↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : NUM411+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:47:36 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 11.58s 2.32s
% Output   : Proof 19.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : NUM411+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 08:25:57 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.52/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.52/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.52/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.52/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.52/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.52/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.52/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.52/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.52/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.52/0.60  
% 0.52/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.52/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.52/0.62  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.52/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.52/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.52/0.62  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.52/0.62  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.52/0.62  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.52/0.62  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.84/1.10  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.10  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.21/1.14  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.21/1.14  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.21/1.14  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.21/1.14  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.21/1.14  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 6.01/1.53  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.01/1.56  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.01/1.56  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 6.29/1.58  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.29/1.61  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 6.29/1.63  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.29/1.64  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.85/1.65  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.08/1.69  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.08/1.71  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 9.30/2.00  Prover 3: gave up
% 9.30/2.01  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 9.96/2.06  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 10.37/2.12  Prover 1: gave up
% 10.37/2.13  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 10.37/2.17  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 10.68/2.19  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.68/2.20  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.58/2.31  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.58/2.32  Prover 0: proved (1703ms)
% 11.58/2.32  
% 11.58/2.32  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.58/2.32  
% 11.58/2.32  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 11.58/2.33  Prover 2: stopped
% 11.58/2.33  Prover 6: stopped
% 11.58/2.33  Prover 5: stopped
% 11.58/2.33  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 11.58/2.33  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.58/2.33  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 11.58/2.33  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 12.13/2.38  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 12.13/2.38  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 12.13/2.39  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 12.13/2.39  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 12.13/2.40  Prover 7: gave up
% 12.13/2.40  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 12.60/2.43  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 12.60/2.44  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.60/2.44  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.93/2.46  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.93/2.47  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.93/2.48  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.93/2.49  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.93/2.53  Prover 10: gave up
% 13.87/2.60  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.87/2.61  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.87/2.62  Prover 8: gave up
% 13.87/2.63  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.29/2.64  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.26/2.82  Prover 19: gave up
% 19.47/3.34  Prover 4: Found proof (size 60)
% 19.47/3.34  Prover 4: proved (2716ms)
% 19.47/3.34  Prover 13: stopped
% 19.47/3.34  Prover 16: stopped
% 19.47/3.34  Prover 11: stopped
% 19.47/3.34  
% 19.47/3.34  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 19.47/3.34  
% 19.47/3.35  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 19.47/3.35  Assumptions after simplification:
% 19.47/3.35  ---------------------------------
% 19.47/3.35  
% 19.47/3.35    (d8_ordinal1)
% 19.78/3.38     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (relation_rng(v1)
% 19.78/3.38        = v2) |  ~ (subset(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] : 
% 19.78/3.38      ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : (transfinite_sequence(v1) = v6 &
% 19.78/3.38        transfinite_sequence_of(v1, v0) = v7 & relation(v1) = v4 & function(v1) =
% 19.78/3.38        v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v3 = 0) &
% 19.78/3.38            ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v7 = 0))))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: any]
% 19.78/3.38    : ( ~ (transfinite_sequence_of(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3:
% 19.78/3.38        any] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: any] :
% 19.78/3.38      (relation_rng(v1) = v6 & subset(v6, v0) = v7 & transfinite_sequence(v1) = v5
% 19.78/3.38        & relation(v1) = v3 & function(v1) = v4 & $i(v6) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 =
% 19.78/3.38            0) |  ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 = 0) | v2 = 0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v7 =
% 19.78/3.38              0)))))
% 19.78/3.38  
% 19.78/3.38    (dt_m1_ordinal1)
% 19.78/3.38     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (transfinite_sequence_of(v1, v0) = 0) |  ~
% 19.78/3.38      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (transfinite_sequence(v1) = 0 & relation(v1) = 0 &
% 19.78/3.38        function(v1) = 0))
% 19.78/3.38  
% 19.78/3.38    (t1_xboole_1)
% 19.78/3.38     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 19.78/3.38      (subset(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (subset(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 19.78/3.38      $i(v0) |  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & subset(v0, v1) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $i] :
% 19.78/3.39     ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v2) = v3)
% 19.78/3.39      |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: int]
% 19.78/3.39      : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & subset(v1, v2) = v4)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2:
% 19.78/3.39      $i] : ( ~ (subset(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 19.78/3.39      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | subset(v0, v2) = 0)
% 19.78/3.39  
% 19.78/3.39    (t47_ordinal1)
% 19.78/3.39     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 19.78/3.39      subset(v0, v1) = 0 & transfinite_sequence_of(v2, v1) = v3 &
% 19.78/3.39      transfinite_sequence_of(v2, v0) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 19.78/3.39  
% 19.78/3.39    (function-axioms)
% 19.78/3.39     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 19.78/3.39    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 19.78/3.39     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 19.78/3.39    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 19.78/3.39    ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 19.78/3.39      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (transfinite_sequence_of(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 19.78/3.39      (transfinite_sequence_of(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 19.78/3.39    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3,
% 19.78/3.39          v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2:
% 19.78/3.39      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v1) |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 19.78/3.39      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 19.78/3.39      ~ (relation_non_empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_non_empty(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 19.78/3.39    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 19.78/3.39      |  ~ (with_non_empty_elements(v2) = v1) |  ~ (with_non_empty_elements(v2) =
% 19.78/3.39        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 19.78/3.39      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_empty_yielding(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 19.78/3.39      (relation_empty_yielding(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2:
% 19.78/3.39      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_rng(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_rng(v2) = v0)) & 
% 19.78/3.39    ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 19.78/3.39      v0 |  ~ (transfinite_sequence(v2) = v1) |  ~ (transfinite_sequence(v2) =
% 19.78/3.39        v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 19.78/3.39      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (one_to_one(v2) = v1) |  ~ (one_to_one(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 19.78/3.39    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 19.78/3.39      |  ~ (relation(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 19.78/3.39      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 19.78/3.39      ~ (epsilon_transitive(v2) = v1) |  ~ (epsilon_transitive(v2) = v0)) &  !
% 19.78/3.39    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 19.78/3.39      |  ~ (ordinal(v2) = v1) |  ~ (ordinal(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 19.78/3.39      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 19.78/3.39      ~ (epsilon_connected(v2) = v1) |  ~ (epsilon_connected(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 19.78/3.39      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 19.78/3.39      ~ (function(v2) = v1) |  ~ (function(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool]
% 19.78/3.39    :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v2) = v1) | 
% 19.78/3.39      ~ (empty(v2) = v0))
% 19.78/3.39  
% 19.78/3.39  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 19.78/3.39  --------------------------------------------
% 19.78/3.40  antisymmetry_r2_hidden, cc1_funct_1, cc1_ordinal1, cc1_relat_1, cc2_funct_1,
% 19.78/3.40  cc2_ordinal1, cc3_ordinal1, existence_m1_ordinal1, existence_m1_subset_1,
% 19.78/3.40  fc12_relat_1, fc1_xboole_0, fc2_ordinal1, fc4_relat_1, fc6_funct_1, fc6_relat_1,
% 19.78/3.40  fc8_relat_1, rc1_funct_1, rc1_ordinal1, rc1_relat_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_funct_1,
% 19.78/3.40  rc2_ordinal1, rc2_relat_1, rc2_xboole_0, rc3_funct_1, rc3_ordinal1, rc3_relat_1,
% 19.78/3.40  rc4_funct_1, rc4_ordinal1, rc5_funct_1, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t1_subset,
% 19.78/3.40  t2_subset, t3_subset, t4_subset, t5_subset, t6_boole, t7_boole, t8_boole
% 19.78/3.40  
% 19.78/3.40  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 19.78/3.40  ---------------------------------
% 19.78/3.40  
% 19.78/3.40  Begin of proof
% 19.78/3.40  | 
% 19.78/3.40  | ALPHA: (d8_ordinal1) implies:
% 19.78/3.40  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: any] : ( ~
% 19.78/3.40  |          (transfinite_sequence_of(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 19.78/3.40  |          [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: any]
% 19.78/3.40  |          : (relation_rng(v1) = v6 & subset(v6, v0) = v7 &
% 19.78/3.40  |            transfinite_sequence(v1) = v5 & relation(v1) = v3 & function(v1) =
% 19.78/3.40  |            v4 & $i(v6) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0) | (( ~ (v7 =
% 19.78/3.40  |                    0) | v2 = 0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v7 = 0)))))
% 19.78/3.40  | 
% 19.78/3.40  | ALPHA: (t1_xboole_1) implies:
% 19.78/3.40  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~
% 19.78/3.40  |          (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | subset(v0,
% 19.78/3.40  |            v2) = 0)
% 19.78/3.40  | 
% 19.78/3.40  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 19.78/3.40  |   (3)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 19.78/3.40  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (function(v2) = v1) |  ~ (function(v2) = v0))
% 19.78/3.40  |   (4)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 19.78/3.40  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation(v2) = v0))
% 19.78/3.40  |   (5)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 19.78/3.40  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (transfinite_sequence(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 19.78/3.40  |          (transfinite_sequence(v2) = v0))
% 19.78/3.40  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 19.78/3.40  |          (relation_rng(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_rng(v2) = v0))
% 19.78/3.40  |   (7)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 19.78/3.40  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2)
% 19.78/3.40  |            = v0))
% 19.78/3.40  | 
% 19.78/3.40  | DELTA: instantiating (t47_ordinal1) with fresh symbols all_54_0, all_54_1,
% 19.78/3.40  |        all_54_2, all_54_3 gives:
% 19.78/3.40  |   (8)   ~ (all_54_0 = 0) & subset(all_54_3, all_54_2) = 0 &
% 19.78/3.40  |        transfinite_sequence_of(all_54_1, all_54_2) = all_54_0 &
% 19.78/3.40  |        transfinite_sequence_of(all_54_1, all_54_3) = 0 & $i(all_54_1) &
% 19.78/3.40  |        $i(all_54_2) & $i(all_54_3)
% 19.78/3.40  | 
% 19.78/3.40  | ALPHA: (8) implies:
% 19.78/3.40  |   (9)   ~ (all_54_0 = 0)
% 19.78/3.40  |   (10)  $i(all_54_3)
% 19.78/3.40  |   (11)  $i(all_54_2)
% 19.78/3.40  |   (12)  $i(all_54_1)
% 19.78/3.40  |   (13)  transfinite_sequence_of(all_54_1, all_54_3) = 0
% 19.78/3.40  |   (14)  transfinite_sequence_of(all_54_1, all_54_2) = all_54_0
% 19.78/3.40  |   (15)  subset(all_54_3, all_54_2) = 0
% 19.78/3.40  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (dt_m1_ordinal1) with all_54_3, all_54_1,
% 19.78/3.41  |              simplifying with (10), (12), (13) gives:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (16)  transfinite_sequence(all_54_1) = 0 & relation(all_54_1) = 0 &
% 19.78/3.41  |         function(all_54_1) = 0
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | ALPHA: (16) implies:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (17)  function(all_54_1) = 0
% 19.78/3.41  |   (18)  relation(all_54_1) = 0
% 19.78/3.41  |   (19)  transfinite_sequence(all_54_1) = 0
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_54_3, all_54_1, 0, simplifying with
% 19.78/3.41  |              (10), (12), (13) gives:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (20)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4:
% 19.78/3.41  |           any] : (relation_rng(all_54_1) = v3 & subset(v3, all_54_3) = v4 &
% 19.78/3.41  |           transfinite_sequence(all_54_1) = v2 & relation(all_54_1) = v0 &
% 19.78/3.41  |           function(all_54_1) = v1 & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~
% 19.78/3.41  |             (v0 = 0) | v4 = 0))
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_54_2, all_54_1, all_54_0, simplifying
% 19.78/3.41  |              with (11), (12), (14) gives:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (21)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4:
% 19.78/3.41  |           any] : (relation_rng(all_54_1) = v3 & subset(v3, all_54_2) = v4 &
% 19.78/3.41  |           transfinite_sequence(all_54_1) = v2 & relation(all_54_1) = v0 &
% 19.78/3.41  |           function(all_54_1) = v1 & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~
% 19.78/3.41  |             (v0 = 0) | (( ~ (v4 = 0) | all_54_0 = 0) & ( ~ (all_54_0 = 0) | v4
% 19.78/3.41  |                 = 0))))
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbols all_182_0, all_182_1, all_182_2,
% 19.78/3.41  |        all_182_3, all_182_4 gives:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (22)  relation_rng(all_54_1) = all_182_1 & subset(all_182_1, all_54_3) =
% 19.78/3.41  |         all_182_0 & transfinite_sequence(all_54_1) = all_182_2 &
% 19.78/3.41  |         relation(all_54_1) = all_182_4 & function(all_54_1) = all_182_3 &
% 19.78/3.41  |         $i(all_182_1) & ( ~ (all_182_2 = 0) |  ~ (all_182_3 = 0) |  ~
% 19.78/3.41  |           (all_182_4 = 0) | all_182_0 = 0)
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | ALPHA: (22) implies:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (23)  function(all_54_1) = all_182_3
% 19.78/3.41  |   (24)  relation(all_54_1) = all_182_4
% 19.78/3.41  |   (25)  transfinite_sequence(all_54_1) = all_182_2
% 19.78/3.41  |   (26)  subset(all_182_1, all_54_3) = all_182_0
% 19.78/3.41  |   (27)  relation_rng(all_54_1) = all_182_1
% 19.78/3.41  |   (28)   ~ (all_182_2 = 0) |  ~ (all_182_3 = 0) |  ~ (all_182_4 = 0) |
% 19.78/3.41  |         all_182_0 = 0
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | DELTA: instantiating (21) with fresh symbols all_184_0, all_184_1, all_184_2,
% 19.78/3.41  |        all_184_3, all_184_4 gives:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (29)  relation_rng(all_54_1) = all_184_1 & subset(all_184_1, all_54_2) =
% 19.78/3.41  |         all_184_0 & transfinite_sequence(all_54_1) = all_184_2 &
% 19.78/3.41  |         relation(all_54_1) = all_184_4 & function(all_54_1) = all_184_3 &
% 19.78/3.41  |         $i(all_184_1) & ( ~ (all_184_2 = 0) |  ~ (all_184_3 = 0) |  ~
% 19.78/3.41  |           (all_184_4 = 0) | (( ~ (all_184_0 = 0) | all_54_0 = 0) & ( ~
% 19.78/3.41  |               (all_54_0 = 0) | all_184_0 = 0)))
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | ALPHA: (29) implies:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (30)  $i(all_184_1)
% 19.78/3.41  |   (31)  function(all_54_1) = all_184_3
% 19.78/3.41  |   (32)  relation(all_54_1) = all_184_4
% 19.78/3.41  |   (33)  transfinite_sequence(all_54_1) = all_184_2
% 19.78/3.41  |   (34)  subset(all_184_1, all_54_2) = all_184_0
% 19.78/3.41  |   (35)  relation_rng(all_54_1) = all_184_1
% 19.78/3.41  |   (36)   ~ (all_184_2 = 0) |  ~ (all_184_3 = 0) |  ~ (all_184_4 = 0) | (( ~
% 19.78/3.41  |             (all_184_0 = 0) | all_54_0 = 0) & ( ~ (all_54_0 = 0) | all_184_0 =
% 19.78/3.41  |             0))
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_182_3, all_184_3, all_54_1,
% 19.78/3.41  |              simplifying with (23), (31) gives:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (37)  all_184_3 = all_182_3
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with 0, all_184_3, all_54_1, simplifying with
% 19.78/3.41  |              (17), (31) gives:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (38)  all_184_3 = 0
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_182_4, all_184_4, all_54_1,
% 19.78/3.41  |              simplifying with (24), (32) gives:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (39)  all_184_4 = all_182_4
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.41  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with 0, all_184_4, all_54_1, simplifying with
% 19.78/3.41  |              (18), (32) gives:
% 19.78/3.41  |   (40)  all_184_4 = 0
% 19.78/3.41  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_182_2, all_184_2, all_54_1,
% 19.78/3.42  |              simplifying with (25), (33) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (41)  all_184_2 = all_182_2
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with 0, all_184_2, all_54_1, simplifying with
% 19.78/3.42  |              (19), (33) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (42)  all_184_2 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_182_1, all_184_1, all_54_1,
% 19.78/3.42  |              simplifying with (27), (35) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (43)  all_184_1 = all_182_1
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | COMBINE_EQS: (41), (42) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (44)  all_182_2 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | SIMP: (44) implies:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (45)  all_182_2 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | COMBINE_EQS: (37), (38) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (46)  all_182_3 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | SIMP: (46) implies:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (47)  all_182_3 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | COMBINE_EQS: (39), (40) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (48)  all_182_4 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | SIMP: (48) implies:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (49)  all_182_4 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | REDUCE: (34), (43) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (50)  subset(all_182_1, all_54_2) = all_184_0
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | REDUCE: (30), (43) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  |   (51)  $i(all_182_1)
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | BETA: splitting (36) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  | 
% 19.78/3.42  | Case 1:
% 19.78/3.42  | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | |   (52)   ~ (all_184_2 = 0)
% 19.78/3.42  | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | REDUCE: (42), (52) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  | |   (53)  $false
% 19.78/3.42  | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | CLOSE: (53) is inconsistent.
% 19.78/3.42  | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | Case 2:
% 19.78/3.42  | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | |   (54)   ~ (all_184_3 = 0) |  ~ (all_184_4 = 0) | (( ~ (all_184_0 = 0) |
% 19.78/3.42  | |             all_54_0 = 0) & ( ~ (all_54_0 = 0) | all_184_0 = 0))
% 19.78/3.42  | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | BETA: splitting (28) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | Case 1:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | |   (55)   ~ (all_182_2 = 0)
% 19.78/3.42  | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | REDUCE: (45), (55) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  | | |   (56)  $false
% 19.78/3.42  | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | CLOSE: (56) is inconsistent.
% 19.78/3.42  | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | Case 2:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | |   (57)   ~ (all_182_3 = 0) |  ~ (all_182_4 = 0) | all_182_0 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | BETA: splitting (54) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | Case 1:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | |   (58)   ~ (all_184_3 = 0)
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | REDUCE: (38), (58) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | |   (59)  $false
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | CLOSE: (59) is inconsistent.
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | Case 2:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | |   (60)   ~ (all_184_4 = 0) | (( ~ (all_184_0 = 0) | all_54_0 = 0) & ( ~
% 19.78/3.42  | | | |             (all_54_0 = 0) | all_184_0 = 0))
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | BETA: splitting (60) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | Case 1:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | |   (61)   ~ (all_184_4 = 0)
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | REDUCE: (40), (61) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | |   (62)  $false
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | CLOSE: (62) is inconsistent.
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | Case 2:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | |   (63)  ( ~ (all_184_0 = 0) | all_54_0 = 0) & ( ~ (all_54_0 = 0) |
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | |           all_184_0 = 0)
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | ALPHA: (63) implies:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | |   (64)   ~ (all_184_0 = 0) | all_54_0 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | BETA: splitting (64) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | Case 1:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | |   (65)   ~ (all_184_0 = 0)
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (57) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | |   (66)   ~ (all_182_3 = 0)
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (47), (66) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | |   (67)  $false
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (67) is inconsistent.
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | |   (68)   ~ (all_182_4 = 0) | all_182_0 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (68) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | |   (69)   ~ (all_182_4 = 0)
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (49), (69) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | |   (70)  $false
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (70) is inconsistent.
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | |   (71)  all_182_0 = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (26), (71) imply:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | |   (72)  subset(all_182_1, all_54_3) = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_182_1, all_54_3,
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | |              all_54_2, simplifying with (10), (11), (15), (51),
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | |              (72) gives:
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | |   (73)  subset(all_182_1, all_54_2) = 0
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_184_0, 0, all_54_2,
% 19.78/3.42  | | | | | | | |              all_182_1, simplifying with (50), (73) gives:
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | | |   (74)  all_184_0 = 0
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (65), (74) imply:
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | | |   (75)  $false
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (75) is inconsistent.
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | | End of split
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | End of split
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | Case 2:
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | |   (76)  all_54_0 = 0
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | REDUCE: (9), (76) imply:
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | |   (77)  $false
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | CLOSE: (77) is inconsistent.
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | End of split
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | End of split
% 19.78/3.43  | | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | | End of split
% 19.78/3.43  | | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | | End of split
% 19.78/3.43  | | 
% 19.78/3.43  | End of split
% 19.78/3.43  | 
% 19.78/3.43  End of proof
% 19.78/3.43  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 19.78/3.43  
% 19.78/3.43  2826ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------