitive(esk15_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk14_0,esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ empty(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( empty(X2)
    | in(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk16_0,esk15_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ empty(esk15_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk16_0,esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06  % Problem    : NUM388+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.07/0.24  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.24  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.24  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.24  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.24  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 00:31:15 EDT 2026
% 0.07/0.24  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.07/0.25  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.12/1.62  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.12/1.62  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.12/1.62  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.12/1.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.12/1.62  % Total time : 1.363s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------