↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : NUM393+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:57:14 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  24   ~;  26   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t25_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ordinal(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ordinal(X2)
         => inclusion_comparable(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t25_ordinal1) ).

fof(connectedness_r1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ordinal(X1)
        & ordinal(X2) )
     => ( ordinal_subset(X1,X2)
        | ordinal_subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',connectedness_r1_ordinal1) ).

fof(d9_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        | subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_xboole_0) ).

fof(redefinition_r1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ordinal(X1)
        & ordinal(X2) )
     => ( ordinal_subset(X1,X2)
      <=> subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_r1_ordinal1) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ordinal(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ordinal(X2)
           => inclusion_comparable(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t25_ordinal1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X64,X65] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X64)
      | ~ ordinal(X65)
      | ordinal_subset(X64,X65)
      | ordinal_subset(X65,X64) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[connectedness_r1_ordinal1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal(esk13_0)
    & ordinal(esk14_0)
    & ~ inclusion_comparable(esk13_0,esk14_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ordinal_subset(X1,X2)
    | ordinal_subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk14_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X66,X67] :
      ( ( ~ inclusion_comparable(X66,X67)
        | subset(X66,X67)
        | subset(X67,X66) )
      & ( ~ subset(X66,X67)
        | inclusion_comparable(X66,X67) )
      & ( ~ subset(X67,X66)
        | inclusion_comparable(X66,X67) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d9_xboole_0])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X81,X82] :
      ( ( ~ ordinal_subset(X81,X82)
        | subset(X81,X82)
        | ~ ordinal(X81)
        | ~ ordinal(X82) )
      & ( ~ subset(X81,X82)
        | ordinal_subset(X81,X82)
        | ~ ordinal(X81)
        | ~ ordinal(X82) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_r1_ordinal1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal_subset(X1,esk14_0)
    | ordinal_subset(esk14_0,X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inclusion_comparable(esk13_0,esk14_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal_subset(esk14_0,esk13_0)
    | ordinal_subset(esk13_0,esk14_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk14_0,esk13_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( inclusion_comparable(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal_subset(esk13_0,esk14_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]),c_0_8])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk13_0,esk14_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_19]),c_0_8]),c_0_12])]),c_0_20]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : NUM393+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 00:30:56 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.375s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------