↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM388+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:32:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 1.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (  33   ~;  30   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (   4 sgn  33   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t4_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( in(X1,X2)
        & element(X2,powerset(X3)) )
     => element(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t4_subset) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t3_subset) ).

fof(d2_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
         => subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d2_ordinal1) ).

fof(t19_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ordinal(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ordinal(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( epsilon_transitive(X3)
             => ( ( in(X3,X1)
                  & in(X1,X2) )
               => in(X3,X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t19_ordinal1) ).

fof(cc1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ordinal(X1)
     => ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
        & epsilon_connected(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cc1_ordinal1) ).

fof(t7_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( in(X1,X2)
        & empty(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t7_boole) ).

fof(t2_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,X2)
     => ( empty(X2)
        | in(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t2_subset) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ in(X4,X5)
      | ~ element(X5,powerset(X6))
      | element(X4,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_subset])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ element(X3,powerset(X4))
        | subset(X3,X4) )
      & ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
        | element(X3,powerset(X4)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( element(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X2))
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3] :
      ( ( ~ epsilon_transitive(X3)
        | ~ in(X4,X3)
        | subset(X4,X3) )
      & ( in(esk1_1(X3),X3)
        | epsilon_transitive(X3) )
      & ( ~ subset(esk1_1(X3),X3)
        | epsilon_transitive(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_ordinal1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ordinal(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ordinal(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( epsilon_transitive(X3)
               => ( ( in(X3,X1)
                    & in(X1,X2) )
                 => in(X3,X2) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t19_ordinal1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( element(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ epsilon_transitive(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal(esk14_0)
    & ordinal(esk15_0)
    & epsilon_transitive(esk16_0)
    & in(esk16_0,esk14_0)
    & in(esk14_0,esk15_0)
    & ~ in(esk16_0,esk15_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( epsilon_transitive(X2)
        | ~ ordinal(X2) )
      & ( epsilon_connected(X2)
        | ~ ordinal(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc1_ordinal1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( element(X1,X2)
    | ~ epsilon_transitive(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk16_0,esk14_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ in(X3,X4)
      | ~ empty(X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t7_boole])]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ element(X3,X4)
      | empty(X4)
      | in(X3,X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(esk16_0,X1)
    | ~ epsilon_transitive(X1)
    | ~ in(esk14_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    epsilon_transitive(esk15_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk14_0,esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | empty(X2)
    | ~ element(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk16_0,esk15_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ empty(esk15_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk16_0,esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : NUM388+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 09:54:30 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/1.39  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.39  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.21/1.39  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.21/1.39  
% 0.21/1.39  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.21/1.39  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.21/1.39  # Parsed axioms                        : 32
% 0.21/1.39  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 17
% 0.21/1.39  # Initial clauses                      : 25
% 0.21/1.39  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 25
% 0.21/1.39  # Processed clauses                    : 36
% 0.21/1.39  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.21/1.39  # ...remaining for further processing  : 35
% 0.21/1.39  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.21/1.39  # Generated clauses                    : 13
% 0.21/1.39  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 11
% 0.21/1.39  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Paramodulations                      : 13
% 0.21/1.39  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of processed clauses  : 32
% 0.21/1.39  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
% 0.21/1.39  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.39  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.21/1.39  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.39  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.21/1.39  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.21/1.39  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.21/1.39  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.21/1.39  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.21/1.39  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1181
% 0.21/1.39  
% 0.21/1.39  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.39  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.21/1.39  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/1.39  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.21/1.39  # Maximum resident set size: 2692 pages
% 0.21/1.39  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.39  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.21/1.39  
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof found!
% 0.21/1.39  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/1.39  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object total steps             : 32
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object conjectures             : 12
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 9
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object generating inferences   : 7
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.21/1.39  # Parsed axioms                        : 32
% 0.21/1.39  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Initial clauses                      : 60
% 0.21/1.39  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.21/1.39  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 58
% 0.21/1.39  # Processed clauses                    : 92
% 0.21/1.39  # ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.21/1.39  # ...remaining for further processing  : 82
% 0.21/1.39  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.21/1.39  # Generated clauses                    : 63
% 0.21/1.39  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 56
% 0.21/1.39  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # Paramodulations                      : 63
% 0.21/1.39  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of processed clauses  : 76
% 0.21/1.39  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 35
% 0.21/1.39  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.39  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.21/1.39  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 34
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.21/1.39  # ...number of literals in the above   : 52
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.21/1.39  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 238
% 0.21/1.39  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 195
% 0.21/1.39  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10
% 0.21/1.39  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46
% 0.21/1.39  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.21/1.39  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2701
% 0.21/1.39  
% 0.21/1.39  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.39  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.21/1.39  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.21/1.39  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.21/1.39  # Maximum resident set size: 2924 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------