↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM394+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:24:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.48s 6.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  167 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  183 (  72   ~;  74   |;  22   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   0 sgn  54   !;   6   ?;   9   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ordinal(X0)
     => ( epsilon_connected(X0)
        & epsilon_transitive(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_ordinal1) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ordinal(X1)
        & ordinal(X0) )
     => ( ordinal_subset(X1,X0)
        | ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',connectedness_r1_ordinal1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( epsilon_transitive(X0)
    <=> ! [X1] :
          ( in(X1,X0)
         => subset(X1,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_ordinal1) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ordinal(X1)
        & ordinal(X0) )
     => ( ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      <=> subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_r1_ordinal1) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ordinal(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ordinal(X1)
         => ~ ( ~ in(X1,X0)
              & X0 != X1
              & ~ in(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_ordinal1) ).

fof(f29,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ordinal(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( ordinal(X1)
         => ( in(X1,X0)
            | ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t26_ordinal1) ).

fof(f30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ordinal(X0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ordinal(X1)
           => ( in(X1,X0)
              | ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f29]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ( epsilon_connected(X0)
        & epsilon_transitive(X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X1,X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X1,X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( epsilon_transitive(X0)
    <=> ! [X1] :
          ( ~ in(X1,X0)
          | subset(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ( ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      <=> subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ( ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      <=> subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ ordinal(X1)
          | in(X1,X0)
          | X0 = X1
          | in(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ ordinal(X1)
          | in(X1,X0)
          | X0 = X1
          | in(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ordinal(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ordinal(X1)
          & ~ in(X1,X0)
          & ~ ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ordinal(X0)
      & ? [X1] :
          ( ordinal(X1)
          & ~ in(X1,X0)
          & ~ ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ epsilon_transitive(X0)
        | ! [X1] :
            ( ~ in(X1,X0)
            | subset(X1,X0) ) )
      & ( ? [X1] :
            ( in(X1,X0)
            & ~ subset(X1,X0) )
        | epsilon_transitive(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ epsilon_transitive(X0)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X0)
            | subset(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ? [X1] :
            ( in(X1,X0)
            & ~ subset(X1,X0) )
        | epsilon_transitive(X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f73]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ epsilon_transitive(X0)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X0)
            | subset(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ( in(sK0(X0),X0)
          & ~ subset(sK0(X0),X0) )
        | epsilon_transitive(X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X1,sK0(X0))],[f74]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ( ( ~ ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
          | subset(X0,X1) )
        & ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
          | ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ( ordinal(sK13)
    & ordinal(sK14)
    & ~ in(sK14,sK13)
    & ~ ordinal_subset(sK13,sK14) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13,sK14]),skolemize(X0,sK13),skolemize(X1,sK14)],[f64]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X0)
      | epsilon_transitive(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X1,X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X2,X0] :
      ( ~ epsilon_transitive(X0)
      | ~ in(X2,X0)
      | subset(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ordinal_subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | in(X1,X0)
      | X0 = X1
      | in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ordinal(sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ordinal(sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ~ in(sK14,sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f139,plain,
    ~ ordinal_subset(sK13,sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( epsilon_transitive(X0)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ordinal_subset(X1,X0)
      | ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f99]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ epsilon_transitive(X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ordinal_subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f131]) ).

tcf(c_91,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( in(X1,X0)
      | in(X0,X1)
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ ordinal(X1)
      | ~ ordinal(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).

tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordinal_subset(sK13,sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f139]) ).

tcf(c_93,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK14,sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f138]) ).

tcf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

tcf(c_95,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f136]) ).

tcf(c_1574,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(sK13),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_95]) ).

tcf(c_1575,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(sK14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_94]) ).

tcf(c_1576,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(sK14,sK13),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_93]) ).

tcf(c_1577,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordinal_subset(sK13,sK14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_92]) ).

tcf(c_2162,plain,
    epsilon_transitive(sK14),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1575,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_2316,plain,
    ( ordinal_subset(sK14,sK13)
    | ~ ordinal(sK14)
    | ~ ordinal(sK13) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_1577]) ).

tcf(c_2320,plain,
    ordinal_subset(sK14,sK13),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2316,c_1575,c_1574]) ).

tcf(c_2389,plain,
    ( in(sK13,sK14)
    | ( sK13 = sK14 )
    | ~ ordinal(sK14)
    | ~ ordinal(sK13) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_1576]) ).

tcf(c_2394,plain,
    ( in(sK13,sK14)
    | ( sK13 = sK14 ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2389,c_1575,c_1574]) ).

tcf(c_2432,plain,
    ( subset(sK13,sK14)
    | ( sK13 = sK14 )
    | ~ epsilon_transitive(sK14) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2394,c_58]) ).

tcf(c_2440,plain,
    ( subset(sK13,sK14)
    | ( sK13 = sK14 ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2432,c_2162]) ).

tcf(c_2460,plain,
    ( ordinal_subset(sK13,sK14)
    | ( sK13 = sK14 )
    | ~ ordinal(sK14)
    | ~ ordinal(sK13) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2440,c_86]) ).

tcf(c_2461,plain,
    sK13 = sK14,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2460,c_1577,c_1575,c_1574]) ).

tcf(c_2463,plain,
    ordinal_subset(sK13,sK13),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2320,c_2461]) ).

tcf(c_2465,plain,
    ~ ordinal_subset(sK13,sK13),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1577,c_2461]) ).

tcf(c_2468,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2463,c_2465]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM394+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/5.38  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:45:36 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/5.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.45  % Proving...
% 2.48/6.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.48/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.48/6.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.48/6.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 19 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % 
% 2.48/6.30  % clauses                               33
% 2.48/6.30  % conjectures                           4
% 2.48/6.30  % EPR                                   28
% 2.48/6.30  % Horn                                  29
% 2.48/6.30  % unary                                 14
% 2.48/6.30  % binary                                10
% 2.48/6.30  % lits                                  66
% 2.48/6.30  % lits eq                               3
% 2.48/6.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.48/6.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.48/6.30  % fd_cond                               1
% 2.48/6.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 2.48/6.30  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ 
% 2.48/6.30  % Current options:
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ 
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % 
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 2.48/6.30  % 
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.48/6.30  
% 2.48/6.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------