↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : NUM414+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:16:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  42   ~;  28   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn  10   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(connectedness_r1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ordinal(B)
        & ordinal(A) )
     => ( ordinal_subset(B,A)
        | ordinal_subset(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',connectedness_r1_ordinal1) ).

fof(d8_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( proper_subset(A,B)
    <=> ( A != B
        & subset(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d8_xboole_0) ).

fof(redefinition_r1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ordinal(B)
        & ordinal(A) )
     => ( ordinal_subset(A,B)
      <=> subset(A,B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',redefinition_r1_ordinal1) ).

fof(t50_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [A] :
      ( ordinal(A)
     => ! [B] :
          ( ordinal(B)
         => ~ ( ~ proper_subset(B,A)
              & A != B
              & ~ proper_subset(A,B) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t50_ordinal1) ).

fof(t50_ordinal1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( ordinal(A)
       => ! [B] :
            ( ordinal(B)
           => ~ ( ~ proper_subset(B,A)
                & A != B
                & ~ proper_subset(A,B) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t50_ordinal1]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    ( B = A
    | ~ subset(A,B)
    | proper_subset(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d8_xboole_0]) ).

cnf(c_76,plain,
    ( subset(A,B)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(A,B)
    | ~ ordinal(B)
    | ~ ordinal(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[redefinition_r1_ordinal1]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    ( ordinal_subset(B,A)
    | ordinal_subset(A,B)
    | ~ ordinal(B)
    | ~ ordinal(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[connectedness_r1_ordinal1]) ).

fof(nnf_41,plain,
    ? [A] :
      ( ? [B] :
          ( ~ proper_subset(B,A)
          & B != A
          & ~ proper_subset(A,B)
          & ordinal(B) )
      & ordinal(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t50_ordinal1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t50_ordinal1_neg,plain,
    ( ~ proper_subset(sK1,sK0)
    & sK1 != sK0
    & ~ proper_subset(sK0,sK1)
    & ordinal(sK1)
    & ordinal(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_41]) ).

cnf(c_119,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t50_ordinal1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_120,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t50_ordinal1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_121,negated_conjecture,
    ~ proper_subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t50_ordinal1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_122,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t50_ordinal1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_123,negated_conjecture,
    ~ proper_subset(sK1,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t50_ordinal1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_124,plain,
    ( B = A
    | proper_subset(A,B)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(A,B)
    | ~ ordinal(B)
    | ~ ordinal(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_76,c_74]) ).

cnf(c_211,negated_conjecture,
    ( A = sK1
    | proper_subset(sK1,A)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(sK1,A)
    | ~ ordinal(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_120]) ).

cnf(c_212,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK0 = sK1
    | proper_subset(sK1,sK0)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(sK1,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_211,c_119]) ).

cnf(c_213,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK0 = sK1
    | ~ ordinal_subset(sK1,sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_212,c_123]) ).

cnf(c_214,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_122]) ).

cnf(c_173,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordinal_subset(sK1,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_213,c_214]) ).

cnf(c_215,negated_conjecture,
    ( A = sK0
    | proper_subset(sK0,A)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(sK0,A)
    | ~ ordinal(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_124,c_119]) ).

cnf(c_216,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 = sK0
    | proper_subset(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_215,c_120]) ).

cnf(c_217,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 = sK0
    | ~ ordinal_subset(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_216,c_121]) ).

cnf(c_174,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordinal_subset(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_217,c_122]) ).

cnf(c_218,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal_subset(sK0,A)
    | ordinal_subset(A,sK0)
    | ~ ordinal(A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_119]) ).

cnf(c_219,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal_subset(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ ordinal(sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_173]) ).

cnf(c_220,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordinal(sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_219,c_174]) ).

cnf(c_210,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_120,c_220]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : NUM414+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.45  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 02:35:02 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.19/0.46  % Process 3810164 was started by sandbox on n017,
% 0.19/0.46  % Sat Sep 26 02:35:02 2026
% 0.19/0.46  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.19/0.49  % Length of proof is 16.
% 0.19/0.49  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.19/0.49  % Maximum clause weight is 18.000.
% 0.19/0.49  % Given clauses 65.
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------