↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM411+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:32:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.26s 1.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   86 (  36   ~;  32   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   3 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t47_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X1)
         => transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t47_ordinal1) ).

fof(t1_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X3) )
     => subset(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t1_xboole_1) ).

fof(d8_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2)
        & transfinite_sequence(X2) )
     => ( transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
      <=> subset(relation_rng(X2),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d8_ordinal1) ).

fof(dt_m1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
     => ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2)
        & transfinite_sequence(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_m1_ordinal1) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( subset(X1,X2)
       => ! [X3] :
            ( transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X1)
           => transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t47_ordinal1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
      | ~ subset(X5,X6)
      | subset(X4,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & transfinite_sequence_of(esk3_0,esk1_0)
    & ~ transfinite_sequence_of(esk3_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3)
        | subset(relation_rng(X4),X3)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence(X4) )
      & ( ~ subset(relation_rng(X4),X3)
        | transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_ordinal1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( relation(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3) )
      & ( function(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3) )
      & ( transfinite_sequence(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_m1_ordinal1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    transfinite_sequence_of(esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( relation(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( function(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk2_0)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),esk1_0)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    transfinite_sequence(esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ transfinite_sequence_of(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_rng(esk3_0),esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_13]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : NUM411+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 05:26:07 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/1.44  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.26/1.44  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.26/1.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.26/1.44  
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof found!
% 0.26/1.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/1.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object total steps             : 26
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object conjectures             : 13
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 10
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object generating inferences   : 7
% 0.26/1.44  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
% 0.26/1.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.26/1.44  # Parsed axioms                        : 43
% 0.26/1.44  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 25
% 0.26/1.44  # Initial clauses                      : 31
% 0.26/1.44  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 31
% 0.26/1.44  # Processed clauses                    : 66
% 0.26/1.44  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.26/1.44  # ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.26/1.44  # ...remaining for further processing  : 62
% 0.26/1.44  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.26/1.44  # Generated clauses                    : 101
% 0.26/1.44  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 79
% 0.26/1.44  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.26/1.44  # Paramodulations                      : 101
% 0.26/1.44  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of processed clauses  : 56
% 0.26/1.44  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 24
% 0.26/1.44  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/1.44  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.26/1.44  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 28
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40
% 0.26/1.44  # ...number of literals in the above   : 138
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.26/1.44  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 117
% 0.26/1.44  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 83
% 0.26/1.44  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.26/1.44  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 0.26/1.44  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.26/1.44  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.26/1.44  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/1.44  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2379
% 0.26/1.44  
% 0.26/1.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/1.44  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.26/1.44  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.26/1.44  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.26/1.44  # Maximum resident set size: 2988 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------