↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : NUM412+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:57:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.12s 1.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   83 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   91 (  36   ~;  33   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   3 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d8_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2)
        & transfinite_sequence(X2) )
     => ( transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
      <=> subset(relation_rng(X2),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_ordinal1) ).

fof(dt_m1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
     => ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2)
        & transfinite_sequence(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_m1_ordinal1) ).

fof(t48_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( ordinal(X3)
         => transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(X2,X3),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t48_ordinal1) ).

fof(t47_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X1)
         => transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t47_ordinal1) ).

fof(dt_k2_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1)
        & transfinite_sequence(X1)
        & ordinal(X2) )
     => transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(X1,X2),relation_rng(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_ordinal1) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X80,X81] :
      ( ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X81,X80)
        | subset(relation_rng(X81),X80)
        | ~ relation(X81)
        | ~ function(X81)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence(X81) )
      & ( ~ subset(relation_rng(X81),X80)
        | transfinite_sequence_of(X81,X80)
        | ~ relation(X81)
        | ~ function(X81)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence(X81) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_ordinal1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X86,X87] :
      ( ( relation(X87)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X87,X86) )
      & ( function(X87)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X87,X86) )
      & ( transfinite_sequence(X87)
        | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X87,X86) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_m1_ordinal1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( transfinite_sequence_of(X2,X1)
       => ! [X3] :
            ( ordinal(X3)
           => transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(X2,X3),X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t48_ordinal1]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( function(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( relation(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(esk18_0,esk17_0)
    & ordinal(esk19_0)
    & ~ transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(esk18_0,esk19_0),esk17_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X122,X123,X124] :
      ( ~ subset(X122,X123)
      | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X124,X122)
      | transfinite_sequence_of(X124,X123) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t47_ordinal1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    transfinite_sequence_of(esk18_0,esk17_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    subset(relation_rng(esk18_0),esk17_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X82,X83] :
      ( ~ relation(X82)
      | ~ function(X82)
      | ~ transfinite_sequence(X82)
      | ~ ordinal(X83)
      | transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(X82,X83),relation_rng(X82)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_ordinal1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(X1,esk17_0)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(X1,relation_rng(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(X1,X2),relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    transfinite_sequence(esk18_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk18_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk18_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(esk18_0,esk19_0),esk17_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(esk18_0,X1),esk17_0)
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk19_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06  % Problem    : NUM412+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.06/0.24  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.24  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.24  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.24  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.06/0.24  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.06/0.24  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.24  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.24  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 00:31:30 EDT 2026
% 0.06/0.24  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.06/0.25  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.12/1.61  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.12/1.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.12/1.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.12/1.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.12/1.61  % Total time : 1.362s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------