↑ Up

SInE---0.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : NUM411+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : n037.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 15:21:15 EST 2018

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  133 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  158 (  68   ~;  62   |;  20   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   5 sgn  35   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
     => ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2)
        & transfinite_sequence(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpFw0SGG/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',dt_m1_ordinal1) ).

fof(4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X3) )
     => subset(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpFw0SGG/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',t1_xboole_1) ).

fof(11,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpFw0SGG/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(25,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X1)
         => transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpFw0SGG/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',t47_ordinal1) ).

fof(32,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2)
        & transfinite_sequence(X2) )
     => ( transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
      <=> subset(relation_rng(X2),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpFw0SGG/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',d8_ordinal1) ).

fof(44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( subset(X1,X2)
       => ! [X3] :
            ( transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X1)
           => transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[25]) ).

fof(58,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
      | ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2)
        & transfinite_sequence(X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

fof(59,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3)
      | ( relation(X4)
        & function(X4)
        & transfinite_sequence(X4) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[58]) ).

fof(60,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( relation(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3) )
      & ( function(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3) )
      & ( transfinite_sequence(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[59]) ).

cnf(61,plain,
    ( transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( function(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

cnf(63,plain,
    ( relation(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[60]) ).

fof(64,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
      | ~ subset(X2,X3)
      | subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

fof(65,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
      | ~ subset(X5,X6)
      | subset(X4,X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[64]) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65]) ).

fof(97,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : subset(X3,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

cnf(98,plain,
    subset(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[97]) ).

fof(147,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
      & ? [X3] :
          ( transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X1)
          & ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[44]) ).

fof(148,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X4,X5] :
      ( subset(X4,X5)
      & ? [X6] :
          ( transfinite_sequence_of(X6,X4)
          & ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X6,X5) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[147]) ).

fof(149,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk9_0,esk10_0)
    & transfinite_sequence_of(esk11_0,esk9_0)
    & ~ transfinite_sequence_of(esk11_0,esk10_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[148]) ).

cnf(150,negated_conjecture,
    ~ transfinite_sequence_of(esk11_0,esk10_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[149]) ).

cnf(151,negated_conjecture,
    transfinite_sequence_of(esk11_0,esk9_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[149]) ).

cnf(152,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk9_0,esk10_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[149]) ).

fof(177,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ function(X2)
      | ~ transfinite_sequence(X2)
      | ( ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
          | subset(relation_rng(X2),X1) )
        & ( ~ subset(relation_rng(X2),X1)
          | transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[32]) ).

fof(178,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X4)
      | ~ function(X4)
      | ~ transfinite_sequence(X4)
      | ( ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3)
          | subset(relation_rng(X4),X3) )
        & ( ~ subset(relation_rng(X4),X3)
          | transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[177]) ).

fof(179,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3)
        | subset(relation_rng(X4),X3)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence(X4) )
      & ( ~ subset(relation_rng(X4),X3)
        | transfinite_sequence_of(X4,X3)
        | ~ relation(X4)
        | ~ function(X4)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[178]) ).

cnf(180,plain,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[179]) ).

cnf(181,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[179]) ).

cnf(247,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk10_0)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk9_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[66,152,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(279,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[181,61]) ).

cnf(280,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[279,62]) ).

cnf(281,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[280,63]) ).

cnf(319,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk10_0)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,esk9_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[66,247,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(343,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk10_0)
    | ~ subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X2,esk9_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[319,281,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(437,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),esk10_0)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk9_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[343,98,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(461,negated_conjecture,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk10_0)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk9_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[180,437,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2127,negated_conjecture,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk10_0)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk9_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[461,63]) ).

cnf(2128,negated_conjecture,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk10_0)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk9_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[2127,62]) ).

cnf(2129,negated_conjecture,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk10_0)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk9_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[2128,61]) ).

cnf(2130,negated_conjecture,
    ~ transfinite_sequence_of(esk11_0,esk9_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[150,2129,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2141,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2130,151,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2142,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[2141,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2143,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    2142,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM411+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.23  % Computer : n037.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.02/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 03:45:14 CST 2018
% 0.02/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.28  % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.28  --creating new selector for []
% 0.07/0.38  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpFw0SGG/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.07/0.38  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpFw0SGG/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.07/0.38  -prover status Theorem
% 0.07/0.38  Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.07/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.38  % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.38  Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.07/0.38  # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.07/0.38  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.39  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------